Thebalance will change but will still have to bestruck.2018 The Author
increase need for adaptability among employers
Thebalance will change but will still have to bestruck.2018 The Author
increase need for adaptability among employers
Such remote operations of facilities andequipment will without doubt usher in thenext stage of remote working and collabora-
increased need for fwa tech
We had to integrate 10 different subsystems into the lab
short end of stick, may not always be feasible
urther technical development
change in fwas comes with increase for tech developments for fwas
searchers
researchers may get short end of stick
One major impediment, atleast for the life sciences, is thelimited scope for automationand remote operation in wetlab work
fwas look different across different fields of work
ntapped potent
getting more out of employees,
I also haveindividual meetings every week with eachlab member
dd
Nonetheless, scientists working remotely will usually have to become familiarwith tools more sophisticated than cellphones and chat channels, vital thoughthose ar
due diligence
he need for subsequent face-to-faceinteractions after people have met can bereduced by videoconferencing platforms
again change in the way face to face is handled
Even in high-energy physics whereremote collaboration has long been established, it works best when all participantshave at least met face-to-face,
mix of in person and remote
But remote [. ..J needs carefulmanaging to ensure that itenhances rather thandiminishes the quality of thework or the productivity ofthose who are still on site mostf h . ,,o t e time
proper due diligence needed for productive fwas (theme)
largely,a lack of interaction, project managementand stimulation through face-to-face contact
not all good (theme)
increasing preponderance ofanalytics work using software tools that areoften available through Internet or cloudbased services
change in labor landscape
n additional benefit ofremote working is that it givesstudents and researchers accessto state-of-the-art equipmentrather than making do withageing lab facilitie
students/researchers (students especially) show a focus on those behind the workforce.
n an attempt to attract and retain talented employees and enhance their competitiveness, employers worldwide have increasingly adopted flexible work arrangements (FWAs) for the benefit of both the organisation and its employees
employees at center
all for higherworkplace flexibility, force companies to unbind time and task from place, and raise theopportunity to adjust working practices to changing circumstances
change
esearch results revealed the main economic benefits of FWAs: more efficient use ofequipment, facilities, and office space; saving on electricity, water, paper and etc
birds-stone
The purpose of qualitative research was to find out employers’ attitude on the benefits ofFWAs in the context of sustainability
different layer under data, "attitude"
FWAs are really attractive for employees in economic, socialand environmental dimensions as they help to decrease costs for childcare, travelling towork, food, and outfit;
fwas unrestricts employees to be more productive in life in general
According to Gray (2014), the key to living more sustainably is mainly about the choicesthat individuals and society make, but having the option to adapt our work practices tosupport a more eco-friendly lifestyle can play a big part in enabling these choice
two way street (indiv. & society), birds-stone
etter work-life balance tends to lead tolower levels of stress and higher levels of satisfaction, makes a positive effect on mentaland physical health
theme across articles
mployees clearly gain from workplace flexibility not only because of economic matters.Working fewer hours, having flexible start and finish times make it easier for people totake public transport, ride or walk travelling between home and the workplace.
employees may feel more seen
WAs, when implemented after analysis and preparation effectively serve a triple purpos
"multiple birds, one stone"
lobal changes in technologies, economy, demography, composition of workforce andlife styles call for higher flexibility in work arrangement
theme
While the benefits of FWAs are commonly recognized, in every caseintroduction of flexible working practice implies a chang
"change" as a theme
Flexible work structures can have different combinations of temporal and placeflexibility
different ways to skin a cat. per each cat
ccording to Lambert, Marler, and Gueutal (2008), flexible work arrangement (FWA) isdefined as a set of employer provided benefits that permit employees some level ofcontrol over when and where they work outside of the standard workday
increased control over working arrangements may be a reason for higher productivity
Demand for individualized, employee-oriented arrangements and practices those permittemporal and spatial flexibility in work processes and help to fit changing environmentsand needs is constantly increasin
tending to needs of employees instead of setting their work parameters seen as a theme across articles
Until now quite many today’s workarrangements still carry the imprint of the Industrial Revolution
older thought processes may need to change with the changing working landscape
ecentralized andflexible work arrangements have been proclaimed by different researchers as a way forcompanies to reduce expenses, cope with variations in demand, and be more attractivefor employees
kill multiple birds with one stone
he challenge is in integrating issues of sustainability with products, services, processesand work practices companies
obstacle
employers can use flexible work to attract new talent, increase engagement and retain their best employees.
