I need to understand if this is really the case. Lot's of people speak to diversity, inclusivity, and equity and and say the mantras like 'equality of outcome' and show that picture of the three kids of different height trying to look over the fence and 'believe' all the rhetoric... but they act as if they value competence. I think there might be an element of selfishness in this too. Especially from young academics. Imagine if you were 21 or 22 years old and you got accepted into social justice phd and you spend 4 years writing a garbage thesis on critical race theory and pick-your-oppressed-group. Now, you've graduated and your just shy of 30 and you get a job teaching at university because you are lucky, wrote a 'decent' thesis, and satisfied the university's equity quota. You landed a job that is very hard to achieve, and you got it by equity discourse. But by now, since your almost 30 you've gotten a little smarter. You start to see the flaws of your equity discourse theory, especially if you have been given the chance to travel, or are finally living alone, far enough away from your parents. But what do you do? You keep publishing equity discourse garbage because you got a job at a university dammit and your going to keep it.... Or maybe that doesn't happen at all. lol. I wonder if by 'true hatred' Peterson means an unconscious hatred? Or do they know it deep down inside? ... It's fascinating. I wish I knew more.