he results of this simple exercise suggest that conservationdecisions could indeed be bolstered by including fossildata
This is their main argument and point to a notable gap in conservation's use of the fossil record and its use as extra data/analogue
considered global climatestate and change in climate state since previous observationin order to evaluate the influence of climate or climatechange trajectory on extinction risk
Probably one of the more important aspects considering how influential climate state is on microfauna
only those species with firstoccurrences no earlier than 63 Ma
A notable exclusion as I thought using more spatially relative species in the past would create a better analogue
humanimpacts may substantially alter present and future extinctionrisk dynamics
I'm glad to see a mention of how humans pose a significant chance of alteration to the model because as mentioned its impossible to predict how we move forward in technology and its subsequent impact on the environment.
9th of July, 1640.
Small Note: 5 days after the day that would be recognized in the future as the separation and "freedom" from Britain is the day America would see its first slave in writing.
negro named John Punch shall serve his said master or hisassigns for the time of his natural Life here or elsewhere
Punishment is far more severe than either of his fellow escapee's even when the crime committed is the same
responsible for the transportation of sediment from the main land mass into deeper ocean
Heavy salt water carves into relatively loose sediment