16 Matching Annotations
  1. Jun 2022
    1. As with the ClinVar set, all missense variants from genes without asingle pathogenic variant of any type in ClinVar were removed.

      is this reasonable, is this different from how the tool creators did their accuracy assessments?

    2. the ClinVar 2019 set

      isn’t this basically just predicting pathogenicity based on being in Clinvar? and with 1 star level being considered pathogenic?

    3. Among these, all VUS, variants with a zero-star reviewstatus, i.e., without any detailed review information, and those with conflicting classificationswere excluded

      dodgy labs might mark variant as pathogenic and link to assessment criteria but apply them wrongly. These might be detected if other labs post conflicting assessments. But for ultrarare variants, no other lab might have submitted that variant

  2. Aug 2020
  3. Sep 2019
  4. Jun 2018
  5. Nov 2017