10 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
  2. social-media-ethics-automation.github.io social-media-ethics-automation.github.io
    1. f1] lonelygirl15. November 2023. Page Version ID: 1186146298. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lonelygirl15&oldid=1186146298 (visited on 2023-11-24).

      Lonelygirl15's Wikipedia entry initially presented the creator as a real-life teenage vlogger, but was later revealed to be a scripted project. This example highlights that "authenticity" can be manufactured, and that the audience's trust can ultimately translate into a feeling of betrayal. It also shows that online persona is not just a matter of personal expression, but also involves power and control over narrative. When viewers discover the truth, the strong response reflects a view of authenticity as a social contract between creator and audience

    1. Fig. 6.6 President Obama giving a very different handshakes [f22] to a white man and a Black man (Kevin Durant [f23]). See also this Key & Peele comedy sketch on greeting differences [f24] with Jordan Peele [f25] playing Obama, and also Key & Peele’s Obama’s Anger Translator sketch [f26].# Read/watch more about code-switching here: How Code-Switching Explains The World [f27] ‘Key & Peele’ Is Ending. Here Are A Few Of Its Code Switch-iest Moments [f28] Still, modifications of behavior can also be inauthentic. In the YouTube Video Essay: YouTube: Manufacturing Authenticity (For Fun and Profit!) [f29] by Lindsay Ellis, Ellis explores nuances in authenticity as a YouTuber. She highlights the emotional labor [f30] of keeping emotional expressions consistent with their public persona, even when they are having different or conflicted feelings. She also highlights how various “calls to action” (e.g., “subscribe to my channel”) may be necessary for business and can be (and appear) authentic or inauthentic.

      Authenticity is not fixed but depends on context and community. For example, Obama’s different handshakes show how varied expressions can still be genuine. On the other hand, as Lindsay Ellis points out, creators often perform emotional labor to maintain their persona because it brings benefits. So, authenticity should be analyzed not just by what people do, but why they do it and what advantages they gain

  3. social-media-ethics-automation.github.io social-media-ethics-automation.github.io
    1. Tom Standage. Writing on the Wall: Social Media - The First 2,000 Years. Bloomsbury USA, New York, 1st edition edition, October 2013. ISBN 978-1-62040-283-2.

      What’s newer to me is that Standage defines social media as part of a long tradition of humans sharing news, gossip, and opinions through networks such as coffeehouses, pamphlets, and letters, rather than a sudden invention of the Internet. The emergence of the Internet has greatly increased the speed of information dissemination, from a quantitative change to a qualitative change. Perhaps the problems we face today, such as misinformation and fake news, are not actually new problems.

    1. Later, sometime after the printing press, Stondage highlights how there was an unusual period in American history that roughly took up the 1900s where, in America, news sources were centralized in certain newspapers and then the big 3 TV networks. In this period of time, these sources were roughly in agreement and broadcast news out to the country, making a more unified, consistent news environment (though, of course, we can point out how they were biased in ways like being almost exclusively white men).

      Stoneditch pointed out an unusual period of media concentration in the United States in the 1900s. This centralization creates a more unified national narrative that feels very different from today’s fragmented social media environment. This “solidarity” can silence minority voices because, as the passage points out, those mainstream newsrooms are dominated by white people, resulting in limited diversity in the news media, further increasing the promotion of a single group narrative.

  4. Oct 2025
    1. When we think about how data is used online, the idea of a utility calculus can help remind us to check whether we’ve really got enough data about how all parties might be impacted by some actions. Even if you are not a utilitarian, it is good to remind ourselves to check that we’ve got all the data before doing our calculus. This can be especially important when there is a strong social trend to overlook certain data. Such trends, which philosophers call ‘pernicious ignorance’, enable us to overlook inconvenient bits of data to make our utility calculus easier or more likely to turn out in favor of a preferred course of action.

      People will ignore the feelings of the "photographed" and only consider the interests of the "audience" and "publisher". For instance, when people doing public events, blogger are more concerned about how many likes the photos they send out can get, but they ignore the privacy and consent of the people in the photos.

