Science has everything to say about what is possible. Science has nothing to say about what is permissible.
So, the big idea is that Obama isn't seeing the big idea of stem cell and this part of science is more important than you think.
7 Matching Annotations
- Sep 2016
-
www.realclearpolitics.com www.realclearpolitics.com
-
-
It was populated, as his didactic discourses always are, with a forest of straw men.
This phrase stands out for me because the author has an obvious wide vocabulary.
-
It is acquiescence to the mystique of "science" and its inherent moral benevolence.
I got lost here because I don't understand anything it said.
-
I am not religious. I do not believe that personhood is conferred upon conception. But I also do not believe that a human embryo is the moral equivalent of a hangnail and deserves no more respect than an appendix. Moreover, given the protean power of embryonic manipulation, the temptation it presents to science, and the well-recorded human propensity for evil even in the pursuit of good, lines must be drawn. I suggested the bright line prohibiting the deliberate creation of human embryos solely for the instrumental purpose of research -- a clear violation of the categorical imperative not to make a human life (even if only a potential human life) a means rather than an end.
In a nutshell, this says that our body parts aren't just body parts and that we should treat them with respect and have boundaries.
-
Bush had restricted federal funding for embryonic stem cell research to cells derived from embryos that had already been destroyed (as of his speech of Aug. 9, 2001). While I favor moving that moral line to additionally permit the use of spare fertility clinic embryos, Obama replaced it with no line at all. He pointedly left open the creation of cloned -- and noncloned sperm-and-egg-derived -- human embryos solely for the purpose of dismemberment and use for parts.
This reminds me of the horrifying movie The Human Centipede.
-
WASHINGTON -- Last week, the White House invited me to a signing ceremony overturning the Bush (43) executive order on stem cell research. I assume this was because I have long argued in these columns and during my five years on the President's Council on Bioethics that, contrary to the Bush policy, federal funding should be extended to research on embryonic stem cell lines derived from discarded embryos in fertility clinics. I declined to attend. Once you show your face at these things you become a tacit endorser of whatever they spring. My caution was vindicated
What is the Bush policy?
-
Last week, the White House invited me to a signing ceremony overturning the Bush (43) executive order on stem cell research.
I already know that stem cell research is arise by differentiation.
-