50 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2016
    1. hillocks

      Small mounds or hills

    2. After an uncertain solitude, I was suddenly aroused by a loud cry piercing the night. It was my mother's voice wailing among the barren hills which held the bones of buried warriors. She called aloud for her brothers' spirits to support her in her helpless misery. My fingers grew icy cold, as I realized that my unrestrained tears had betrayed my suffering to her, and she was grieving for me.

      Here Zitkala-Sa appeals to the emotions of the audience which she does throughout her writing. She describes hearing her mother crying in agony for her.

      P. Jane Hafen, "Zitkala Ša: Sentimentality and Sovereignty" http://www.jstor.org/stable/1409205?&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

    3. Many schemes of running away from my surroundings hovered about in my mind. A few more moons of such a turmoil drove me away to the Eastern school. I rode on the white man's iron steed, thinking it would bring me back to my mother in a few winters, when I should be grown tall, and there would be congenial friends awaiting me.

      She runs away to her place of original suffering to get away from her current home suffering at this point in her life.

    4. At these gatherings they talked English. I could speak English almost as well as my brother, but I was not properly dressed to be taken along. I had no hat, no ribbons, and no close-fitting gown. Since my return from school I had thrown away my shoes, and wore again the soft moccasins.

      This perfectly exemplifies Zitkala-Sa's resistance to cultural change completely while acknowledging that she has in fact changed a little bit.

      Laura L. Terrance, "Resisting colonial education: Zitkala-Sa and Native Feminist archival refusal" http://pages.ucsd.edu/~rfrank/class_web/ES-114A/Week%204/Terrance%20native%20feminist%20refusal.pdf

    5. "Here, my child, are the white man's papers. Read a little from them," she said most piously.

      Interesting that her mother tried to comfort her with the religion of the white men instead of something from their own culture.

    6. Indian Bible

      Translation of an English Geneva Bible that was published in Indian Massachusett language.

    7. I buried my face in my arms and cried hot tears.

      Again Zitkala-Sa uses great description in her change of emotions in this scene. The audience is able to relate to her here.

    8. I did not appreciate his kindly interest, for there was an unrest gnawing at my heart

      Again she feels detached from her family life after just enjoying herself which again leads her to feeling bad about herself. She also uses great imagery to show her pain to the audience.

    9. There was nothing moving within that great circular horizon of the Dakota prairies save the tall grasses, over which the wind blew and rolled off in long, shadowy waves

      Here she describes where she is in the west, specifically the Dakotas region of the current United States where the Dakota prairies are located. She also seems to change her tone here showing admiration for her homeland's beauty.

    10. as I passed by, he looked a quiet "What?" into my eyes.

      Great use of description by Zitkala-Sa here, the audience gains a clear picture of her brother's expression using visuals.

    11.    During this time I seemed to hang in the heart of chaos, beyond the touch or voice of human aid. My brother, being almost ten years my senior, did not quite understand my feelings. My mother had never gone inside of a schoolhouse, and so she was not capable of comforting her daughter who could read and write.

      Zitkala-Sa defines her personal detachment from her family caused by how different she is with imagery and description of her feelings

    12. They -192- were no more young braves in blankets and eagle plumes, nor Indian maids with prettily painted cheeks. They had gone three years to school in the East, and had become civilized. The young men wore the white man's coat and trousers, with bright neckties. The girls wore tight muslin dresses, with ribbons at neck and waist. At these gatherings they talked English. I could speak English almost as well as my brother, but I was not properly dressed to be taken along. I had no hat, no ribbons, and no close-fitting gown. Since my return from school I had thrown away my shoes, and wore again the soft moccasins.

      Zitkala-Sa acknowledges how much her peers have changed after going to school in the east. She also makes it clear that she does not want to change as they have showing how culturally unhinged she is.

      Gertrude Bonnin (Zitkala-Sa; Sioux) (1876-1938) http://college.cengage.com/english/lauter/heath/4e/students/author_pages/late_nineteenth/bonninzitkalasasioux_ge.html

    13. "No, my baby sister, I cannot take you with me to the party to-night," he replied. Though I was not far from fifteen, and I felt that before long I should enjoy all the privileges of my tall cousin, Dawee persisted in calling me his baby sister

      Zitkala-Sa tries to immerse herself in her culture here by asking to go out with her brother. It's her way of trying to fit in.

