32 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2020
    1. Commodus used to make many unusual expenditures, and for this reason neither his other revenues nor the funds provided by Cleander, though incalculable in amount, sufficed him, and he was compelled to bring charges against even women — charges not calling for capital punishment, yet full of vague terror and threats. In consequence he sold them their lives for a large price and got something from them by force under the guise of a voluntary offering."

      Of course you needed to pay a large price in order to live....

    2. For when he was intending to fight once more as a gladiator, he bade us enter the amphitheatre in the equestrian garb and in our woollen cloaks, a thing that we never do when going to the amphitheatre except when one of the emperors has passed away; and on the last day his helmet was carried out by the gates through which the dead are taken out. These events caused absolutely every one of us to believe that we were surely about to be rid of him

      So...did he predict his death?

    3. Cleander, accordingly, was obtaining money from every source, and he amassed more wealth than any who had ever been named cubicularii. A great deal it he gave to Commodus and his concubines, and he spent a great deal on houses, baths, and other works of benefit either to individuals or to cities.

      It's all about the welath

    4. A statue was set up to Victorinus,8 who had been prefect of the city. He had not died as the victim of any plot; in fact, at one time, when a persistent rumour and many reports, one may almost say, were being circulated about his death, he became emboldened, and approaching Perennis, said: "I hear that you men wish to kill me. Why, then, do you delay? Why do you put it off, when you might do it this very day?" 2 Yet not even after that was he molested by any outside person, but he took his own life; and yet he had been honoured among the foremost men by Marcus, both in point of moral  p95 excellence and forensic eloquence stood second to none of his contemporaries. Indeed, two incidents that I shall now relate will reveal his whole character. 3 When he was governor of Germany at one time, he at first attempted by private persuasion at home to induce his lieutenant not to accept bribes; but when the latter would not listen to him, he mounted the tribunal, and after bidding the herald proclaim silence, took oath that he had never accepted bribes and never would. 4 Then he bade the lieutenant take the same oath, and when the other refused to perjure himself, he ordered him to resign his office. And later, when he was governor of Africa and had an associate of similar character to the man just mentioned, though he did not adopt the same method, he nevertheless put him on board a ship and sent him back to Rome. Such, then, was the character of Victorinus.

      Victorinus: a man of great morals/honor. He is my favorite person out of everyone mentioned in this book, and I really wished he's the type of emperor Rome had, not one of opposite nature

    5. Thus, though nature had made him like Condianus in appearance and practice had made him similar in other respects, yet he did not share in his learning.

      Haha, lesson learned. Do your homework

    6. Commodus was guilty of many unseemly deeds, and killed a great many people

      I want to know what exactly made him change his nature. Was it just sudden that he started killing people, or was it a development thru time or maybe a result of an event...because he seemed okay in the previous paragraph; he was making peace and then this part just leads straight into talking about him killing people

    7. and after making a truce with the barbarians he rushed to Rome; for he hated all exertion and craved the comfortable life of the city.

      He signed his soul to the devil

    8. The soldiers in Britain chose Priscus, a lieutenant, emperor; but he declined, saying: I am no more an emperor than you are soldiers

      Agreed. Those are the most unworthy to be soldiers I've ever read about.

    9. For nature in the first place had made him able to resist sleep, and he had developed this faculty by the discipline of fasting. 5 For in general he would never eat to satiety, and in order that he might not take his fill even of bread, he used to send to Rome for it

      I respect how serious and committed he is to his work, but how does he maintain the energy needed for a general if he doesn't eat in order to not sleep?

    10. until I learned that the brothers had been strangled, so to speak, by Commodus (who later emulated Hercules)

      I must say, strangling humans is a lot more unjust than strangling snakes (personal opinion)

    11. a boy strangling two serpents and a lion pursuing a fawn

      I remember the tale of Hercules strangling serpents that were sent to kill him. So is this saying Commodus is like Hercules/compared?

