34 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2021
    1. Governments can also implement schemes like mobile libraries that will ensure children can get the reading materials they need.

      Mobile libraries seems like an excellent idea for the children that cannot get to a library, perhaps their parents don't have a working vehicle, or can't afford to get to one because of gas or distance.

    2. “Children's emotional needs are completely being neglected at the moment,” Rapa says. So although children have been given abundant material on the physical effects of the disease and the ways to avoid contagion, government health campaigns have provided very little guidance on how to cope with the stress. “[Children] are now experts on viral transmission, but they're not being taught how we can talk about this and deal with such important things.”

      This was a concern of mine- that we were allowing children to become so afraid of the virus and not considering the emotional toll all of this has had on their mental and emotional states.

    3. children are highly perceptive of their parents’ and carers’ worries and it seems likely that they will absorb some of this angst – whether it’s worry about the disease itself, the job losses, or the strains of isolation.

      How many children were afraid they would lose loved ones? How many were scared they would never get to see their teachers, friends, family, or neighbors again?

    4. Van Lancker agrees that access to a quiet study area, with an internet connection, is a huge issue for many people. “Those are the circumstances which are not very likely for children living in poverty and over-crowded households,

      Even in my own neighborhood, which I would consider a fairly nice, middle class neighborhood, I have heard the neighbors not having enough computers for the kids to each be able to get work done. Eventually, schools allowed them to check out computers during the pandemic which would solve this issue.

    5. A recent study from the UK found that children from richer families are spending about 30% more time on home learning than those from poorer families.

      Very interesting to see an actual percentage on this. Though I suppose it is not surprising, I find the percentage to be high.

    6. Some studies have found that richer children actually improve their reading performance over the period, while it is the poorer families who tend to show the greater losses, since they have fewer educational resources over the holidays.

      I also wonder how much more the poorer children get read to over the summer. I wonder if it is due to the lack of time because parents are working more for less, combined with lack of reading games or ability to find good books that they were be interested in to read (especially the older kids).

    7. since they will also lack the opportunity for intellectually nourishing activities like music lessons, trips to the museum and library, or summer camps.

      I feel very strongly that these types of enrichment activities and learning opportunities are extremely valuable and important for our children to be introduced to.

    8. If schools don’t reopen until September, many children will have spent more than 20 weeks in a row away from school – an unprecedented amount of time away from education, meaning we can’t simply extrapolate from the existing data.

      For those that don't return- but I believe that all schools at least had online options. Even then, we are still likely seeing a lack of resources and a drop in teachers able to teach.

    9. The more serious concern is that, when schools are closed for long periods, many children will begin to forget what they already know – a regression that will be much harder to remedy.

      I recognized that my oldest child had forgotten concepts that she was learning in school just before the pandemic closure. She had to spend time re-learning them and it was harder for me to teach them to her because I didn't know the methods her teachers had used prior- making it even more confusing for her.

    10. Some clues to these effects come from studies of short-term school closures due to snow. In 2007, Dave Marcotte, a professor in public affairs at American University in Washington DC, examined the standardised test scores of third, fifth and eighth graders in Maryland. The effects of school closures were greatest for the youngest children, with each lost day resulting in around 0.57% fewer children reaching the expected grades in reading and maths. The average school lost around 5 days, in total, due to bad weather – resulting in around a 3% drop in the overall pass rate – equivalent to roughly one child in a classroom of 30.

      This is very interesting. I always considered snow days as simply a normal, and fun day off for the children who get them. However, is this drop just for the snow days, or are these children also missing out on school days on their own terms, as well?

    11. Some experts, such as Wim Van Lancker, a sociologist at the University of Leuven in Belgium, go as far as to describe it at as “a social crisis in the making”.

      I felt this way, as well, though I am lucky that my children seem to have bounced back very well and are back to a fairly full social life, in many ways. I do know, however, that there are so many more children that are still struggling from having missed out on a year of social activities that continue to show effects.

    12. Crucially, children may become carriers who transmit the virus to the most vulnerable members of society, such as their grandparents. After all, they’re not exactly known for their fastidious hygiene.

      This is important to remember as some of these children are going home to grandparents or even parents that have health issues so it is more of a concern in their homes.

    13. But according to Richard Armitage, in the division of public health and epidemiology at the University of Nottingham, those legitimate scientific questions about the effectiveness of school closures should not be taken as a justification for re-opening them prematurely. “An absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence,” he says.

      This is an excellent point that perhaps we don't all think about. I know that I try to consider whether or not it is safer keeping my children home than to send them to school. I decided one child really needed the school environment and they social and physical aspects she was not getting by homeschooling. But is it safer or are we just getting lucky so far?

    14. According to Unesco, the education of nearly 1.6 billion pupils in 190 countries has so far been affected – that’s 90% of the world’s school-age children. And at the time of writing, there are still no definite plans for opening the schools of around half of these children.

