33 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2015
  2. learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com
    1. Never conversed with a native of Russia

      I find the multi nationality component interesting, it's kind of darkly humorous. It's also kind of scary how it causes this inability for communication/different understandings of events...

    2. Residing in Paris during the spring and part of the summer of 18__, I therebecame acquainted with a Monsieur C. Auguste Dupin

      the story is set in Paris so maybe it's not that the detective stories have to be set in the US...maybe Poe's experiences with American cities though informed this form though (He lived in Baltimore in NYC if I'm not mistaken)?

    3. Considered the first detective story, this work made Poe the only American toever invent a form of literature

      I find it interesting that detective stories originated in the US/in American cities; we haven't really looked at European cities but Iwonder if there's a difference in the ambiance/history that caused these narratives to emerge

    1. As the night deepened, so deepened to me the interest of the scene; for not only did thegeneral character of the crowd materially alter (its gentler features retiring in the gradual withdrawalof the more orderly portion of the people, and its harsher ones coming out into bolder relief, as thelate hour brought forth every species of infamy from its den,) but the rays of the gas-lamps, feebleat first in their struggle with the dying day, had now at length gained ascendancy, and threw overevery thing a fitful and garish lustre. All was dark yet splendid—as that ebony to which has beenlikened the style of Tertullian.

      I find the night in the city description really interesting. I think it's one of the more romanticized but also feared aspects of urban life. His diction and tone contradicts itself through out the passage, maybe reflecting that tension?

    2. There were many individuals of dashing appearance, whom I easily understood as belongingto the race of swell pick-pockets with which all great cities are infested. I watched these gentry withmuch inquisitiveness, and found it difficult to imagine how they should ever be mistaken forgentlemen by gentlemen themselves. Their voluminousness of wristband, with an air of excessivefrankness, should betray them at once. The gamblers, of whom I descried not a few, were still more easily recognisable.

      Like the confidence men depicted in the 19th century texts we looked at (pickpockets and gamblers); Poe doesn't seem to look at it super negatively though, more just as a reality of urban life that you have to accept

    3. London. For some months I had been ill in health, but was nowconvalescent, and, with returning strength, found myself in one of those happy moods which are soprecisely the converse of ennui—moods of the keenest appetency, when the film from the mentalvision departs

      kind of like Didion; she was sick when she first arrived in the city but her health improved as she grew attached to it

    1. Too much is expected of city parks. Far from transforming any essential quality in their surroundings, far from automatically up-lifting their neighborhoods, neighborhood parks themselves are directly and drastically affected by the way the neighborhood acts upon them.

      haha thats what i said :) Maybe this isn't because of a fault of the neighborhood or the park but the positioning of it within the community/the neighborhood grew out in a way that the park ended up being unable to accommodate?

    2. arks are not automatically anything, and least of all are these volatile elements stabilizers of values or of their neighborhoods and districts. Philadelphia affords almost a controlled experiment on this point. When Penn laid out the city, he placed at its center the square now occupied by City Hall, and at equal distances from this center he placed four residential squares. What has become of these four, all the same age, the same size, the same original use, and as nearly the same in presumed advantages of location as they could be made? Their fates are wildly different.

      Ironically, the parks are more informed by their surroundings than they help to inform the area around the; contradicts common urban planning practice

    3. Mr. Moses conceded that some new housing might be 'ugly, regi-mented, institutional, identical, conformed, faceless.' But he suggested that such housing could be surrounded with parks

      This reference demonstrates how parks can be used as justification for building aesthetically unappealing cheap housing by urban planners who adopt a top down approach. They believe that any park they create will please that community while Jacobs take a more nuanced approach

    1. Law? What do I care for law? Hain't I got the power?" and J. P. Morgan's "I owe the public nothing."

      Points to the not so subtle influence of wealthy interests in urban politics; if this was the mindset of so many of the influential shapers of the urban landscape in its early years, some residue of this attitude must continue to exist

    2. Before the eyes of America a bright new world of mass leisure was unfolding.

      It was only a new world of mass leisure from the perspective of those high up enough in the mass production chain; lower level laborers were not afforded the same luxuries ---> limits of the scope of the argument?

    3. he population of New York City had increased from 4,766,883 to 5,62o,o48 between 1910 and 1920, and now, in the Twenties, the rate of increase was accelerating, and most of it was occurring outside Manhattan.