    12. Commodus also put Crispina to death, having become angry with her for some act of adultery. But before their execution both women were banished to the island of Capreae

      I'm confused. What is the point of banishing them if you're just going to kill them anyway?

    13. Commodus also killed Salvius Julianus and Tarrutenius Paternus, who was enrolled among the ex-consuls, and others with them, including even a woman of the nobility

      It shocks me that these actions don't have any consequences. It just shows how the distribution of power was so unbalanced. Reforms were much needed.

    14. On coming to Rome he addressed the senate, uttering a lot of trivialities; and among the various stories that he told in his own praise was one to this effect, 3 that once while out riding he had saved the life of his father, who had fallen into a deep quagmire

      Commodus does not find anyone except himself important/non-trivial. His ego is consistently shown throughout this reading

    15. 1 This man [Commodus] was not naturally wicked, but, on the contrary, as guileless as any man that ever lived. His great simplicity, however, together with his cowardice, made him the slave of his companions, and it was through them that he at first, out of ignorance, missed the better life and then was led on into lustful and cruel habits, which soon became second nature

      After reading the whole book, it is crazy to see how true these statements are. Commodus' inverted, simplistic nature drastically changed to a barbaric, blood/power-hungry killer. It really brings out the debate of nature vs nurture and in this case, I'd say it's very much nurture...but maybe both?

    16. poison, secretly

      Why by poison secretly? Seeing as he is a gladiator and ruler with power who loves open fights and could get away it, using poison doesn't fit his character.

    17. Commodus was wholly devoted to pleasure and gave himself up to chariot-racing, caring nothing for anything of that nature;7 and, indeed, if he had been deeply concerned, he would not have been able to administer them by reason of his indolence and his inexperience.

      pleasure = mass murder

    18. Commodus, taking a respite from his amusements and sports, turned to murder and was killing off the prominent men

      Further proving Commodus enjoyed the act of killing and was "shameless".

    19. 16 Now this "Golden One," this "Hercules," (this "god" (for he was even given this name, too) suddenly drove into Rome one afternoon from his suburb and conducted thirty horse-races in the space of two hours. These proceedings had much to do with his running short of funds. 2 He was also fond, it is true, of bestowing gifts, and frequently gave largesses to the populace at the rate of one hundred and forty denarii per man; but most of his expenditures were for the objects I have mentioned. Hence he brought accusations against both men and women, slaying some and to others selling their lives for their property.13 3 And finally he ordered us, our wives, and our children each to contribute two gold pieces14 every year on his birthday as a kind of first-fruits, and commanded the senators in all the other cities to give five denarii apiece. Of this, too, he saved nothing, but spent it all disgracefully on his wild beasts and his gladiators.

      This whole section says a few things about Commodus...he spends his money selfishly and carelessly, expecting it to fall from the sky or something. He does not care about the people and is truly spoiled. I cannot stress enough the hatred I have for him...a self absorbed, egocentric, arrogant "boy".

    20. 5 Now the death of these victims passed unheeded for Commodus was a greater curse to the Romans than any pestilence or any crime

      Reading all of this, I can confidently say that Emperors have WAY too much power. I wouldn't even call Commodus an Emperor; I'd call him a murderer.

    21. conspicuous wealth, distinguished family, unusual learning, or some other point of excellence

      It seems Commodus was envious of anyone better than him in one way or another. This just proves he was very careless about who he had killed, and he probably has no shame in doing these acts.

    22. when he heard that sentence of death had been pronounced against him, too, drank the blood of a hare

      I find this interesting, because it reminds me of the Cleopatra readings. Instead of letting himself be put to death by others, he chose to do it himself. Was this an act of self pride?

    23. Commodus was guilty of many unseemly deeds, and killed a great many people

      We can see character development. In the beginning, it was twice stated that Commodus "hated exertion and craved comfortable life in the city". Now, he has ditched that want.