again wider talent pool than before
ere to sta
theme
Not all employees enjoy working from home. They may feel increased pressure to be productive or feel like they are always on the clock.
not better for every employee
Offering a flexible schedule allows employers to expand their talent search to include skilled workers in other locations and candidates who need to work from home for personal or family reasons.
broader talent pool, allows employees to find their productive self
art-time employment
not only working from home, different options
w is the time to explore how flexible work arrangements can benefit your organization
new sheriff in town
ocus on results, not face time:
unimportant things that were previously focused on were realized as unimportant. more effecient
mproved Retention and Recruitmen
more loyalty from employees when support is present
By allowing employees to work remotely, companies can reduce their office space requiremen
depth of benefits
mproved Health and WellB
again, better for employees = better for everyone
Moreover, the ability to work during one’s most productive hours can lead to increased engagement and improved performance
better for everyone
When employees feel trusted and empowered to manage their own time and workload, they are more likely to be satisfied with their jobs and engaged in their work
importance of support (theme)
nhanced Work-Life Balan
Positive for employees
If supervisors are notwilling to support FWAs or convey negative attitudes towards them, coworkers mayperpetuate these types of attitud
attitudes adding a depth of obstacles when choosing working arrangements
As employees often perceive organizational support through their supervisor, thisfinding suggests that organizational support is a construct of minimal influence whenemployees consider whether to leave the organization
not as important as you would think
Employees who telework can miss out on informal learning and interpersonal net-working, both of which can provide learning opportunities and potential careeradvancement
not all good
Supervisor awareness ofwork-family programs was found to influence the frequency of employee referralsmade to the programs
positivity follows positivity
Both formal and informal methods can conveyto employees the level of support that the organization is willing to provid
seen as a tool to gauge a company's support for their employees
found thatsupervisors who provided support and segmented the home and work domains wereperceived as strong work-life-friendly role model
stronger perceptions for supervisors who showed support
Positive effects on job satisfaction and health outcomes have been demonstratedwhen managers are supportive of work-family program
when support is present, positive results occur.
When there is a perceived lack of supervisor support for FWAs, employees whoparticipate in FWAs may experience disparities in rewards when compared to peer
"disparities"
) found that employees whoparticipated in FWAs were perceived as having less organizational commitment andexperienced negative career effects. Organizations with a long-hours culture createunaccommodating attitudes that are likely to discourage employees from making useof available work-life programs
importance of attitudes that management has towards fwas
Therefore, inconsistencies can arisewhen organizations advocate for flexible work policies while simultaneously devalu-ing employees who use them
more depth to essentials needed by employees
Flexibility availability has been defined as “theextent to which employees feel free to use such policies, whether formal or inform
not just simply fwa availability
pport for FWAs begins at the top (Martin & MacDonnell, 2012). Dick (2011) foundthat employee perceptions of organization support strongly influenced perceptions ofsupervisor support which was consistent with Shanock and Eisenberger’s (2006)results that perceived organizational support (POS) had a significant positive relation-ship with perceived supervisor support (PSS)
trickle down
However, the probability of the father being primarilyresponsible for childcare was significantly higher if they had the capability to work fromhome
more flexibility = more likeliness to care for children
Descriptive results (Table B) showed that almost a quarter (23%) of the fathers reportedbeing the primary person responsible for childcare, while about a quarter shared respon-sibility equally (26%) and half indicated the mother being primarily responsible (51%).
50% mother is responsible
Hypothesis 1:
get in where they fit in
ccordingly, they tend to protect the boundaries of their work-ing time and place even if working flexibly
more care for work from increased "stress of higher status"
Importantly, men in higher-income occupations tend to have more egalitarian views ongender roles
egalitarian: relating or believing in the principle that all people are equal and deserve equal rights
In contrast, men in lower-income occupations face higher sched-ule rigidity, frequent and unpredictable shift changes, and low organizational support
lower income = lower support
Fathers’ capabilities to work flexibly are further shaped by financial conditions.
