63 Matching Annotations
  1. Jun 2022
    1. Fatherhood can be such a wonderful thing for both fathers and children, but all too often it is a relationship structured by the ugly power dynamics of patriarchy, marked by broken relationships, emotional distance, and psychological, physical, and sexual abuse.

      I'm grateful for this thinking. The commercial sales pitch for Father's Day is aggressive in its hegemony -- the disconnected father celebrated on the one day a year he is made to engage. This reflection reminds me of the ethos of the origins of Mother's Day, started by peace activists and public health advocates. It was about the unique position of the mother to advocate against the meaningless deaths of her children -- especially sons in war. What is the equivalent ethos for Father's Day, a day whose roots are deeply entrenched in Catholicism and patriarchy?

  2. Feb 2022
    1. encouraging the integration of different teaching methods and forms of assessment to motivate the active use, creation and sharing of OER; and assessing the impact of OER on inclusive and equitable quality education;

      I think we are still in need of education and awareness around educational practice and why this move is important. So encouragement, yes, but also hard conversations about why. I think it's easy to get to the point where we think the conversation is done and we're just implementing, but in my day to day experience many faculty still don't know about their textbook costs or how many homework systems an average student in the program is paying for.

    2. properly recognize OER creation as a professional or academic merit

      Our tenure and promotion processes at TRU are expanding to include OER development as evidence of an "expanding sphere of influence" in teaching and learning practice for purposes of tenure and promotion. See examples of how to draft this language: https://www.tru.ca/__shared/assets/LDI_T_and_P_Standards53626.pdf

  3. Oct 2021
    1. To do so, we need to stop thinking of external reality as more valuable than subjectivity, to stop treating subjectivity as a barrier to overcome. Let’s embrace it as the human condition, treat ourselves and our students as whole, absolutely subjective, human beings, and see where that takes us.

      What would this look like in your teaching and learning?

    2. He explains how this mindset shift made him focus less on how to mark down a student, and instead, how to help them make their work better.

      Department culture shapes a lot of this, too. Have you ever worked somewhere where you felt the department culture pushed your grades down (or up)?

    3. Speaking of grades, I do not mean to suggest that students can just each give themselves a grade and consider it good enough (though you could try that, I guess), but it also means that our authority as teachers is not the absolute and only valid judgment of the student’s learning. It implies a more complex negotiation of what it means for a student to have learned: a dialogical, emergent understanding that is not based on pre-defined rubrics or arbitrary numbers and letters. It also suggests an openness to questioning what it means when we emphasize certain things in a grade, or when we try to “order” students in terms of who performed better or worse.

      It's easy for us in a lot of ways, because this is a PD course, but this is how we've approached the evaluation structure for this course: it's more about your narrative of what you've learned than it is about ours.

    4. But it has a more advanced stage called “contextual relativism” which implies that what is more or less true depends on the context.

      Ah, what a helpful concept.

    5. Interpretive and critical research, on the other hand, clarifies the researcher’s subjectivity. In fact, it makes subjectivity central to what the research presents and represents. It offers readers the agency to judge for themselves which parts of the research to take or leave.

      We need this information to make determinations about the applicability of findings to our own contexts -- and also whether we trust the source. But I find having this conversation with students -- explaining that the concept of objectivity is illusory -- is really, really hard. Have you had this experience?

    6. I beg to differ.

      Me toooo! This point is so good.

    7. Raising consciousness is sometimes about asking, “What is wrong with…?” from a social justice perspective.

      Can you be "objective" and pursue equity? Or can objectivity only describe the world as it is?

    8. This explicit non-neutrality is a characteristic of critical pedagogy.

      Critical pedagogy is often about recognizing the systems that impact upon teaching; as a result, it recognizes (and hopes to dismantle) inequalities.

    9. But believe me: pretending to be objective or neutral only hides our subjectivity, it does not actually remove it.

      This is such an important distinction. Is anyone truly "neutral"? And whose bodies have the luxury of being read as "neutral."

    1. Transactional models of education identify students as consumers and teachers as retail workers who must please their customers (an inhumane model for retail sales as well as the world of learning).

      The hard question: how does our practice of resistance work within a transactional system?

    2. For many years I taught with the idea that there was a well-established, academic norm that was fair and impartial, and my job was to make accommodations available for those students who had particular disabilities, or faced particular challenges in meeting that norm. I no longer believe in such a practice.

      What would the academic norm be for your discipline? Do you feel it is fair and impartial? Could there be a way to make it so?

    3. basic terminology around which there was confusion

      Often huge for people new to a discipline, and many will never volunteer this confusion without being asked.