      The rapid population increase in NYC caused parks to be put on hold in order to address the need to create residential buildings; he sort of seems to throw this out resentfully...maybe this reinforces the idea of parks as a bourgeois?

  3. Oct 2015
  4. apartmentstories2016.files.wordpress.com apartmentstories2016.files.wordpress.com
    1. Language withdraws from man its simple and high speech. But its primal call does not thereby become incapable of speech; it merely falls silent. . Man, thougJi., fails to heed this silence. But if we listen to what language says in the word bauen we hear three things: 1. Building is really dwelling. 2. Dwelling is the manner in which mortals are on the earth. 3. Building as dwelling unfolds into the building that cultivates growing things and the building that erects buildings.

      I find this analysis of language really interesting. It shows how the way we think about dwelling in a place has changed as culture and the way we experience our residences has evolved. Maybe the move to cities has made us feel more alienated from our residences. We don't feel ownership and stability the same way?

    2. Man acts as though he were the shaper and master of language, while in fact language remains the master of man. Perhaps it is before all else man's sub-version of this relation of dominance that drives his essential being into alienation.

      this is the one of the reasons for our confusion/lack of comprehension of our urban condition. we are alienated because we try to conflate words like dwelling and inhabiting (?)

    3. residential buildings do indeed provide lodgings; today's houses may even be well planned, easy to keep, attractively cheap, open to air, light, and sun, but-do the houses in themselves hold any guarantee that dwelling occurs in them?

      this distinction reminds me of the space and place distinction, dwelling being place and the buildings being space

    1. es are fragmentary and inward-turning histories, pa.sts that others are not allowed to read, accumulated times that can be unf led but lik7 stones eld in reserve, remaining in an enigmatic state, symbolizations encysted in the pain or pleasure of the body. "I feel good here":50 the well-being under-expressed in the language it appears in like a fleeting glimmer is a spatial practice.

      place vs. space; place is personal, its a "past others are not allowed to read". Its also an impulse/an instinctual feeling of safety/wellbeing "I feel good here"

    2. it is a spatial acting-out of th place (just as the speech act is an acoustic acting-out of language); a~ . . It 1mphes relations am on d1tterentiated ositions that is among~ matic "contracts" in the form of movements (just as verbal enunciatiogn is an "allocution," "posits another opposite" the speaker and puts con. tracts between interlocutors into action). 14 It thus seems possible to give a preliminary definition of walking as a space of enunciation

      walking as speech; a way of customizing the city, making it yours (connection to mapping? a personal mapping? outside institutions if you're just wandering

    3. Medieval or Renatssance pa~nters re~e city as seen in a persp~tive that no ey: had yet enJ_oyed.2 ~already made the medieval s ec-tator _mto a celesttal eye. lt created gods

      The city as a celestial/other-wordly place. The phrase "created gods" really caught me. I think the city does inspire a fictional lore (ie. Gotham for NYC)

  5. Sep 2015
    1. an olfactory worldwould be one where odors are spatially disposed, not simplyone in which they appear in random succession or as inchoatemixtures. Can senses other than sight and touch provide aspatially organized world? It is possible to argue that taste,odor, and even hearing cannot in themselves give us a sense ofspace.

      sense of a smell as a method of spacial organization and awareness. distinctive smells corresponding to specific environments

    2. Experience thus implies theability to learn from what one has undergone.3 To experience isto learn; it means acting on the given and creating out of thegiven. The given cannot be known in itself. What can be knownis a reality that is a construct of experience, a creation of feelingand thought.

      apply to Didion, Devore, Brooke. Thinking of life in the city as a learning experience. Its not a waste of time if you've learned from it

    3. 9Experiential PerspectiveExperience is directed to the external world. Seeing andthinking clearly reach out beyond the self. Feeling is moreambiguous. As Paul Ricoeur put it, "Feeling is ...withoutdoubt intentional: it is a feeling of 'something'—the lovable,the hateful, [for instance]. But it is a very strange intentionalitywhich on the one hand designates qualities felt on things, onpersons, on the world, and on the other hand manifests andreveals the way in which the self is inwardly affected." In feel-ing "an intention and an affection coincide in the same experi-ence.