    1. 4.2.3. What we lose in simplifying# As you can see in the apple example, any time we turn something into data, we are making a simplification.[1] If we are counting the number of something, like apples, we are deciding that each one is equivalent. If we are writing down what someone said, we are losing their tone of voice, accent, etc. If we are taking a photograph, it is only from one perspective, etc. Different simplifications are useful for different tasks. Any given simplification will be helpful for some tasks and be unhelpful for others. See also, this saying in statistics: All models are wrong, but some are useful [d18]

      When we answer simple questions such as “Where are you from” or “How many people are there in your family” in our daily lives, in fact, complex social identities, cultural backgrounds and statistical standards are often involved. when people ask me where I'm from, I often have to explain whether it's my place of birth, my nationality, or where I've lived for a long time. Data simplification helps us process information quickly, but it can also overlook the unique circumstances of individuals.

  5. social-media-ethics-automation.github.io social-media-ethics-automation.github.io
    1. Steven Tweedie. This disturbing image of a Chinese worker with close to 100 iPhones reveals how App Store rankings can be manipulated. February 2015. URL: https://www.businessinsider.com/photo-shows-how-fake-app-store-rankings-are-made-2015-2 (visited on 2024-03-07). [c2] Sean Cole. Inside the weird, shady world of click farms. January 2024. URL: https://www.huckmag.com/article/inside-the-weird-shady-world-of-click-farms (visited on 2024-03-07).

      Document [c2] Sean Cole. Inside the weird, shady world of click farms describes how "click farms" operate: a large number of workers or automated equipment artificially create likes, retweets or download data in a short period of time to manipulate the popularity rankings on network platforms. This reminds me of the literature [c1], both of which reveal that bots can coerce public opinion and influence real society by manipulating public opinion through sociology and psychology.

    1. n the other hand, some bots are made with the intention of harming, countering, or deceiving others. For example, people use bots to spam advertisements at people. You can use bots as a way of buying fake followers [c8], or making fake crowds that appear to support a cause (called Astroturfing [c9]). As one example, in 2016, Rian Johnson, who was in the middle of directing Star Wars: The Last Jedi, got bombarded by tweets that all originated in Russia (likely making at least some use of bots). “I’ve gotten a rush of tweets – coordinated tweets. Like, somewhere else on the internet th

      These bots can serve as moderators of social public opinion. When a group is overly aggressive, they can divide these groups by looking for evidence and presenting new viewpoints. I think this is also one of the correct uses of bots. If these bots are designed to remain neutral, they can create a harmonious public opinion environment.

  6. Sep 2025
    1. Virtue Ethics# Sources [b24] [b25] [b26] [b27] Acting in ways consistent with the virtues (e.g., courage, truthfulness, wittiness, friendliness, etc.) leads to flourishing of an individual. In acting virtuously, you are training yourself to become more virtuous, and you will subsequently be able to act even more virtuously. Different groups have different sets of virtues: Aristotle: Courage, Temperance, Liberality, Magnificence, Magnanimity, Proper Ambition, Patience, Truthfulness, Wittiness, Friendliness, Modesty, Righteous indignation, Intelligence, Science, Theoretical Wisdom Quaker SPICES [b28] (Simplicity, Peace, Integrity, Community, Equality, Stewardship) US Army LDRSHP [b29]: Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, Personal Courage Key figures: Aristotle [b30], 300s BCE Greece [b31] Martha Nussbaum [b32], present USA

      Many large companies like to display their "corporate values" and hold their employees to accountable. I believe these modern "virtues" are not intended to promote the personal growth and well-being of employees, but rather to be used as a tool of control, transcending the law, to shape employee behavior in the interests of the company.

    2. Being and becoming an exemplary person (e.g., benevolent; sincere; honoring and sacrificing to ancestors; respectful to parents, elders and authorities, taking care of children and the young; generous to family and others). These traits are often performed and achieved through ceremonies and rituals (including sacrificing to ancestors, music, and tea drinking), resulting in a harmonious

      The idea of ​​"bringing the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people" reminds me of how social media recommendation algorithms work. Algorithms typically promote content that gets the most interactions . The fundamental reason is that the software incentivizes users to generate more traffic, which makes the company profitable. However, the reality is that this often leads to more people creating conflict.