131 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2020
  2. Feb 2020
    1. outsiders,

      But isn't that the tension? He is simultaneously an outsider (by virtue of being gay and thus a minority) and not an outsider (by virtue of his education and relationship to esteemed and powerful institutions and people).

    2. Female candidates have had experiences similar to his; candidates of color, too. These pioneers

      Gestures towards other "pioneers" who have had to blaze trails and have come under enormous scrutiny. Discuss why he gestures outward and specifically names Obama and Hillary.

    3. his candidacy is a metaphor for our lives:

      Moves from "you" to "I" to "us." Here he says that Buttigieg's candidacy, which has played out on the national stage, is a metaphor for all gay people.

    4. As a gay man and an American, I felt a surge of pride.

      Positioning himself as writer in relationship to the subject. What does this do for us as readers? Why does he self identity here?

  3. Jan 2020
    1. Dog ignored the rules and then read his fortune: “You will pass a big upcoming test.” He laughed hard, before coughing. His face got redder and redder, but then he smiled. “I better,” he said.

      Talk about ending.

    2. He said it didn’t matter to him who is in the White House. “

      He seems apolitical but generally patriotic and loyal to whomever is in power. Trump ran as a "law and order" candidate, however, so I imagine that drew Dog.

    3. In September, three months after the death of his wife, Dog the Bounty Hunter was angling under the Colorado sun at a trout pond in the backwoods of the Rocky Mountains.

      Places him in a setting.

    1. a big personality — quite aggressive, active and vocal in his mating habits and so I think he has gotten most of the attention.”

      He got attention and a name, apparently, because he is more aggressive. I'm not sure this is the kind of publicity we want to give aggressive maters!

    2. Why did he attract so many mates and garner such international attention, especially if another male was more productive?

      Anticipates our question.

    1. Mr. Simmons, who is 33 and known as Patches,

      Known-New Contract here: we were given a name and then the writer picks it up again in the next sentence and provides more information.

    2. All David Simmons needs is a chuckle, a smile even, to set the hook and reel people back to his booth with more stinging insults — the weight of a man’s date, or the cheap finish of a woman’s fake gold hoop earrings.

      Opens without easing us in--just throws us into the situation. Makes us ask who David Simmons is.

  4. Oct 2019
    1. uts t

      So we could definitely talk about the purpose of this text, the stance of the writer, the tone, word choice, and intended audience. Then there is the language itself. And the claims. Lots to analyze!

    2. Indeed, Jim Crow was born out of a fear of “Negro domination” in which white Southerners were deadly afraid that they could be forced to live under black rule in the wake of the Civil War.

      Hyperlinks or references to evidence would be helpful here for those whites who are resistant to the idea. The 1619 Project actually has audio footage of white people saying that they don't want to be replaced. See interview on NPR from 10/14.

    3. President Trump is the new doctrine, and Republicans bought it. There is no amount of cruelty or crudeness he can display that Republicans won’t cheer and defend. His corruption has become theirs.

      Equates corruption of Trump with corruption of the party.

    4. That which was once forbidden is now embraced. That which they once condemned they cheer.

      Allusion to biblical passages, repetition, and unusual syntax all cause us to slow down and read carefully.

  5. Feb 2019
    1. So how do we get hyper-conscientious girls (and boys, as there certainly are some with the same style) to build both confidence and competence at school?

      Inquiry question?

    2. From elementary school through college, girls are more disciplined about their schoolwork than boys; they study harder and get better grades. Girls consistently outperform boys academically. And yet, men nonetheless hold a staggering 95 percent of the top positions in the largest public companies.

      Quick overview of situation

    1. In principle, I’m for every story being told, irrespective of its implications, because erring the other way threatens to lead to the sort of censorship-for-the-greater-good you see in totalitarian states. And I have some dumb idealistic conviction that every awkward, heterodox, contradictory truth adds up to create a larger, truer picture of the world.Get our newsletter and never miss an Op-DocWatch Oscar-nominated short documentaries from around the world made for you.Sign Up* Captcha is incomplete. Please try again.Thank you for subscribingYou can also view our other newsletters or visit your account to opt out or manage email preferences.An error has occurred. Please try again later.You are already subscribed to this email.View all New York Times newsletters.