    14. wigwam

      Is a domed dwelling formerly used by certain Native American and First Nations tribes.

    15. bridle

      The headgear used to control a horse, consisting of buckled straps to which a bit and reins are attached

    16. buckboard

      A buckboard is a four-wheeled wagon of simple construction meant to be drawn by a horse or other large animal

    17. Even nature seemed to have no place for me. I was neither a wee girl nor a tall one; neither a wild Indian nor a tame one. This deplorable situation was the effect of my brief course in the East, and the unsatisfactory "teenth" in a girl's years

      She feels completely detached at this moment, feeling as if she doesn't belong in any culture.

    18. After my first three years of school, I roamed again in the Western country through four strange summers

      Here she immediately sets the scene of her return home.

  2. Mar 2016
    1. Here Thoreau recognizes the idea of rebellion is not easy because the government can go after you in return. [24]

    2. Here Thoreau relates various types of oppressed people by the government, truly showing a pattern. He is also relating to his just and moral nature described in the background text. [22]

    3. Great use of a contradictory idea. Because he believes the government is acting unjustly, they will punish the just to uphold their beliefs. [22]

    4. I do not hesitate to say, that those who call themselves Abolitionists should at once effectually withdraw their support, both in person and property, from the government of Massachusetts, and not wait till they constitute a majority of one, before they suffer the right to prevail through them. I think that it is enough if they have God on their side, without waiting for that other one. Moreover, any man more right than his neighbors constitutes a majority of one already.

      Here Thoreau clearly portrays his thoughts. Using a type of rallying tone, he is attempting to persuade his audience to renounce the evil and injustice for which he is fighting to end and join him.

    5. As for adopting the ways of the State has provided for remedying the evil, I know not of such ways. They take too much time, and a man's life will be gone. I have other affairs to attend to.

      He truly believes in action must be taken immediately because this issue is of life and death although many did not see it that way at the time.

    6. If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go, let it go: perchance it will wear smooth�certainly the machine will wear out. If the injustice has a spring, or a pulley, or a rope, or a crank, exclusively for itself, then perhaps you may consider whether the remedy will not be worse than the evil; but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter-friction to stop the machine.

      Firm affirmation of Thoreau's beliefs shown here. Interesting that he is supporting breaking the law rather than remedying the situation. This can be seen as a relation to the fact that Thoreau supported John Brown for his rebellion against slavery as pointed out in Heath Anthology by Glick.

    7. Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once? Men, generally, under such a government as this, think that they ought to wait until they have persuaded the majority to alter them. They think that, if they should resist, the remedy would be worse than the evil. But it is the fault of the government itself that the remedy is worse than the evil. It makes it worse.

      More great use of rhetorical questions in order to persuade the reader into his overall message. he is saying we must act at once at the site of injustice.

    8. Even voting for the right is doing nothing for it. It is only expressing to men feebly your desire that it should prevail. A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance, nor wish it to prevail through the power of the majority. There is but little virtue in the action of masses of men. When the majority shall at length vote for the abolition of slavery, it will be because they are indifferent to slavery, or because there is but little slavery left to be abolished by their vote.They will then be the only slaves. Only his vote can hasten the abolition of slavery who asserts his own freedom by his

      Interesting take here by Thoreau. He wishes for nothing more than the abolition of slavery but yet he feels when it is voted to be ended it wont be for the right reasons.

    9. All voting is a sort of gaming, like checkers or backgammon, with a slight moral tinge to it, a playing with right and wrong, with moral questions; and betting naturally accompanies it.

      Here, Thoreau uses another analogy of relating voting to a game of strategy and chance. He again displays his prowess in imagery supported by Heath Anthology by Wendell Glick.

    10. We are accustomed to say, that the mass of men are unprepared; but improvement is slow, because the few are not as materially wiser or better than the many. It is not so important that many should be good as you, as that there be some absolute goodness somewhere; for that will leaven the whole lump.

