43 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2024
    1. evertheless all the major American broadcasting players are still in place. Elsewhere, the new distribution technologies had much less effect on the old broadcasting structures than had neo-liberal political thinking. Unless politics intervened to prevent it, there was little to suggest that the same essential pattern of relative containment that had been seen in America would not happen in these other countries too.

      Broacast and cable are still prevalent, even as streaming overtook them in popularity.

    2. By the mid-1990s, there were thirty major nationally distributed cable channels.

      Cable became more and more mainstream over broadcast.

    3. now require the specific permission of copyright holders, stations, networks, producers, syndicators, etc., on a programme-by-programme basis before they could import signals—an impossibility.

      These limitations limit people who live in places that are hard to access by broadcast signals from experiencing the same programs as those in more populated areas, and lowers accessibility as a whole in favor of protecting the broadcast business.

    4. FCC imposed even stricter regulations on the importation of distant signals, wiping out most of the legal advantages gained by the cable industry

      The regulation of the cable industry just seems like an attempt to keep broadcast on top.

    5. the broadcasters could still charge the advertisers for their viewers whether they were reached through the cable or through the air.

      It is interesting that this decision was made before any cable regulation by the FCC occured.

    6. However, on the contrary, poor reception and limited small town and rural choice were the basis of cable’s steady and consistent growth throughout this period,

      Small towns needed cable to receive signals from far away communication hubs like New York, Philadelphia, and Los Angeles. The cable industry built itself on the needs of Americans who weren't as considered by broadcast.

    7. They had found a way to side-step FCC regulations which prohibited the free-air re-broadcasting of signals; the Commission had nothing to say about sending television pictures down a wire.

      Cable began as its own system entirely. In todays age, the topic of broadcast is almost synonymous with cable, though they are still separate things. They have grown closer together throughout time.

    8. The nemesis of the UK cable industry was GPO and BBC insistence on a form of universal service whereby, for example, the huge variety of possible UHF signals was curtailed in the interests of maximising reception. In Britain, as in most European states, the original thirteen VHF and the current sixty-nine UHF bands were used to ensure that every household received the same signals clearly

      Cable was not accessible by everyone, where as UHF could reach every household. The BBC values public access, so they value the system that can reach more of the public.

    9. As had happened with radio cable, improvements in transmission reduced cable television’s attractiveness. Only municipal regulations forbidding roof antennae kept it alive,

      Cable wasn't the most technologically advanced, but had appeal based on legal regulations. UHF made broadcast more transmissible with better reception, and cable was expensive.

    10. Cable has stood ready to supplant broadcasting from the very beginning of both radio and television; its failure so to is a further vivid example of the operation of the ‘law’ of the suppression of radical potential.

      Cable could have been its own thing entirely, but FCC regulations and favor towards broadcasting diminished its potential.

  2. Mar 2024
    1. They seemed incapable of discerning, even vaguely, what roles each would play in the future process of information dissemination, even though a large number of social commentators of the time were able to define those roles with amazing clarity.

      The two parties should have worked together to improve the quality of news, and their petty arguments just slowed down progress in the press and broadcasting worlds.

    2. 6. The broadcasters were to bear all costs of the new service.

      Newspapers accepted advertisements, so this rule seems hypocritical. The press was looking for reasons to ban newscast, but the reasons they found just weren't fair.

    3. hey were not bound by the agreement and were, therefore, free to respond to listener demand for news and the availability of sponsor money to support the news programs.29

      National news stations were the target of this 'agreement,' especially CBS.

    4. 1. A seven member committee was to be set up to supply limited news for broadcast.

      Only some stories were allowed to be broadcasted?

    5. This report called for government control of radio in the United States, giving as reasons that every other major country in the world had placed broadcasting under governmental control, and also stating that the only way that broadcasters could be prevented from giving false and inaccurate news is by direct government control.

      This goes directly against what was said before, about how radio being under government control made it more susceptible to propaganda. The need for radio to be regulated by the government seems counterintuitive because of this.

    6. also decided that newspapers should refrain from publishing radio programs except as paid advertising

      Newspapers wanted to forbid broadcast from sharing news because they felt it wasn't within public interest, but would not share the radio information to the people who wanted it unless radio paid up. There is a bit of hypocrisy here, and it's obvious that the press was grasping for straws as to why broadcast shouldn't be allowed to share news.

    7. First, radio broadcasting was not free. It was under government control, and, therefore, the potential for propaganda was too great

      This is a fair concern from the press, but I don't necessarily think it is up to the publishers who is spreading news. They don't have a monopoly on information.

    8. while Hearst, gradually buying up a string of radio stations across the country, was meeting the broad- casters' challenge on their own ground by broadcasting news from his papers

      Despite the ban from the Associated Press on selling its news for broadcast, Hearst technically used this information for his own broadcasts, even though they came from his papers.

    9. They stopped reading the papers and went to other sources which would tell them about radio, and the listings returned.5

      Loyalty to radio came to the American people quickly. They had moved on from newspapers when radio could provide them the same information.

    10. their advertising revenues were dropping, while those of radio were on the increase

      Radio's accessibility and ease of consumption made it an easier way to reach massive audiences. It was so appealing because the advertisements could reach directly into the homes of listeners.

    1. Concern for technical control was giving way to concern for standards and taste.

      Hoover's optimism at the fourth radio conference did not match the actual quality of the technology at the time, and the shift in concern matched the issues at the time. This led to the shift from public use to private ownership of signals.

