Remove the first alternative! Interferes with the next exploratory steps!

unclear why "equality" and not "equity" is used here

somewhat too strong statement?

What is the foundation of this statement? This seems to be at least partly a guess, or was there an additional question on their perception of the current status?

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics: seit 2021 nicht mehr von Springer publiziert, nun OA, siehe: https://jtap.srbiau.ac.ir/

Sollte ein Inklusionskriterium nicht sein, dass im gesamten Zeitraum 2017-2022 die Zss. von Springer publiziert wurde?

Not sure what "before" and "after" is supposed to mean if there was no change in the data policy.

Korrektur: Thomson Reuters

Rebranded again under a new publisher name (Walsh Medical Media): https://www.walshmedicalmedia.com/advances-in-pharmacoepidemiology-drug-safety.html

This is the wrong figure: 10008+664 = 10672 of 16924 (62,7%) could be OA

Not through an agreement but when you check the OpenAPC dataset you will find a couple of papers in JMIR which were covered by German libraries (i.e. through institutional publication funds, co-funded by the German Research Foundation).

Final published version: McNamara, A., & Horton, N. J. (2017). Wrangling Categorical Data in R. The American Statistician, 72(1), 97–104. doi:10.1080/00031305.2017.1356375

preferred departure times, full and half hour and round minutes

Some kind of open peer review - public peer commenting - followed by revision and confidential/closed peer review

Also mention the repository finder, https://repositoryfinder.datacite.org/

Note: Clause similar to German copyright but the embargo is shorter, 6 months for STM, 12 months for HSS. In addition, it secures the publishers cannot restricts the rights for reuse of research data made public as part of the publication.

Google translate:

Article 30 Learn more about this article ...

Chapter III of Title III of Book V of the Research Code is supplemented by Article L. 533-4 as follows:

"Art. L. 533-4.-I.-When a scientific writing resulting from a research activity financed at least half by endowments of the State, local authorities or public institutions, by subsidies of agencies of national or EU funding is published in a periodical published at least once a year, the author, even after granting exclusive rights to a publisher, has the right to make available free of charge in an open format , digitally, subject to the agreement of any co-authors, the final version of the manuscript accepted for publication, provided that the publisher makes the manuscript available free of charge by digital means or, failing that, by the expiration of a period of time from the date of the first publication. This period is a maximum of six months for publication in the fields of science, technology and medicine and twelve months for the publication of the humanities and social sciences. 'The version made available pursuant to the first subparagraph may not be used for the purposes of a publishing activity of a commercial nature. "II.-When the data from a research activity financed at least half by endowments of the State, local authorities, public institutions, grants from national funding agencies or funds from the European Union are not protected by a specific right or regulation and have been made public by the researcher, the establishment or the research organization, their reuse is free. "III.-The publisher of a scientific writing mentioned in I can not limit the re-use of research data made public as part of its publication. "IV.-The provisions of this article are of public order and any clause contrary to them is deemed unwritten. "

Err in variable name - should be "count" not "value" in table2

For a paper from 2015, these are somewhat odd remarks.