      While this had a devastating impact for so many Americans, I was glad to see that many schools here did reopen in the fall, in some way (part-time or in cohorts), so that many children were able to get some of the help and access to the many resources they so desperately needed.

    15. In general, children with more siblings appear to develop social skills at a quicker rate, so it may be that it’s only children who are worst affected.

      This is something I hadn't thought about. For children who are the only child, they wouldn't have a sibling at home to socialize or play with, whereas other children with larger families may have the ability to still play imaginative games and that extra companionship.

    16. While the child’s intellectual development may be the most obvious victim of these shutdowns, it’s by no means the only thing at risk. Teachers are often the first people to notice deteriorating mental health among their students and to encourage them to seek treatment, and many schools provide counselling and psychotherapy on site. In the US, for instance, around 13% of adolescents receive mental healthcare from their schools. Indeed, for a sizeable chunk – 35% – of vulnerable adolescents being treated for mental health issues, schools are the only source of support for their problems.

      I think this is a major issue for the adolescents that are already struggling. They are almost instantly and completely shut off from seeing counselors at school and even from having teachers that are able to recognize the issues they may be having and are able to reach out with help or resources, as they say here.

    17. If nothing is done to make up these amplified class divides, the effects may linger for years. “The younger you are, the more likely it is that there will be consequences well into your adult life,” says Van Lancker. “We know these effects accumulate over time.”

      I certainly agree that this will be a bigger issue for the younger folks, I also think that the kids who are young teens or tweens will have struggled because it is a crucial age for social activities and development.

    1. But pretending that everything is fine — and that no extraordinary measures are needed — is a recipe for disaster.

      It does seem as though these children must have some extra help to move forward. However, how will we be able to have the extra staff to do so and where will the money come from to pay their higher salaries to do the extra work?

    2. emote instruction was clearly a factor in driving what researchers call disenrollment. For example, research by Thomas S. Dee, a professor at Stanford University, and his associates finds that schools that went strictly remote experienced a 42 percent increase in disenrollment compared with those that offered full-time in-person learning. Beyond that, as The Times recently reported, more than a million children who had been expected to enroll in local schools did not show up, either in person or online: “The missing students were concentrated in the younger grades, with the steepest drop in kindergarten — more than 340,000 students.”

      I also saw this, as well! We have several neighbors whose children simply did not participate online. I fear for their future and wonder how they will catch up, if at all. I wonder if they will have to repeat their previous grades, or how that will be handled.

    3. Children’s advocates at the United Nations got it right last month when they admonished governments around the globe for reacting to the pandemic by ending in-person schooling for long periods instead of using mitigation strategies to contain infection. This communiqué, issued by UNESCO and UNICEF, noted that the shutdown placed children at risk of developmental setbacks from which many of them might never recover, pointed out that primary and secondary schools are not among the main drivers of the pandemic and called for governments to resume in-person instruction as quickly as possible.

      I agree in some ways, though I do think they needed time to learn and discover ways to navigate the situation. My daughter's school was able to reopen school by splitting the students by last names and having them go to school on alternating days. It allowed for smaller class sizes by having half the students in person one day, and staying home and doing online learning the other days.

    4. Perhaps the most grotesque of these minimizing arguments holds that concerns about learning loss are being manufactured by educational testing companies with dollar signs in their eyes.

      This is something I had never even thought about!

    5. Among other things, it notes that the pandemic has widened existing opportunity and achievement gaps and made high schoolers more likely to drop out. As the authors say: “The fallout from the pandemic threatens to depress this generation’s prospects and constrict their opportunities far into adulthood. The ripple effects may undermine their chances of attending college and ultimately finding a fulfilling job that enables them to support a family.” Unless steps are taken to fill the pandemic learning gap, the authors say, these people will earn less over their lifetimes.

      This is a very unfortunate effect from the pandemic. I hope that we are able mitigate this and move forward in a positive way.

    6. An analysis by N.W.E.A., a nonprofit that provides academic assessments, for example, found that Latino third graders scored 17 percentile points lower in math in the spring of 2021, compared to the typical achievements of Latino third graders in the spring of 2019. The decline was 15 percentile points for Black students and 14 percentile points for Native American students, compared with similar students in the past. As Sarah Mervosh of The New York Times describes the situation, the pandemic amplified disadvantages rooted in racial and socioeconomic inequality, transforming an educational gap into a gulf.

      Personally, I don't feel as though is enough information here to show they are struggling more since they aren't listing the numbers for other students. I do see they are comparing to the same group in previous years, but I would want to see more statistics on this.