    2. The very speed of development in the United States was given as a reason for governmental action.

      The government was scared of the speed and scale of innovation without regulation, and took action to limit usage of signals and broadcasting material.

    3. from being an ‘attic experiment’ radio became a ‘household utility’.

      Amateur broadcasters and engineers built the foundation of Radio as it grew in the 20th century.

    4. In the first few months of 1922 the numbers increased dramatically—26 in January, 14 in February, 27 in March, and 88 in April. By the first of May there were 219 registered radio stations in the United States, broadcasting news bulletins, weather and market reports, concerts, lectures, and commentaries on outside events. In the month of May itself 99 new stations were started.8

      The exponential increase in radio usage in 1922 should have led to more public usage of radio, but the over crowding of frequencies would eventually lead it to be limited to business and government usage.

    5. Broadcasting was thus deliberately recognized as being more important than point-to-point communication.

      Broadcast can communicate with the masses much faster and more effectively than point to point, spreading important information as efficiently as possible.

    6. The new organization was a product of American nationalism, and among its articles of incorporation was the rule that ‘no person shall be eligible for election as a director or officer of the Corporation who is not at the time of such election a citizen of the United States’.

      The effects of the war and wars in general placed mistrust in people from other countries, and a feeling of American superiority. This mistrust has continued in some form or another for many Americans, particularly older, conservative, Americans, throughout the years.

    7. ‘Public Service Broadcasting Company or National Broadcasting Company’, which would include on its Board of Directors not only business men but ‘a few men from outside, prominent in national or civic affairs’

      Sarnoff's idea to include the public in the operation of broadcast would lead to PBS and similar stations that ensure the radio is not strictly a business enterprise.

    8. ‘did not arrive until the situation in America forced the hands of the authorities here to allow it.

      The American Broadcasting Boom led Britain to follow suit, America utilized the technology to cement itself as the communication leader of the world, and our current status as the largest media market.

  3. Feb 2024
    1. Binns, like Marconi ten years earlier, was the perfect media hero.

      There was seemingly a need to have 'media heroes' in the ever changing field of global telecommunications. Having these heroes probably helped to increase acceptance of the new technology among those who may be weary of it.

    2. Finding suit­ able cylindrical objects was not always easy; some boys used broken baseball bats or old curtain rods for lack of anything else.

      The interest in technology and communication promoted resourcefulness among the amateurs.

    3. Hundreds of schoolboys in every part of the country have taken to this most popular scientific fad, and, by copying the instruments used at the regular stations and constructing apparatus out of all kinds of electrical junk, have built wireless equipments that in some cases approach the naval stations in efficiency."14

      Amateurs are often just as skilled if not more skilled than trained engineers and operators. This goes for many realms of technology.

    4. He became an explorer

      The rise of wireless changed the idea of what an explorer could be. Wireless made experiencing the world infinitely more accessible to people who couldn't experience it in person. At first, it was still limited to those wealthy or connected enough to get the parts or education to understand the machinery. But the growing fascination young boys had on the technology meant that building it independently became more common, and amateurs were able to connect worldwide.

    5. men had to have forceful, commanding personalities, as well

      This idea has stayed prevalent well into the 21st century. It wasn't invented here, but the emphasis on being commanding and forceful in this era of increasing global communication has definitely bled into our modern day.

    6. rise of the boy inventor-hero as a popular culture archetype.

      This archetype is so prevalent in modern literature and media that it seems so strange that it hasn't always been a trope. The amateur hero/kid genius trope is majorly filled with white male characters, but grows increasingly more diverse through the years. This archetype redefined what it meant to be a white middle class man, but has in turn redefined what it means to be any type of person.

    7. His equipment was extremely powerful, and he had the ability to "destroy" the messages of others at will.

      It is interesting that some of the earliest instances of wireless communication already were able to interfere with other people's messages. The amateur operators were quite smart to be able to figure things like that out mostly on their own.

    1. After months of rigorous training and drilling, the First Unit finally sailed on March 2, 1918. Led by Grace Banker, a 25-year-old graduate of Barnard College, they were America’s first female soldiers.

      unsung heroes of the world

    2. some operators took a pay cut to serve the Army

      the principle of serving in the war was worth more than the limited pay

    3. Previously, only suffragists and temperance activists paraded en masse. Now yeomanettes matched their strides to men, establishing new precedents for acceptable public behavior.

      symbolic strides enroute to gender equality

    4. The Secretary insisted on equal compensation, too. Female yeomen earned $28.75 per month, the same as men. The Navy provided no housing for females, so it paid women an additional $1.25 per day for billeting. Female recruits received free uniforms and medical care, and were eligible for war risk insurance. Most worked ten hours per day, six days a week, including night shifts. They wore the same insignia as men.

      not many jobs at this time had this kind of gender equality, if any. Secretary Daniels was ahead of his time, even if it was in efforts of war

    5. United States became the world’s first modern nation to enlist females

      interesting that the US was ahead on this endeavor, but fell behind on voting rights

    6. They were soldiers, not angels.

      the refusal to acknowledge Hello Girls as soldiers for years despite the importance of their position. the war could've gone a different dirrection if not for them, and they were ignored.

    7. We know less about what changed men’s minds.

      was the involvement of women in WWI a factor at all in the change of mens opinions? Why did it take so much after the war to make the changes when changes to voting rights historically always came with war?

    8. soldiering has established qualifications for full citizenship

      war comes first over politics throughout history