32 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2019
    1. but if that’s what you want to spend money on, you don’t also need to dig a tunnel.

      did not justify this?

    2. maybe we should wait until they have better reasons for why a larger collider might find something new

      i agree partially

    3. prediction is just a guess

      That is the definition of a prediction?

    4. based on facts, not on shiny advertising

      this is true but science is based on making predictions and then exploring them

    5. “is obviously addressed to politicians and not fellow physicists and uses the same arguments as those used to promote the L.H.C. in the ’90s.”

      just trying to get funding

    6. the origin of the universe.

      these statements are very definite

    7. Yes, it is possible that a new collider finds a particle that makes up dark matter, but there is no particular reason to think it will.

      False advertising or just hope for scientific discovery?

    8. 15 orders of magnitude above the currently accessible energies.

      need much stronger forces

    9. merely noise

      Predictions are not always correct. Einstein and his light bulb

    10. In case you were wondering, yes, that’s exactly why I left the field.

      placing personal experiences to increase the doubt the author has in this field.

    11. Those predictions were wrong — that much is now clear.

      its okay to be wrong in science, but this author is very harsh about it

    12. Before the L.H.C. started operation, particle physicists had more exciting predictions than that. They thought that other new particles would also appear near the energy at which the Higgs boson could be produced. They also thought that the L.H.C. would see evidence for new dimensions of space. They further hoped that this mammoth collider would deliver clues about the nature of dark matter (which astrophysicists think constitutes 85 percent of the matter in the universe) or about a unified force.

      other predictions that could eventually come to rise

    13. let’s be honest: It’s disappointing.

      very informal diction for someone who used to be a particle physicist

    14. knowledge about the structure of the proton, and they’ve seen new (albeit unstable) composite particles

      there are other benefits

    15. only discovery made at the L.H.C.

      is this one conformation worth the cost?

    16. In 2012, experiments at the L.H.C. confirmed the discovery of the Higgs boson — a prediction that dates back to the 1960s

      thats a significant accomplishment

    17. $10 billion is a hefty price tag.

      however Dr. Hossenfelder does not agree the cost outweighs the benefits

    18. I still believe that slamming particles into one another is the most promising route to understanding what matter is made of and how it holds together

      agrees with the intentions and logic behind the scientific reasons

    19. I used to be a particle physicist. For my Ph.D. thesis

      ethos

    20. $10 billion.

      double the price

    21. even larger collider.

      imagine how much that would cost to upkeep

    22. second experimental run completed

      its been running for almost eleven years, thats about 10 billion dollars!! In that amount of time only two runs have been completed.

    23. With a $5 billion price tag and a $1 billion annual operation cost, the L.H.C. is the most expensive instrument ever built

      That is intense. 5 billion $ to build, yet it cost 1 billion to upkeep.

    24. protons collide at almost the speed of light

      3.00 E8 m/s

    25. 16-mile-long underground ring

      does not take up usable land because it is underground

    26. world’s largest

      Interesting because even though it is the largest it still hasn't allowed scientists to accomplish their goals

    27. failed to deliver the exciting discoveries that scientists promised.

      Did the scientists actually promise such things, or is the author over exaggerating?

    1. Setting in motion this MetroHealth expansion was the mid-2017 closure of the maternity ward at the Cleveland Clinic's Medina Hospital, leaving Medina County without its own center for labor and delivery services

      vulnerable

    2. word

      needle in haystack ordeal

    3. Making MetroHealth expansion legally possible via an unpublicized add-on to an unrelated bill, without public debate, discussion or hearings, is poor policy, plain and simple.

      bad politics, easy way around the system

    4. in theory

      good intentions?

    5. to help Medina County get maternity services from MetroHealth.

      purpose of the provisions