69 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. The latest Claude models, if asked to add two numbers together and then queried on how they did it, will still claim to use the standard “carry ones” algorithm for it.

      What else are they expecting? Unless they have a way to aceess the weights and activations how can they answer this qn

  2. Nov 2025
  3. May 2025
  4. Apr 2025
    1. or instance, you’ll find prominent names like Ryan A. Rossi and Jiliang Tang leading the charge. Rossi’s work on graph analytics and network science and Tang’s extensive research in graph neural networks and representation learning are key pillars in this space. Their research is not only advancing the theoretical frameworks behind GraphRAG but also paving the way for its real-world implementations in areas such as healthcare (e.g., integrating patient records and medical literature for better diagnostics), finance (like fraud detection by connecting disparate transaction data), legal tech (streamlining case research through connected legal precedents), and even e-commerce (delivering smarter, context-aware recommendations).

      I should reach out to them

  5. Sep 2021
    1. Linking the energetically unfavorable reaction A → B to a second, favorable reaction B →C will shift the equilibrium constant for the first reaction.

      I think it's true because the \(\Delta G \degree\) changes

    2. Does a Snickers™ candy bar (65 g, 1360 kJ) pro-vide enough energy to climb from Zermatt (elevation 1660 m) to the top of the Matterhorn (4478 m, Figure Q2–3), or might you need to stop at HÖrnli Hut (3260 m) to eat another one?

      We would have to stop in between

      >>> e = 75 * 9.8 * (4478 - 1660)
      >>> e
      2071230.0
      >>> e - 1360000
      711230.0
      >>> e = 75 * 9.8 * (3260 - 1660)
      >>> e - 1360000
      -184000.0
      
    3. Assuming that there are 5 × 1013 cells in the human body and that ATP is turning over at a rate of 109 ATP molecules per minute in each cell, how many watts is the human body consuming? (A watt is a joule per second.) Assume that hydrolysis of ATP yields 50 kJ/mole
      >>> 5/6.022
      0.8302889405513119
      >>> m = 5/6.022 * 0.1
      >>> p = m * 50 * 10**3
      >>> p
      4151.44470275656
      >>> p /60
      69.19074504594268
      
    4. Calculate the instantaneous velocity of a water molecule (molecular mass = 18 daltons),
      >>> v(18)
      4.875106836436168e-08
      >>> v(18) * 10**-5 * 3600
      1.7550384611170207e-09
      >>> v(180)
      1.5416441439796234e-08
      >>> v(15000)
      1.6887865466067637e-09
      
    5. he criterion for whether a reaction proceeds spontaneously is ΔG not ΔG°, because ΔG takes into account the concentrations of the substrates and product

      True

    6. aTp hydrolysis

      Biological hydrolysis is the cleavage of biomolecules where a water molecule is consumed to effect the separation of a larger molecule into component parts

    7. As with acetyl CoA, this handle portion very often con-tains a nucleotide (usually adenosine), a curious fact that may be a relic from an early stage of evolution. It is currently thought that the main catalysts for early life-forms—before DNA or proteins—were RNA molecules (or their close rela-tives), as described in Chapter 6. It is tempting to speculate that many of the car-rier molecules that we find today originated in this earlier RNA world, where their nucleotide portions could have been useful for binding them to RNA enzymes (ribozymes)

      Abiogenisis speculations

    8. We have previously discussed one way in which an energetically favorable reac-tion can be coupled to an energetically unfavorable reaction, X → Y, so as to enable it to occur. In that scheme, a second enzyme catalyzes the energetically favorable reaction Y → Z, pulling all of the X to Y in the process.

      I don't really get how this can happen

    9. because the overall free-energy change for a set of coupled reac-tions is the sum of the free-energy changes in each of its component steps.

      Even though this explains why something is possible, it is not entirely clear as to why it was selected in the first place?

    10. In the course of the chemical reactions that generate order, the cell converts part of the energy it uses into heat. The heat is discharged into the cell’s environment and disorders the surroundings. As a result, the total entropy—that of the cell plus its surroundings—increases, as demanded by the second law of thermodynamics.

      Thermo doubt. If the cell takes in energy E and releases as heat H. Then the total change in energy of the system due to the cell is H - E, right? But the cell can't release more heat than it takes so H - E < 0. In that case how can the entropy increase overall?

    11. Conversely, energetically unfavorable reac-tions with a positive ∆G—such as the joining of two amino acids to form a peptide bond—by themselves create order in the universe. Therefore, these reactions can take place only if they are coupled to a second reaction with a negative∆G so large that the ∆G of the overall process is negative

      Very Important point

    12. enzymes cannot change the equilibrium point for reactions. enzymes, likeallcatalysts, speed up theforward and backward ratesofa reaction by thesamefactor. Therefore, for both the catalyzed and the uncatalyzed reactionsshownhere, thenumber ofmolecules undergoing the transition X → Y isequal to thenumber ofmolecules undergoing the transition Y → X when theratioof Y molecules to X moleculesis 3 to 1. inother words, the two reactions reachequilibriumat exactly thesamepoint

      Doubt: This is confusing

    13. Raising the temperature willalsoincrease thenumber ofmolecules withsufficient energy toovercome theactivationenergy needed for a reaction; but inmarked contrast toenzyme catalysis, thiseffect isnonselective, speeding upall reactions

      Heating can't target which reactions should happen

  6. Aug 2021
    1. it takes in energy from its environment in the form of food, or as photons from the sun

      If the energy taken in greater than the energy released then how does the total entropy of the system (cell + env.) increase?

