32 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2019
    1. “is obviously addressed to politicians and not fellow physicists and uses the same arguments as those used to promote the L.H.C. in the ’90s.”

      just trying to get funding

    2. Yes, it is possible that a new collider finds a particle that makes up dark matter, but there is no particular reason to think it will.

      False advertising or just hope for scientific discovery?

    3. In case you were wondering, yes, that’s exactly why I left the field.

      placing personal experiences to increase the doubt the author has in this field.

    4. Before the L.H.C. started operation, particle physicists had more exciting predictions than that. They thought that other new particles would also appear near the energy at which the Higgs boson could be produced. They also thought that the L.H.C. would see evidence for new dimensions of space. They further hoped that this mammoth collider would deliver clues about the nature of dark matter (which astrophysicists think constitutes 85 percent of the matter in the universe) or about a unified force.

      other predictions that could eventually come to rise

    5. In 2012, experiments at the L.H.C. confirmed the discovery of the Higgs boson — a prediction that dates back to the 1960s

      thats a significant accomplishment

    6. I still believe that slamming particles into one another is the most promising route to understanding what matter is made of and how it holds together

      agrees with the intentions and logic behind the scientific reasons

    7. second experimental run completed

      its been running for almost eleven years, thats about 10 billion dollars!! In that amount of time only two runs have been completed.

    8. With a $5 billion price tag and a $1 billion annual operation cost, the L.H.C. is the most expensive instrument ever built

      That is intense. 5 billion $ to build, yet it cost 1 billion to upkeep.

    9. failed to deliver the exciting discoveries that scientists promised.

      Did the scientists actually promise such things, or is the author over exaggerating?

    1. Setting in motion this MetroHealth expansion was the mid-2017 closure of the maternity ward at the Cleveland Clinic's Medina Hospital, leaving Medina County without its own center for labor and delivery services

      vulnerable

    2. Making MetroHealth expansion legally possible via an unpublicized add-on to an unrelated bill, without public debate, discussion or hearings, is poor policy, plain and simple.

      bad politics, easy way around the system