Rhetoric as a perspective on perspectives can make us aware of what Burke called our "terministic screens"
Powerful conclusion - rhetoric helps us see our lenses
Rhetoric as a perspective on perspectives can make us aware of what Burke called our "terministic screens"
Powerful conclusion - rhetoric helps us see our lenses
We argue that rhetoric and art can equip us for dealing with such complexities
Their solution summarized
a more limited material that might be representative of human ways
Burke's "equipment for living" - why we need stories
The third ability for Nussbaum is to have a "narrative imagination"
Ability 3: Empathy through story - connects to CR storytelling!
The second ability for Nussbaum is to be able "to see oneself as a member of a heterogeneous nation
Ability 2: Cosmopolitan Understanding
Nussbaum's arguments can be read as a plea for the revival of the humanities
Connects to broader debate about education's purpose
being able to argue and take part in public debate seems to be an essential ingredient of a healthy democracy
Why rhetoric matters for citizens
We argue that rhetoric as a scholarly discipline and practice offers an important perspective to engage with a contextualized approach
Connects to Mailloux's contextual idea
a clear and unproblematic definition of citizenship
Key source for their critique From this perspective, citizenship is no longer seen as "merely" a status that can be achieved... but it is conceptualized as a "practice"
E.D. Hirsch highlighted the importance of cultural literacy--as "the oxygen of social intercourse"
Traditional view they are arguing AGAINST
aim to move away from a straightforward definition of citizenship in general and civic literacy in particular by developing a rhetorical framework
<<< THESIS! Moving from facts to practice
I come from cultural rhetorics before Cultural Rhetorics. We all do. That's because we come from stories,
Beautiful - locates CR in personal/family history, not just academia
What I found were stories. Stories conjoin communities, cultures, rhetorics, literatures, and literacies
Personal narrative that embodies the method
we hold up cultural rhetorics as a field that encourages communication across differences, locations, spaces, and conversations with respect, reciprocity, and accountability
Summary of goals
How we treat these stories matter as much as how we treat each other.
Ethical imperative - stories have dignity
I view cultural rhetorics as a space where communal practices like stories are valued as homegrown, community-centering, and land-based theories
"Story as theory" - not just data, but a way of knowing
By asking researchers to consider their own cultural positionalities in storying their relationality to the communities they write about, cultural rhetorics renders visible what colonialism tries to hide
CR as decolonial practice
the "hubris of the zero point" meaning a colonial epistemological position that renders itself the voice of a neutral, objective reality
MAJOR CRITIQUE of traditional research
rhetorics are "always-already cultural" and that cultures are "persistently rhetorical,
FOUNDATIONAL MANTRAS - this redefines the whole field.
This is the philosophical basis that connects to Mailloux
so that we may practice relationality and accountability,
Core values of the field
making research and teaching accountable first to communities, rather than the academy
Key ethical stance - accountability to community
This diversity suggests that the work of prioritizing emplaced stories over universalizing theories brings cultural rhetoricians together
CORE PURPOSE OF CR! Stories over theories