On top of this, the polarization of traditional news media by Fox News and others is poisoning the capacity of the democratic system to build a sustainable consensus around what is left of the political center, as shown by the debacle of the American gun-control debate.
Hold on, name the other companies, don't just save democrats asses.
Nationalism and xenophobia take over.
Is this happening now? Slow-boiling pot....
The bottom line is simple: Citizens will continue to support their democratic capitalist systems so long as there is reasonable equality of opportunity and a humane social safety net.
examples of these?
ocial media distorts the free flow of facts that has been the lifeblood of democratic capitalism. In the past, disruptions to employment brought about by rapid technological change resulted in a movement of lower-skilled jobs to newer industries. But now we may no longer be capable of providing enough new jobs in areas where they are needed.
Interesting point-- want to talk more about this in class.
showing signs of deep, systemic sickness in the United States, Europe and Australasia, even as varieties of state or authoritarian capitalism are slowly becoming entrenched around the world, particularly in China and Russia.
How?
here is in my heart no taint of malice toward the ex-slaveholders. Many of them were not sinners above all others, but were in some sense the slaves of the slave system, for slavery was a power in the State greater than the State itself.
This is an interesting part of history that hasn't truly been expressed in any other text we've covered. "No taint or malice toward the ex-slaveholders". Is this true for all African Americans or just Frederick Douglass? People still hold hate in their hearts because of slavery, so clearly this isn't a totally accurate account. Also, we've never thought of slaveholders as a slave of the system. How accurate is that account in and of itself?
Free speech and a free press, as the terms are generally understood in other States, have never existed in Texas. In fact, the citizens of other states cannot appreciate the state of affairs in Texas without actually experiencing it. The official reports of lawlessness and crime, so far from being exaggerated, do not tell the whole truth.
Is this for everyone or in reference to African Americans? How was it not free speech or free press? Is this an accurate account?
. In some counties the civil officers are all, or a portion of them, members of the Klan.
Civil officers as K.K.K. members. People even argue this today with Black Lives Matter v. Blue Lives Matter. How do we differentiate the truth? Why has this trend continued and how do we solve it? Don't we need to trust the people in blue suits or are civil officers.... After all the word that comes to describe them is "civil."
ree Negroes, or mulattoes, or usually associating with freedmen, free Negroes, or mulattoes on terms of equality, or living in adultery or fornication with a freedwoman, free Negro, or mulatto,
What is with all these classifications? What happened to just "human"? Does that even come across to people in this era? Why has it changed today?
Where are the statues in the former slave states honoring the very large part of the Southern population (beginning with the four million slaves) that sided with the Union rather than the Confederacy? Where are the monuments to the victims of slavery or to the hundreds of black lawmakers who during Reconstruction served in positions ranging from United States senator to justice of the peace to school board official? Excluding blacks from historical recognition has been the other side of the coin of glorifying the Confederacy.
Good point.
“our” history and culture
"A great nation does not hide its history. It faces its flaws and corrects them."
Blacks, wrote Chief Justice Roger B. Taney (a statue of whom was removed from public display in Baltimore this week), were and would always be aliens in America.
Another example of not accepting a culture, flip-side of my other point.
Should American nationality be based on shared values, regardless of race, ethnicity and national origin, or should it rest on “blood and soil,” to quote the neo-Nazis in Charlottesville, Va., whom Trump has at least partly embraced?
Is it possible to have shared values in a culture that is so diverse? And if so, how? And is it moral to guide other's morals? Is it moral to say that my truth is right and your truth is wrong? (Even though yes, slavery is awful, the confederacy was not the brightest moment of our history, but that doesn't take away from the fact that people do see the confederacy in a different light that honors their culture.)