      Interesting tone here used by Thoreau. It seems that he is being both sarcastic and honest in this passage. He is obviously part of the wise few that is losing this argument of morality but believes it will still make a difference.

    11. Thoreau continually uses great imagery as discussed in paragraph 4 of the background text, here is relating the government problem as a matter of life and death which is eye opening. [9]

    12. All machines have their friction; and possibly this does enough good to counter-balance the evil. At any rate, it is a great evil to make a stir about it. But when the friction comes to have its machine, and oppression and robbery are organized, I say, let us not have such a machine any longer.

      Great depth used in his own original analogy. He is saying that machines (men) will have friction (problems) which will cause them to need to be fixed. This is achieved on their own simply by working the way it does. Interesting for him to say get rid of the machine after stating possibly this works.

    13. Thoreau continually uses rhetorical questions towards the audience. Here he also reaffirms his belief in anti-slavery as pointed out in the text of his life in "Heath Anthology" by Wendell Glick.

    14. The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will , is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it.Witness the present Mexican war, the work of comparatively a few individuals using the standing government as their tool; for in the outset, the people would not have consented to this measure.

      Here, Thoreau relates to the Mexican war in which was going during the time he was writing this piece to enlighten the audience on why it was happening and the abuse of government. He also uses Thomas Jefferson to reaffirm his standing about how much the government should govern.

    15. There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them; who, esteeming themselves children of Washington and Franklin, sit down with their hands in their pockets, and say that they know not what to do, and do nothing; who even postpone the question of freedom to the question of free trade, and quietly read the prices-current along with the latest advices from Mexico, after dinner, and, it may be, fall asleep over them both. What is the price-current of an honest man and patriot today?

      Here Thoreau explains the position many men were placed in during this time. This is a great example of the people knowing what the problem is, and instead of changing it, they are instead participating in the growth of it. Which is exactly Thoreau's point in this piece so far. Thoreau uses imagery here to clearly explain his point to the audience, he relates to them the effects on non-participation in change.

    16. This principle being admitted, the justice of every particular case of resistance is reduced to a computation of the quantity of the danger and grievance on the one side, and of the probability and expense of redressing it on the other." Of this, he says, every man shall judge for himself. But Paley appears never to have contemplated those cases to which the rule of expediency does not apply, in which a people, as well and an individual, must do justice, cost what it may.

      Here Thoreau uses Paley to explain his point that going against the government is not pretty business on any side of the action. He reiterates that change must occur, despite the consequences if it is truly needed.

    17. All men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse allegiance to, and to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable. But almost all say that such is not the case now. But such was the case, they think, in the Revolution of �75. If one were to tell me that this was a bad government because it taxed certain foreign commodities brought to its ports, it is most probable that I should not make an ado about it, for I can do without them.

      Interesting how he relates back to the American Revolution here. I believe he does this because then too, the English government oppression began with taking away small liberties similar to what he is describing previously in his text. This perhaps is a nudge towards possible foreshadowing.

    18. The mass of men serve the state thus, not as men mainly, but as machines, with their bodies. They are the standing army, and the militia, jailers, constables, posse comitatus, etc. In most cases there is no free exercise whatever of the judgement or of the moral sense; but they put themselves on a level with wood and earth and stones; and wooden men can perhaps be manufactured that will serve the purpose as well.

      Thoreau is stating here that men in that day had no use other than serving with little to no choice given, only orders, like machines. He is questioning their humanity at this point. Thoreau uses fantastic imagery here as well, using a machine as a metaphor for men.

    19. But government in which the majority rule in all cases can not be based on justice, even as far as men understand it. Can there not be a government in which the majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience?�in which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable?

      Interesting take on the governmental system, Thoreau questions here why those who do not run the government are more bystanders than active participants in choices being made. Thoreau uses rhetorical questions here directly with the audience, he is making them form an opinion.

    20. But, to speak practically and as a citizen, unlike those who call themselves no-government men, I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it.