a barrier to be fought
but they can reduce barriers that mightotherwise limit fathers’ involvement (Chung and Booker, 2023). Notwithstanding, finan-cial circumstances further complicate this dynamic
again, fwas seen as a tool to fight barriers
Utilizing FWAs for care canexpose deviation from the prevailing expectation that fathers, as ‘ideal workers’, areunburdened by caring responsibilities typically taken up by the women in their lives.Subsequently, men might be perceived as less committed (Coltrane et al., 2013) and suf-fer negative career repercussions (
men fighting an uphill battle vs. work and family. ultimatum
ccess to FWAs can be discouraged by managers, whostill commonly perceive FWAs as a ‘women’s issue’ (Borgkvist et al., 2021), but also byemployers and peers who tend to mock or oppose fathers who embrace active parenting
more obstacles for fathers exploring fwas
This research focuses on how gender(Beham et al., 2019; Chung, 2022; Kurowska, 2020) and financial conditions (Chung andBooker, 2023; Gerstel and Clawson, 2014) simultaneously shape fathers’ flexible workingvaluation, opportunities and use (Hobson and Fahlén, 2009).
more depth added to the decision of fwas
s involvementrequires fathers’ presence and participation in children’s lives, capabilities to controltheir paid working time and place could help them prioritize childcare responsibilities.
First mention as a means or tool to be a better parent
Fathers increasingly have (and are expected to have) simultaneous aspira-tions to provide indirect care and resources as well as being direct (physical) carers (i.e.caring ambition; Bear, 2019
torn between two
Using cross-sectional data capturing capabilities to care from Project CAPABLE, thisstudy explores how fathers’ actual opportunities for temporal flexibility (adjusting the
cross-sectional: data from multiple different sources (ie. income, country, job/position) offering a snapshot of a population or phenomenon
start/end time of their working day) and spatial flexibility (working from home) relate toprimary childcare responsibility.
how they are going about doing what they say they are trying to do in the main idea
This research aims to address this gap by providing a comprehensive frameworkthat integrates the literatures on fatherhood and flexibility through a capabilities lens
Main idea of article
Yet, research indicates a positive connection between workplace flexibilityand childcare involvement primarily among lower-income workers
higher income; more control over work environments, lower income; positive connection between fwas and childcare involvement among lower-income workers.
Particularly for fathers, work demands are inconstant tension with their caring ambitions, and thus their real opportunities for sig-nificant childcare involvement
The main decisions males looking for fwas face when choosing to or to not
Key barriers to men’s uptake of FWAs for care purposes include a lack of organiza-tional support and a fear of negative repercussions due to not conforming to ‘idealworker’ norms
2 main bad things associated with fwas (support from org, negative attitude from fwa choice)
Fathers’ involvement in childcare has transformed over the last decades. Beyond a bread-winner role, men increasingly expect and are expected to be caring, engaged fathers(Bear, 2019; Elliott, 2016).
one of the main ideas behind fwas
mployees who telework can miss out on informal learning and interpersonal net-working, both of which can provide learning opportunities and potential careeradvancement (Cooper & Kurland, 2002).
not all good outcomes from working from home
Both formal and informal methods can conveyto employees the level of support that the organization is willing to provid
also used as a tool to gauge the supportiveness of a company to it's employees
Immediatesupervisors can reduce the extent to which the work role of employees interferes withthe family role (Lapierre & Allen, 2006). Koch and Binnewies (2015) found thatsupervisors who provided support and segmented the home and work domains wereperceived as strong work-life-friendly role models.
the more support, the better
Positive effects on job satisfaction and health outcomes have been demonstratedwhen managers are supportive of work-family progra
proof in pudding
Organizations with a long-hours culture createunaccommodating attitudes that are likely to discourage employees from making useof available work-life programs (Beauregard & Henry, 2009).
more isn't always better
Employees will not participate in FWAs if they feel that doing so will jeopardizejob security, work assignments, or promotional possibilities
my above annotation
Therefore, inconsistencies can arisewhen organizations advocate for flexible work policies while simultaneously devalu-ing employees who use them (Putnam et al., 2014)
having fwa options while demeaning employees who use them is counterintuitive
Flexibility availability has been defined as “theextent to which employees feel free to use such policies, whether formal or informal”
need for support along with the option of fwas
Leschyshyn and Minnotte(2014) suggested that future research should pay closer attention to various forms ofsupport related to the enhancement of employee outcomes
focus on how they could make employees more efficient
Employers concerned about employee job satisfaction seek to provide opportuni-ties to enrich the workplace experience (Nicklin & McNall, 2013).
again, a tool for employees to perform better
more efficient.
fwa's seen as a tool rather than a chore for companies to implement
While the economy plunged, the needfor organizations to do what they could to keep progressing became imperative. As aresult, employees found themselves working from home, home-schooling their chil-dren, spending time on teleconference calls, changing their work completely to virtualinteractions, and logging in from home.
More things on the plates of employees made companies implement fwa's