Us (NPC) vs moneymakers, corporate companies (the game)

I find this specific selection interesting as games can be considered wrong. To me, I feel like games and their specific features could be subjective, and whether it can be enjoyed depends on individual players.

As someone who started using the internet an unusually early age, I can say that this infrastructural violence literally applies to everybody. Content is marketed towards literally every existing human on Earth, and there isn't really a way to avoid it.

I believe that Facebook's policies and guidelines changed shortly after this event regarding filters and safety

I love how this is worded, because while the character is being controlled by the player, that does not mean the player IS the character, nor do they have the same abilities or traits.

I find it really interesting that video game creators can make statements within their games without its players even really realizing it. These real world biases can be seen in multiple different patterns as well.

The second paragraph on page 1 helps explain ergodic literature, but I'm wondering -- can ergodic literature go from nonergodic to ergodic based on time? What about language barriers?

Its easier for me to understand this concept when I say that state fits into constraint based on the individual choices made by the player.

I never really considered the accessibility that cell phones have -- regardless of social class or income, it is incredibly common for everybody to have a cell phone, I would even consider it a basic necessity because it allows for basic communication.

"We're a generation of idiots -- smartphones and dumb people."

I really appreciate this specific line, although blunt. I understand the general message of this video, but there are several points that I disagree with. Our world is constantly changing, and I do not think that deleting all of our social media would necessarily be beneficial.