      if feelings are directed on the external world then they would be reflected onto the city --> the city as a representation of the values/attitudes/emotions of its inhabitants

    4. How the human person, who isanimal, fantasist, and computer combined, experiences andunderstands the world is the central theme of this book

      the complexity, multi-layered nature of people is reflected in cities. part of what contributes to the chaotic vibe

  6. gimmeshelter2015.files.wordpress.com gimmeshelter2015.files.wordpress.com
    1. There arc:: other basic properties in a beautiful envi-ronment: meaning or expressiveness, sensuous delight, rhythm, stimulus, choice. Our concentration on imageability does not deny their importance. Our purpose is simply to consider the need for identity and structure in our perceptual world, and to illustrate the special relevance of this quality to the particular case of the complex, shifting urban environme

      imageable goes beyond beautiful. implies a symmetry, common aesthetic that creates a sense of order in an other wise hectic environment

    2. Although clarity or legibility is by no means the only impor-tant property of a beautiful city, it is of special importance when considering environments at the urban scale of size, time, and complexity. To understand this, we must consider not just the city as a thing in itself, but the city being perceived by its inhab-itants.

      Clarity and legibility are tools to understand and discuss the environment of a city, not to strictly categorize it into a box (?) Tools to help us make sense of our surroundings

    3. here is no final result, only a continuous succession of phases. No wonder, then, that the art of shaping cities for sensuous enjoyment is an art quite separate from architecture or music or literature

      Ties in with Brooke's comment about construction. The city is always developing/transforming etc. It's not static by any means

    4. Every citizen has had long associations with some part of his city, and his image is soaked in memories and meanings

      I find "his city" interesting. There is a type of ownership people feel for the city they grew up in or have lived in for a long time. It means something different and special for each person that experiences it

    1. he "M-factor" that has shaped the American national character: movement, migration, mobility. He was, first of all, a wanderer, independent of any fixed social nexus of community, family, or permanent friends. His geographical mobility determined a second distinguishing characteristic: his up-ward social mobility.

      conservative writers are also conserned about their social status. confidence men symbolize the "nouveau riche", people that are working their way up/"self made men". Threatening to people that are in their social position by birth (or profession in the case of the clergy)

    2. vertical institutions could not contain the new complexity of national social life, new social organizations emerged that were formed along the horizontal lines of e~onomic class and social status-organizations such as medical societies, mechanics' institu-tions, benevolent fraternities, charitable assoqations, and political clubs. Membership in these new organizations ~snot hereditary or compulsory, but voluntary; the pattern of authority was not one of .,. mastery and deference, but one of equality.

      threatened by the social ramifications of economic changes. the patriarchal/religious system is becoming rapidly antiquated. conservative writers are worried that their influence is slipping and they're trying to scare young people into letting them preserve their power

    3. Since the Revolution, Americans had • stressed that what made a republic great was the character and spirit of its people. The ultimate threat of the confidence man was thus his power to subvert the American republican experiment.

      Conservative advice writers were concerned with the political ramifications of urban living (the corruption of traditional values and moral decay). It's interesting to think of urbanization in not only an economic but political context considering how young and relatively untested the country was

    4. hlstrom,

      annotate

    1. New York was no mere city. It was instead an infinitely romantic notion, the mysteri-ous nexus of all love and money and power, the shining and perishable dream itself. To think of "living" there was to reduce the miraculous to the mundane; one does not "live" at Xanadu.

      the illusion/the dream/the ideal vs. the reality of the city. you come to NYC to live the dream but in doing so you kill the fantasy. the narrator is staying out of the hope that NYC does live up to her imagination

    2. Nothing was irrevocable; everything was within reach. Just around every comer lay something curious and interest-ing, something I had never before seen or done or known

      she feels optimistic and invisible without any concrete reason to (as she says she's poor, not working a high paying job). demonstrates how the attractiveness of the city can manipulate young people into staying against better judgment (see coming bachelor girl)

    3. could taste th~ peach and feel the soft air blowing from a subway grating on my legs and I could smell lilac and garbage and expensive perfume and I knew that it would cost something sooner or later-because I did not belong there,

      interesting contradictions, peach/lilac/perfume vs. garbage/grating subway. maybe highlighting the tension between her love of New York and the sense that she doesn't belong there