    4. There’s an obvious chance that I could be taken advantage of in this scenario, that someone could straight-up lie and get away with it.

      We are (many of us) acculturated to worry about students "taking advantage" of us. Why?

    5. And when we are urged to be kind within an educational setting, it’s too often to make up for a lack of institutional support for students and faculty in need, asking a particular service of women and non-binary individuals of all races, and men of color. Kindness can be a band aid we’re urged to plaster over deep fissures in our institutions, wielded as a weapon instead of as a balm. And too often people confuse kindness with simply “being nice.”

      We have see care administered by individuals used as a kind of band-aid for much of this pandemic. What kindnesses that impacted student experience were delivered by labour and effort of instructors, versus change to the institution?

    6. rigor

      This word drives me batty because it is meant to sound, ha, rigorous, but is actually staggeringly subjective.

    7. I took a good long look at my syllabus, and realized I had communicated everything in it from a position of absolute authority. The language I used to describe the college’s Honor Code, for example, expressed the suspicion that everyone was going to commit some awful academic offense at some point, and my attendance policy made no room for the idea that my students were adults with complicated lives who would need to miss a class now and again.

      Oof. I feel this in my whole chest! My syllabi often looked this way too, for quite a long time.

    8. From the pronoun buttons available at the registration desk, to the probing questions of the session leaders, to the time people took, one-on-one, to talk about syllabi and assignments, there was an ethos of care running through the whole four days of my residency.

      I like thinking about the ways we demonstrate care and how we show our learners that we want them to succeed. These are all lovely examples. What does this look like in your classroom?

    9. I was once advised by a senior graduate student to “be a bitch” on the first day of class so that my students never wanted that version of myself to show up again, advice that I dutifully repeated to several of the graduate students who came after me.

      I am interested in the gender dynamics at play in this advice (I got it, too!).

    1. We realize that for some instructors these new practices will be easy to incorporate into their pedagogies; others will find these practices overwhelming, even as we’ve tried to anticipate such concerns.

      Where do you fall?

    2. When we proactively provide captions on all essential video content, it not only ensures that students with disabilities are included but provides a more robust experience for any student who might wish to access the video from a variety of contexts, such as those listed above.

      We also know that Gen-Z students prefer captioned video (and expect it): https://onezero.medium.com/why-gen-z-loves-closed-captioning-ec4e44b8d02f

    3. Getting closed captions on your video is doable, and there are resources available to help do this that will not drain your time. This section is meant to explain the benefits of closed captions and how to make sure the videos in your class are more inclusive.

      There are resources available to show you how to use Kaltura for this purpose: https://media.tru.ca/id/0_hgjontp4?width=608&height=402&playerId=23451100

    4. But again, disability resource centers and the accommodation process are important, and some students will require official accommodations no matter what, but adhering to an inclusive design philosophy proactively anticipates that no student has the exact same experience as another.

      We're also very aware that not all students with needs will be able to access accommodation, for a range of reasons from familial/cultural to financial.

    5. making sure all videos used in the class have closed captions, using larger and more readable fonts in their materials, and providing clear headings and hierarchies of information in their syllabi and assignments.

      Are any of these strategies ones you are using in class?

    6. Inclusive design is different from traditional accessibility efforts because the former is proactive and the latter reactive

      What would being proactive (instead of reactive) look like in your own contexts?

    7. One of the best ways to improve your accessibility is through universal design or, even better, inclusive design.

      Many of the strategies we've been discussing in class really come from UDL ways of thinking.

    1. The ideologies underlying many of our traditional spaces and traditional practices often fail to take disability into account.

      Something for us all to interrogate in our own practice.

    2. The issue of screens, though, does not only affect those denied them. Students with Attention Deficit Disorder and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder might find the distractions of a large lecture space difficult to overcome, and these distractions are likely increased by the screens of fellow students. So what’s the answer?

      One way I used to try to resolve this was to ask students using laptops to sit in the outer ring of the three-ring horseshoe I turned my classroom into. But of course, not all classes have moveable furniture.

    3. “granting an accommodation was seen as less fair than not granting one” (27).

      We have had this claim made by students at our own institution.

    4. it forces students to out themselves as a person with a disability, which can come with considerable stigma.

      This is my big issue. I think it's not right to decide when and how a student discloses information about themselves.

    5. Can any pedagogy be sound if it doesn’t fully incorporate people with disabilities?

      What does inclusive pedagogy look like?

    6. It is about the assumptions instructors make about students.

      Interrogating our own biases is hard but critical work. I wonder what biases you might bring to the classroom? This is a helpful continuation of last week's discussion.

