11 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. An appetite for climate finance?

      During this poll/survey there was no evidence of anecdote fallacy. The poll/survey remained objective and did not jump to any conclusions.

    2. What do t

      The limitiations for this poll/survey are that it may be difficult to be objective about climate change.

    3. 86 per cent

      A concept from class that I learned about was statistics.

    4. Four in five people

      A concept from class that I learned about was random selection.

  2. Oct 2024
    1. I attack the enemy within. A murderous array of disease has to be fought against, and the battle is not a battle for the sluggard.”

      Example of a medical metaphor. The entailments of this metaphor are graphic. The words written depict a vivid image.

    2. It’s going to be our 9/11 moment.”

      Example of a a war metaphor. The entailments of this metaphor are visual. It brings up the vivid pictures in your head about 9/11.

    3. Surgeon General Jerome Adams

      Expert example.

    1. She added that federal regulation that would require companies to abide by specific protocols is also needed to keep up the rapid pace of AI advancement.

      This can be taken as a fact because there is evidence that will be able to back it up.

    2. But not all users dislike the feature.

      This is a conclusion. The user's who are in more favor of the AI tool do not pay the fee to remove it as stated above.

    1. But the contest falls into a legal gray area and could potentially violate election law, according to interviews with several election law experts. While paying someone to vote or to register to vote is explicitly illegal under federal law, the lottery is contingent on signing a petition rather than merely registering to vote.

      This is crucial to note because although the competition seems cut and dry there is a loophole for legal action.

    2. The DOJ spokesperson declined to comment further and would not say whether the department had opened an investigation.

      This is important because if the DOJ decided to speak it could of backfired and caused chaos.