very time I restarted the “game” to exploreanother fork in the path, I got a little lesssqueamish about drug abuse, about self-harm,about murder.
Why less squeamish? Does the act of making plot choice undermine our suspension of disbelief?
very time I restarted the “game” to exploreanother fork in the path, I got a little lesssqueamish about drug abuse, about self-harm,about murder.
Why less squeamish? Does the act of making plot choice undermine our suspension of disbelief?
Giving and taking of orders modifies action and results, but does not of itself effect a sharing of purposes, a communication of interests.
A rigid hierarchical structure does not lead to sharing of purpose. Do schools today still operate this way? Consider the Persepolis controversy in Commack.
Consensus demands communication.
Like this seminar -- we share a common purpose and a means of and interest in communication.
Society exists through a process of transmission
What gets transmitted? Or what should get transmitted? This is a challenge for all educators, but especially English teachers?