      We've made some big leaps here. There is a difference between censoring people's stories because they don't fit our narratives and giving anomalous stories a platform whereby others will then discount and discredit minority voices. How did we move to censorship?

    2. Gettysburg Address or “I Have a Dream” speech — but is there one we could all agree on anymore?

      Romanticize much? People did not immediately celebrate these speeches. White people, our own elected officials, tried and succeeded in killing MLK Jr. No speech can totally unify.

    3. I suspect one reason American life spans are plummeting is a deficiency of meaning: We’ve lost the thread of our story. W

      Wait ,what? This feels like a big leap here.

    4. I suppose the worry underlying all these calculated evasions is that a story of, say, a woman fabricating a rape, or someone using a gun to stop a home invasion, or a Muslim being the perpetrator of a mass killing, will be used to undermine larger, more important truths, like the Republican senator Jim Inhofe tossing a snowball on the Senate floor to “disprove” climate change.

      Exactly. A legitimate concern.

    5. and assured me that I had been a good influence. We’re now on friendly terms again. This is a very different story, one that awkwardly complicates the previous narrative.

      Wow. What is her reversal was because he had written about their relationship and published it? And what if she was feeling uncomfortable or compromised and didn't want to be on bad terms? Lots of people decide not to press charges against abusers and assaulters--not because the people were "innocent" but because it is all so complicated and humiliating and people who exploit their power often remain in power.

    6. shouldn’t every story get to be told?

      But why? Haven't we heard a lot of the same stories over and over? And haven't many of those stories dehumanized people's lives and experiences? Can we focus on equity and not just equality?

    7. are these the stories the public most needs to hear?

      The friend asked this question because we know that we construct our reality based on stories, and if we tell stories about trans people second-guessing or regretting their transitions, then people who are already skeptical of the validity of trans people's experiences can point to these exceptions and use them to call all trans people's experiences into question.

    8. It’s not a question of truth but utility: whether particular stories appropriately conform to or inconveniently contradict certain fashionable, or even ideologically mandatory, narratives.

      Stories don't aim to tell the truth, which is something large and dialogic, but aim to advance a particular way of thinking.

  6. Jan 2019
    1. In 17th-century England, work was lauded as a cure for vice, Mr. Spencer said, but the unrewarding truth just drove workers to drink more

      Idle hands are the devil's workshop.

    2. An entire generation was raised to expect that good grades and extracurricular overachievement would reward them with fulfilling jobs that feed their passions. Inste

      So much to unpack in this article!

    3. Aidan Harper, who created a European workweek-shrinkage campaign called 4 Day Week, argues that this is dehumanizing and toxic. “It creates the assumption that the only value we have as human beings is our productivity capability — our ability to work, rather than our humanity,” he told me.

      Marxist critique.

    4. In San Francisco, where I live, I’ve noticed that the concept of productivity has taken on an almost spiritual dimension. Techies here have internalized the idea — rooted in the Protestant work ethic — that work is not something you do to get what you want; the work itself is all.

      Fascinating.

    5. “The vast majority of people beating the drums of hustle-mania are not the people doing the actual work. They’re the managers, financiers and owners,” said David Heinemeier Hansson, the co-founder of Basecamp, a software company.

      And herein lies an important distinction. Bezos is not wearing something that tells him how fast he is filling orders, how long his bathroom breaks are, etc. People making an hourly wage are filling the boxes and reporting to the millionaires.

    6. Gary Vaynerchuk,

      Looked him up. He grew his family's wine business but has since become an online personality and does a lot of digital marketing. He live vlogged for 7 hours recently. How horrifying.

