I think that this definition - while (as others have noted) a little unclear as to what "important literary elements" are, is a good working definition, but the list that follows only works if the part about taking advantage of computer capabilities or contexts is applied. Several of them also exist separate from E-Lit, and without remembering the earlier distinction, the list seemed far too inclusive of works with non-digital hypertext elements. I think moving the sentence, "The confrontation with technology at the level of creation is what distinguishes electronic literature from, for example, e-books, digitized versions of print works, and other products of print authors “going digital,” further up in the piece would help - perhaps before the list as well.