    7. That story is coming to light in studies and reports that lay out the alarming extent to which all groups of students are behind where they should be in a normal academic year and how the most vulnerable students are experiencing the steepest drop-offs in learning.Image

      I know many parents were and are very stressed about how their child(ren) seemed behind, yet I feel as though most children were in the same position, being somewhat behind, academically, in some ways due to the pandemic. I am very interested in seeing how long this will affect academics into the future.

    8. The analysis shows that many states have urged localities to return to in-person schooling while promoting policies that conflict with the goal of educating young people in safety. For example, as of this month, nearly one-fourth of the states had banned Covid-19 vaccination requirements, hamstringing localities that want to prioritize student safety. As of early August, only 29 states had recommended that students wear masks — down from the 44 states that did so last fall — and nine states had banned masking requirements.

      I am not sure where to stand on this one, in some cases. I personally have been vaccinated and my family, as well. However, I do see how some individuals have medical conditions and their doctors have advised them not to vaccinate. In these cases, perhaps their just needs to be more scientific literature available.

    9. These policy failures are compounding at a time when the highly infectious Delta variant is surging and the coronavirus seems likely to become a permanent feature of life.

      I truly hope this isn't a permanent issue for anyone, but I also don't see this as likely because we have already seen the world becoming somewhat more normal again in many areas. I will agree that it sure seems to be dragging on and very slowly are we making progress.

    10. The resulting learning setbacks range from grave for all groups of students to catastrophic for poor children.

      I believe these catastrophic setbacks ranged from the inability to access the food that these children usually get at school each day, to being stuck at home for the children who may be abused (or they are more likely to be abused if they weren't before), depression in many children due to lack of social activities, the inability to get work done for so many children because they simply don't have access to the internet, and even the many children falling behind they have little or no extra help with concepts they are struggling with which then compounds the issues.

    1. His decision is never dependent on ads, or a particular review, or whether a film sounds like something he would enjoy. Instead, he says, “I live by base rates. I don’t read a book or see a movie unless it’s highly recommended by people I trust.

      While I see his point here, I can't help but imagine if I were to live this way. I trust many people around me and respect their opinions- yet, when it comes to a movie I watch, I rarely seek out the opinions of those around me. I know that we all have such different values and interests so while I could understand why someone liked a particular movie, it doesn't mean it would interest me as much. I like to pick my movies, clothes, food, etc. based upon my own likes and interests.

    2. “You can’t improve intuition. Perhaps, with very long-term training, lots of talk, and exposure to behavioral economics, what you can do is cue reasoning, so you can engage System 2 to follow rules. Unfortunately, the world doesn’t provide cues. And for most people, in the heat of argument the rules go out the window.

      This is an interesting statement. I never thought about 'improving intuition' but it just seems to me that you can still improve the thought process or invoke more thought to prevent disastrous outcomes.

    3. For example, while present bias has so far proved intractable, employers have been able to nudge employees into contributing to retirement plans by making saving the default option; you have to actively take steps in order to not participate. That is, laziness or inertia can be more powerful than bias

      I also believe some of this can be simply because when we know we have to accomplish something for our future, it is easier to procrastinate because we believe we have plenty of time to do, or that it isn't pressing as getting our work done, or that it can wait until we finish the house work. Then we simply forget. Perhaps that's just me!

  2. Sep 2021
    1. mocracies must advertise democracy. With-out emulating propaganda methods typical of authoritarian regimes, democracies should support literacy on democratic decisionmaking on both local and national level and on the values that guide public service and democratic processes, while strengthening anti-corruption efforts. As the democratic model has long been taken for granted, states should make a greater effort to raise individual awareness of democratic freedoms and civic responsibilities, and encourage impactful participation

      This is also an important take away. This reminds me of the paper we read about readers- we need to educate the individuals, so that each individual can and will think for themselves. This is so crucial! When we have individual citizens capable of utilizing tools and researching (properly) for themselves, rather than simply watching their favorite news station or listening to their friends and family's perspective, then we can truly have progress in the form of moving forward with educated responses.

    2. Evidence suggests, however, that political regimes are not good predictors of pandemic management. Some democracies, among them Australia, Germany, Greece, New Zealand, and South Korea among others were fairly successful in containing the virus and limiting deaths. Others, like the United States, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Mexico, and India have not performed as well.

      This is interesting. I believed, and still do, that America did not perform as well with combating Covid simply because our nation is very divided about what is real, what is true, and what is helpful. I do not believe we came together enough during this pandemic to work as a unified front. I would be interested to look into why the other countries that also performed less than ideally did so, as well- was it because they also were not unified, they were less prepared financially, or they simply didn't have the emergency response or leadership abilities.

    3. Countries who relied on science early on produced good results and received international praise.

      I think this is a major key point here- many Americans are still arguing over whether or not the science is "real" or leading us astray. I believe that more of us should have respected the true scientists and paid attention to (or sought out) real peer-reviewed articles, rather than simply following our desired news sources or friends' social media posts.