    1. great time in the course so far so this week we will be focusing on searching and sorting based problems of course these are really really fundamental techniques

      This course is awesome!

    1. hi welcome to the nptel course on getting started with competitive programming this is the first week of the course and this is the very first video so let me

      This course is awesome!

    1. 1–11

      From this previous paragraph -

      Horizontal transfers leave a characteristic imprint: they result in individuals who are related more closely to one set of relatives with respect to some genes, and more closely to another set of relatives with respect to others.

      then nematodes and legumes must be nearer than one shown in this tree.

    2. Why would the complexity of the underlying pro-cess—informational or metabolic—have any effect on the rate of horizontal gene transfer

      Higher complexity means that there is more potential for things to go wrong and harder to fix things when something goes wrong.

    3. Where is the “food,” for example, in the mixture of chemicals (H2S, H2, CO, Mn+, Fe2+, Ni2+, CH4, and NH4+) that spews from a hydrothermal vent?

      Energy from breaking bonds?

      \(Fe^{2+}\) can undergo rusting which generates heat

    4. 1–4

      From the given information, I find the accident hypothesis to be quite likely compared to natural selection.

      Argument in favor of the accident hypothesis

      Suppose the probability of finding a code more resistant (let's call it good) than the natural code in a single year is \(p = 10^{-6}\).

      Then the probability that we find at least one good code in \(n\) years is \(1 - (1 - p)^n\). Trying it for different values of \(n\), we get the following

      As we can see even with a million years we are getting reasonably high probabilities (~66%). On the contrary, the earliest undisputed evidence of life on Earth dates from at least 3.5 billion years ago and the age of earth being 4.5 billion years. Which leaves us with a period of 1 billion between the two. This highly favors the accident hypothesis.

      Assumptions

      I assumed that genetic codes are generated each year uniformly at random. This need not be necessarily true as there can be other factors which affect the generation of codes.

  7. Jul 2021
    1. 1–5

      We could probably sequence the genome and compare it with earth based ones for any homologs. If there is a close match then I guess we can conclude that it must have been a contamination.

    2. A very simple regulatory circuit—a single gene regulating its own expression by the binding of its protein product to its own regulatory DNA

      This is confusing, can someone explain it in more simpler terms?

    3. The vertebrate Genome Is a Product of Repeated duplications

      Can there be a case where 2 very different genes converge to a very similar gene later in evolution.

      Suppose 2 different species have \(G_1, G_2\) genes respectively. Now we have something like this in the course of evolution \(G_1 \rightarrow G\) and \(G_2 \rightarrow G\). In this case even though our analysis would say that these 2 species are related (because of common gene \(G\)) they aren't actually. Can something like this happen or am I missing something?

    4. The results, as we see later in the book, reveal an astonishing degree of similarity in the molecular mechanisms that govern insect and vertebrate devel-opment

      I see ... so this is how it was useful for studying vertebrate development

    5. The control system that governs this process has been so well conserved over the course of evolution that many of its components can function interchangeably in yeast and human cells: if a mutant yeast lacking an essential yeast cell-division-cycle gene is supplied with a copy of the homologous cell-division-cycle gene from a human, the yeast is cured of its defect and becomes able to divide normally

      Wow!

    6. The expanded genome of eukaryotes therefore not only specifies the hardware of the cell, but also stores the software that controls how that hardware is used

      Even they couldn't resist the analogy

    7. he DNA is not just a shopping list specifying the mol-ecules that every cell must have, and the cell is not an assembly of all the items on the list. Rather, the cell behaves as a multipurpose machine, with sensors to receive environmental signals and with highly developed abilities to call different sets of genes into action according to the sequences of signals to which the cell has been exposed.

      So this is how each cell differentiates?

    8. Even in compact eukaryotic genomes such as that of puffer fish, there is more noncoding DNA than coding DNA, and at least some of the noncoding DNA cer-tainly has important functions. In particular, it regulates the expression of adja-cent genes. With this regulatory DNA, eukaryotes have evolved distinctive ways of controlling when and where a gene is brought into play. This sophisticated gene regulation is crucial for the formation of complex multicellular organisms.

      Sounds like higher order functions. Instead of mapping \(G_a \rightarrow P_a\), we now have \(G_a \rightarrow f(G_b)\) ?

    9. On a longer time scale, the results can be even more pro-found; it has been estimated that at least 18% of all of the genes in the present-day genome of E. coli have been acquired by horizontal transfer from another species within the past 100 million years

      Does that mean that the concept of species means somethings quite different for prokaryotes?

    10. Both in the storage and in the copying of genetic information, random accidents and errors occur, altering the nucleotide sequence—that is, creating mutations

      Are these the only ways to create a mutation? Can it also be induced explicitly by the cell somehow?

    11. Although the chemical details vary, the hydrophobic tails of the predominant membrane molecules in all cells are hydrocarbon polymers (–CH2–CH2–CH2–), and their spontaneous assembly into a bilayered vesicle is but one of many exam-ples of an important general principle: cells produce molecules whose chemical properties cause them to self-assemble into the structures that a cell needs.

      So that free energy is used efficiently?

    12. . Such molecules placed in water aggregate spontaneously, arranging their hydropho-bic portions to be as much in contact with one another as possible to hide them from the water, while keeping their hydrophilic portions exposed.

      Isn't this how soap works?

    13. Each type of tRNA becomes attached at one end to a specific amino acid, and displays at its other end a specific sequence of three nucleotides—an anticodon—

      What exactly does the RNA do?

  8. Mar 2021