  4. Sep 2021
    1. A key to successful assessment is giving students a clear understanding of what the expectations are for their work. This is especially important for alternative assessments. Rubrics, especially those that are given alongside an assignment description, are a great way of guiding students towards success. They can also be used to provide feedback to students, strengthening the formative component of any assessment method.

      Often the hardest part of planning an alternative assessment is to decide how to evaluate it. Rubrics can really help you think this part through.

    2. Examples of Authentic or Alternative Assignments

      Try to think of an example (including one from the list below) that would be particularly applicable to your discipline.

    3. The traditional form of assessment in the post-secondary course is a mid-term or final or exam.

      Be sure to think about what the standard -- and therefore the alternative! -- is in your discipline.

    1. It’s one we need to answer

      We invite you to think about how technology complements your values as a teacher and helps you achieve your pedagogical goals -- not supplant them.

    2. No educational technology has answered or can answer that question.

      We will come back to this idea when we talk about ethics and edtech.

    3. Turns out, it was the human experience that persisted.

      The modality doesn't shift the fact that learning is an intensely human -- and humane! -- activity. We'll work to make sure the technology doesn't get in the way of that.

    4. teach through the screen, not to the screen. Find out where your students are, and make your classroom there, in a multiplicity of places.

      What might the difference be between teaching to and teaching through a screen? How might we communicate that intent to students?

    1. in ways that centre care and justice

      Not to be that guy who cites himself (I have more of a comment than a question), but I thought I'd share this piece I published recently about the cost of care and the pandemic: The End is the Beginning, and Yet You Go On

    2. Some of the approaches I’ve adopted in the last year have been dismal failures

      Bravery is also discussing failure.

    3. let go of my ego and embrace discomfort

      It seems to me that the teacherly ego, which so often drives us to the front of the class, to draw on surveillance tools, to centre control. It seems that all those things get in the way of learning.

  5. Nov 2020
    1. right to expect

      Agree! So link to me the policy right here so I can confirm this is the case. In general, I worry that a document like this obfuscates rather than clarifies the specific policies student data is party to. I would rather see ProctorU design an easy-to-read explanation of its policies, along with easy and explicit opt-out links, than a document like this that seems designed to foster good will over clarity.

    2. REVIEW AND UNDERSTAND POLICIES KEEPING OTHERS FROM DISADVANTAGING YOU

      You have the right to review and understand policies? This is very interesting wording. Also, what does being "disadvantaged" look like in this context? If my internet connection flakes out, if my proctor misunderstands my behaviour, if I don't perform well in high-stakes arenas, these too are "disadvantages," surely.

    1. total learning integrity

      This implies integrity of assessment is limited to our ability to surveil it. How can we work to expand the conversation about Academic Integrity beyond the technical tools?

  6. Mar 2020
    1. H5P

      Can we separate this into a section (on the same page) of additional resources?

    2. Course Readings

      How would you feel about us adding the Digital Detox as a course reading? Maybe for the next iteration? Overall I love what you've done with this page.

    1. We aim to present the most significant theorists and readings in a way that they are accessible to people that have not completed an educational technology program.

      Can we rewrire this? How about, "Are you wondering about the thinking that underlies the work we do, or are you looking for more resources and documentation on the tools we support? You can find that material here."

    2. Policy

      Do we need to remind Brian about his pieces? Do you want to save this for next iteration?

    3. Midterm

      Tech Tools for Feedback; Memes and Gifs

    4. Pre-semester

      Learning in the Open; Chatbot; Master Your Moodle

    5. Semester start

      H5P; Learning in the Open

    6. Reflective practice

      Scholarly Podcasting

    7. Professional development

      Community of Practice Series

    8. Course Calendar

      Love what you've done for your portfolio version already. Gonna note what I'm thinking for how we'll map on workshops to this.

    1. End of Semester

      When we pivot to the next iteration, I want to run with what you've done here and add a section on reflective practice in the open.

    2. Course Readings

      JAMIE THIS IS SO GOOD I HADN'T SEEN IT YET

    1. What are some philosophical underpinnings, for example, why do we run workshops rather than classes, pedagogy?

      Maybe we should lead with this one?

    2. Course Objectives

      Are you happy with this for your course needs? How can I help with it? I think we've discussed that it's a bit text-heavy for the final version, but we have lots of time before we get there.

    1. References

      I am so happy to see how you've integrated the references.

  7. Dec 2019
    1. As Good or Better than Commercial Textbooks:Students’ Perceptions and Outcomes from UsingOpen Digital and Open Print Textbooks

      Test