    7. The entire first paragraph is one sentence. Interestingly, she uses the dash, an informal punctuation mark, and then uses semicolons within the aside itself, followed by a colon and a funny pronouncement that no sane person ever says: Thank God It's Monday.

    1. nd that’s on them

      Why not "That's on you." Why isn't he addressing readers? Is this article written for other journalists and members of the media?

    2. the tally of Trump’s sins had little bearing on that.

      White evangelicals were interested in what he promised to do for them and not in his own faith or morality.

    3. We interpreted fairness as a similarly apportioned mix of complimentary and derogatory stories about each contender, no matter how different one contender’s qualifications, accomplishments and liabilities were from another’s. If we were going to pile on Trump, we had to pile on Clinton — or, rather, keep piling on her.

      Equity vs. equality

    4. In retrospect, that’s madness.

      Regardless of whether a person likes H. Clinton or her policies, she has experience, intelligence, and had a platform. Trump ran on personality, name calling, slogans, and theatrics.

    5. unlike the coverage of Clinton, which remained mostly negative.

      Including by the NYT opinion writers such as Maureen Dowd. And they gave a platform to critics of Clinton.

    6. the number of stories about Trump in the country’s most influential newspapers and on its principal newscasts significantly exceeded what his support in polls at the time justified.

      Interesting reveal here. Is Bruni admitting that media bear some responsibility/praise in getting him elected?

    7. they’re starved of information about the fraudulence of his supposed populism and the toll of his incompetence.

      Packs a lot in this sentence: we, the spectators of this ghastly show, are starved of information about how fraudulent his populism is and how incompetent he is.

    8. “When you cover this as spectacle,” Rather said, “what’s lost is context, perspective and depth. And when you cover this as spectacle, he is the star.” Spectacle is his métier. He’s indisputably spectacular. And even if it’s a ghastly spectacle and presented that way, it still lets him control the narrative.

      This! "When you cover this as spectacle, what's lost is context, perspective and depth."

    9. We had to weigh a request in line with precedent against a president out of line when it comes to truth. We had to wrestle with — and figure out when and how to resist — his talent for using us as vessels for propaganda.

      Again, great sentences, and Bruni is giving us context. How do you say "no" to the president? But how do you allow yourself to be a medium for a message that is consistently inaccurate and manipulative as well as aggressive and insulting?

    10. Will we sprint to Beto O’Rourke, Cory Booker or Mike Bloomberg for a reaction to what Trump just called one of them and then rush back to him for his response to that response?

      If history is a reliable indicator, chances are good that NYT and everyone else will.

  7. Feb 2018
    1. Police officers training at a school in Methuen, Mass., in 2014. Real-life drills have logistical and financial drawbacks compared with computer simulations.

      Can you imagine? On non-attendance days for students, faculty and staff receive stale bagels and coffee and then receive a training in which some staff member pretends to be a shooter and women and men in squad gear arrive with guns?

  8. Oct 2017
    1. In “Watershed,

      Writer is organizing essay around stories rather than rhetorical techniques. This is not jarring because the previous paragraph was also about the short story "Watershed."

    2. Groff’s use of the second person point of view turns the reader into the character of the dead husband,

      Here we have a rhetorical analysis: the writer provides a summary of the story but does so in order to advance an analysis--namely, that Celie, the storyteller in the story, reveals how her husband died but is actually addressing the dead husband through the use of the second-person "you." We don't just have a summary; we have an analysis.

  9. Jan 2017
    1. Washington liberals like nothing more than spending other people’s money.

      Ha ha ha. This is hilarious.What a partisan budget plan, intended to make Democrats and citizens mad.

    2. he First Amendment Defense Act, an important RSC Initiative introduced by Representative Raul Labrador, seeks to protect Americans’ right to live according to their beliefs -without discrimination, persecution, or retaliation from the federal government.

      So long as those beliefs correspond with conservative Christian beliefs.Gays, lesbians, and bisexuals do not have protection from persecution or retaliation.

