It is not enough just to disconnect
Most people don't want to disconnect
It is not enough just to disconnect
Most people don't want to disconnect
overlap between the domains of social interaction and profit.
makes me think about how ads show up on facebook, based off what i shop for online
it is not connection itself that is the problem. It is what comes with connection, in particular its infrastructure of surveillance
I agree. Being connected is not the issue, rather having everything surveyed is the major issue. There's no real privacy anymore.
Less good perhaps, every site would, in principle, be monitorable from every other and would be so monitored by institutions with the appropriate infrastructure.
reminds me of big brother
The devaluation of social media and audience engagement roles has a serious impact — on the employees who do the jobs, on team and company dynamics, and on the success and potential of the company. Devaluation means employees in this role don’t get the resources they need — particularly company money — to experiment and test new technologies that could actually bring the company’s social and digital presence to new heights. It means that the employees’ authority as experts in how the digital world interacts isn’t taken seriously by other parts of the company, and is often ignored… so that decisions are made without the interests of marketing and amplifying content as best as it possibly could be. That, in turn, affects the company’s brand recognition, the company’s social and digital foothold and credibility online, and the company’s success.
social media roles help the business get more publicity and grow, yet people fail to give it its credit.
Social media jobs may not involve coding. They may not involve debugging. They may not involve writing a novel or reporting. But they’re still analytical as fuck, with a measure of art in there.
This is why people don't consider it an important job, even when it is becoming more and more important.
The role has a hell of a lot of business value. Specifically in media, the more traffic content receives, the better you can attract sponsors.
I don't think people think of this as a job because most just do it for their personal lives.
If having a social media job was ridiculous, wasn’t it even more ridiculous that companies offered internships for it?
what does this job entail?
he was taken “from a family I’ll never know”
reminds me of a slave narrative
The only people we see ordering the stormtroopers (who are all named with dehumanising numbers) throughout the Force Awakens are white officers.
similarly to slavery
Consider that the first human forms we see in The Force Awakens are those of the stormtroopers, who are moved in tightly packed ships and dispatched to commit genocide against a noncompliant population.
comparable to american history
But if all the stormtroopers are black, the Force Awakens can be read as a tale specifically rooted in black oppression and, more importantly, black awakening and rebellion; indeed, it could be read as the first science fiction film of the Black Lives Matter era.
this might have been done purposefully, in which case there could be many arguments made. I have not seen the movie and know nothing about it otherwise I would make an argument.
what if under every white stormtrooper’s armour was a black human?
Socially we are conditioned to think that this would not be the norm.
it forced me to decide what matters.
teachers change their mind so many times. I once had a professor tell me to start a paper over from scratch, and the very next day he told me to go back to my original paper. So knowing what matters to a professor is very helpful.
explaining what was “wrong” with the student’s work.
we almost never hear what was right, all we get is the negative feedback
justifying that number.
it makes it a fight between students and teachers
For students, it’s all or nothing. No skipping the directions and no sliding by on partial credit for sloppy, last-minute work.
this helps to ensure students do their work, and hopefully learn from it.
very carefully, clearly and thoroughly.
i think this is what lacks in the current style of grading
Or the specs may be more complex: for instance, the work fulfills the criteria you set out for a good literature review, research proposal or substantial reflection.
this allows the grading to still be similar to the old style.
Our grading system is broken, yet we educators keep using it
We need to find a new way to grade!
they challenge our grading decisions in the hope of squeezing more points out of us -- despite the agonizing care and attention to detail we give to their work. For students, it’s all about maximizing partial credit.
reading this as a student brings up some interesting point. We try to get more points when we believe we deserve them- because of time commitment or other factors. Teachers want so many different aspects in a graded assignment, which is why we argue for partial credit.
we struggle to be fair in giving the same number of points
interesting point that I always struggled with as a student.
Your degree?
This brings me back to the question of if you own your house or car, that you're still paying off. Many college students take loans to pay for college and pay those loans for years after graduation. So, do they own their degree? Does it matter, because they are the main ones benefiting from receiving it.
These fees must all be paid monthly or annually to maintain access and functionality.
I agree with this point. You have to pay for what you own. It brings up the question if you own a house or car, that you are still making payments on.