      Great passage here from Thoreau. Not only for his sincerity, but also because he truly connects with his audience here by relating himself to us. All he wants is a better government for all of us, and we are the ones who can influence change.

    21. This American government�what is it but a tradition, though a recent one, endeavoring to transmit itself unimpaired to posterity, but each instant losing some of its integrity? It has not the vitality and force of a single living man; for a single man can bend it to his will.

      Strong words from Thoreau. He is asking how can we accept that the government is as strong as the people it governs, when it is the people who bend and skew it's purpose. It is neither true or strong according to him.

    22. The objections which have been brought against a standing army, and they are many and weighty, and deserve to prevail, may also at last be brought against a standing government. The standing army is only an arm of the standing government.

      This statement is interesting by Thoreau, he is saying that many people make complaints about many things in the world that have to do with the government but not the actual government itself.

  3. Jan 2016
    1. And farther, if you would have a faithful servant, and one that you like, serve yourself. And again, he adviseth to circumspection and care, even in the smallest matters, because sometimes a little neglect may breed great mischief; adding, for want of a nail the shoe was lost; for want of a shoe the horse was lost, and for want of a horse the rider was lost, being overtaken and slain by the enemy, all for want of care about a horse-shoe nail.

      I believe this is saying to trust yourself before trusting others because simple mistakes can lead to enormous grief. I really like the use of the old Japanese (I believe) adage of the "want of a nail". This really puts every day activities into perspective.

    2. learning is to the studious, and riches to the careful, as well as power to the bold, and Heaven to the virtuous

      I love these analogies because it puts major perspectives of our lives into simple ideas.

    3. "And again, the eye of a master will do more work than both his hands; and again, want of care does us more damage than want of knowledge; and again, not to oversee workmen is to leave them your purse open.

      In the end, we must oversee our wealth and successes from people that would want to take them from us. We have to remain objective in our industry choices rather than being personal in order to protect ourselves.

    4. But with our industry, we must likewise be steady, settled and careful, and oversee our own affairs with our own eyes, and not trust too much to others; for, as Poor Richard says,

      He warns of being too trusting here. I believe he alludes the possible trouble one can experience with the pleasures of success.

    5. Many without labor would live by their wits only, but they break for want of stock. Whereas industry gives comfort, and plenty, and respect: fly pleasures, and they'll follow you. The diligent spinner has a large shift, and now I have a sheep and a cow, everybody bids me good morrow, all which is well said by Poor Richard.

      Those that work for a living have more comfortable lives than those that do not. He speaks about the comfort he has in his life here and ends it with a sort of "all is okay here" kind of notion.

    6. Do you imagine that sloth will afford you more comfort than labor? No, for as Poor Richard says, trouble springs from idleness, and grievous toil from needless ease.

      Sarcastic rhetoric used here to sway the readers and prove a point.

    7. "Methinks I hear some of you say, must a man afford himself no leisure? I will tell thee, my friend, what Poor Richard says, employ thy time well if thou meanest to gain leisure; and, since thou art not sure of a minute, throw not away an hour. Leisure is time for doing something useful; this leisure the diligent man will obtain, but the lazy man never; so that, as Poor Richard says, a life of leisure and a life of laziness are two things.

      Again, Franklin allures to not wasting time and being productive in order to gain pleasure. He says those that work will enjoy leisure while the lazy will not because the workers will have earned their leisure by that time.

    8. "So what signifies wishing and hoping for better times. We may make these times better if we bestir ourselves. Industry need not wish, as Poor Richard says, and he that lives upon hope will die fasting. There are no gains, without pains,

      I think Franklin is stating here that we simply cannot hope to better our lives simply because we want them to be better. We have to endure the "pains" of hard work in order to appreciate the "gains" of success. I believe he meant this to be true of all classes of people. We still see this occurring today.

    9. drive thy business, let not that drive thee; and early to bed, and early to rise, makes a man healthy, wealthy and wise.

      A suggestion on how to succeed, a motivational message similar to what is heard today. Reaffirming the overall theme of not being lazy

    10. God helps them that help themselves

      I like how he uses God to help inspire. This statement is imperative because it provides hope.