    3. by prohibiting federal funds from going to entities, including Planned Parenthood, that provide abortions

      Federal funds cannot go to organizations that provide abortions; this is far different than ensuring funds don't go towards abortions.

    4. This budget would prevent any funding from being directed to admit refugees from Syria and Iraq until the stringent requirements to ensure American’s safety are in place

      But they already are in place. It's a thorough process with an 18-24-month wait.

    5. he U.S. Constitution is clear about the role and limits of government. The President has stretched, bent, and broken these limits. Despite the Obama Administration’s best efforts to undermine our nation’s founding principles, however, the strength of our system of checks and balances has been upheld by the courts and continuing congressional oversight.

      Partisan editorializing.

    1. But our desire to acknowledge that is barely stronger than our determination to cut them down to size.

      This sentence requires some careful reading. Our desire to acknowledge that our parents are larger than life is only a little stronger than our desire to cut them down to size--meaning, there are competing desires within us. On the one hand, we want to lash out and make them see that they are just ordinary, that they suffer the same failures and successes as us. On the other hand, we want to see them as the six-year-old Fisher saw her mother, with adoration and dependence. The bonds between parents and children are complicated.

    2. It’s also hard not to reflect on the relationship between these two movie-industry legends as a case study — upsized for Hollywood, sensationalized accordingly and on display to the entire world — of the currents between almost every parent and child: the pride and the shame; the protectiveness and the destructiveness; the gratitude and the resentment.

      Here's the larger claim: although celebrities, Fisher and Reynolds endured the same challenges that beset most child-parent relationships. The mother was protective but destructive, the child thankful but resentful.

    3. it’s impossible not to regard the head-turning coincidence as a heartbreaking confirmation of the singular embrace in which Fisher and Reynolds held, and sometimes smothered, each other.

      Claim: Reynolds's death is confirmation their bond.

    4. about her memories of “Star Wars,” about her electric shock treatments, about Diet Coke, about everything

      Items are dissimilar because she was talking about so much and so freely.

  10. Mar 2016
    1. Yellowstone National Park’s best-known wolf, beloved by many tourists and valued by scientists who tracked its movements, was shot and killed on Thursday outside the park’s boundaries, Wyoming wildlife officials reported.

      Information

    2. Yellowstone National Park’s best-known wolf, beloved by many tourists and valued by scientists who tracked its movements, was shot and killed on Thursday outside the park’s boundaries, Wyoming wildlife officials reported.

      Information: Wolf 832F was shot and killed (thus not killed by natural causes)

    3. The wolf, known as 832F to researchers, was the alpha female of the park’s highly visible Lamar Canyon pack and had become so well known that some wildlife watchers referred to her as a “rock star.” The animal had been a tourist favorite for most of the past six years.

      Context/Backstory: Wolf was tourist favorite

    4. This year’s hunting season in the northern Rockies has been especially controversial because of the high numbers of popular wolves and wolves fitted with research collars that have been killed just outside Yellowstone in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming.

      Analysis: this season has been especially controversial because hunters are killing wolves being followed by researchers.

    5. Many ranchers and hunters say the wolf hunts are a reasonable way to reduce attacks on livestock and protect big game populations.

      Stakeholders: ranchers and hunters

    6. The deaths have dismayed scientists who track wolves to study their habits, population spread and threats to their survival.

      Stakeholder: scientists who are studying wolves

  11. Jan 2016
    1. marking important quo-tations or passages with an asterisk while readingwould help with the problem of interrupting theflow. These students would then go back into thetext to reflect on the importance of the passage andrecord their thoughts in the margins of the textand/or write about these important passages in theirjournals or use some other writing-to-learn strategy

      Solution to the disruption that annotating can cause.

    2. using annotation as a reading strategy

      Annotation as a reading and writing strategy: students read more purposefully and are therefore better equipped to write more purposefully--even if only writing a reader response.

    3. highlight key ideas and write marginalnotes that helped me make connections, pose ques-tions, and interpret ideas.

      Purpose of annotations: make connections, pose questions, and interpret ideas.