14 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2024
    1. In American scholarship, periods and commas always go inside end quotation marks.

      It would be helpful to see an example that includes a citation. It always trips me up.

    2. The professor answered: “If your writing is not clear to your reader, you have no ideas.”

      Brutal, but brilliant. I'm writing this one down!

    1. Depression/Anxiety

      Thank you for putting this on the list. For me, procrastination is a symptom of anxiety.

    1. Some disciplines have their own dictionaries of key terms.

      I have been using The Bedford Glossary of Critical and Literary Terms (Ross Murfin/Supriya M. Ray) across numerous courses. It's so helpful to quickly look up a term that I'm unfamiliar with when reading others' work.

    1. The inductive argument moves the opposite way

      This push/pull of deductive reasoning (conceptual --> concrete) and inductive reasoning (concrete --> conceptual) is very helpful in argument development.

  2. Mar 2024
    1. 150-500 word paragraph

      The text says 150-500 words, but the Refresher says 150-250 words. Is 500 words too long?

  3. Feb 2024
    1. For this reason, the systematic review is more common in the health and social sciences, where comprehensiveness is more important than interpretation, than the humanities.

      Readability Note: ", than the humanities" I'm tripping over this sentence badly. Is it saying that comprehensiveness is more of a priority in the health and social sciences, and interpretation is more important in the humanities?

    1. monographs

      I know what a monograph is because I watched The Holdovers on a plane last week. Great movie, and hilarious scene about Paul Giamatti's character claiming to be working on a monograph when he met a former classmate. However, a definition here would be super helpful!

    1. citation style

      This link is broken as well

    2. quoting, paraphrasing, summarizing

      These links appear to be broken

  4. Jan 2024
    1. warrants

      This sidebar comment sent me outside of the textbook to an internet search for the definition of warrant. Somewhere along the way, I missed the lesson on the parts of a rhetorical argument. The section in Establishing Relevance about Aristotle's types of rhetoric is useful, but I need to learn a lot more about this. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/historical_perspectives_on_argumentation/toulmin_argument.html

    1. A question on critical research projects. If we're applying standards of quality to the work, are they standards we define ourselves or are defined by others? In Said's case, he has defined how the treatment of imperialism should be judged. Is this always the case or are we sometimes adhering to the standards others have set? Or is it dependent on the assignment?