foraging together or separately

I don't understand how this can help with understanding the role of behavior.

No mention of quails in the conclusion?

Abstract: De Valois and De Valois [Vis. Res.33, 1053 (1993)] showed that to explain hue appearance, S-cone signals have to be combined with M versus L opponent signals in two different ways to produce red-green and yellow-blue axes, respectively. Recently, it has been shown that color appearance is normal for individuals with genetic mutations that block S-cone input to blue-ON ganglion cells. This is inconsistent with the De Valois hypothesis in which S-opponent konio-geniculate signals are combined with L-M signals at a third processing stage in cortex. Instead, here we show that color appearance, including individual differences never explained before, are predicted by a model in which S-cone signals are combined with L versus M signals in the outer retina.

In this paper, they had 4 participants wear tinted contacts for 8-12 hours a day for between 10 and 24 days. (or stayed in a room with filters over the lights for 4 hours, or goggles for 4 hours, there was a lot variation.) They measured the appearance of unique yellow before and after the trials.

They found that if you change the gain of the L-M ratio you can change the "null point" where yellow is. If the gain is plastic, you can move the sensation of yellow.

Insects are a subset of arthropods.

How did you determine which neurons were directionally selective??

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism

What does the I stand for in I-NGF?

How did they block the endosome from entering the cell body? Ddid they relegate it to the axon or did they stop it from re-uptaking?

Do you guys have a better explanation for "ex vivo" then just "tissue removed from an organism"

What makes an endosome early?

So even though the mutation is good for the fish, It is especially bad for predators of fish, who do not have the tolerance, but have a poisoned population to consume.

But they already demonstrated above that the embryos showed no difference in gene expression until the polllutants were administered. Then they expressed different genes. Wouldnt this mean that, in early development at least, that they are fine in the ancesteral enironment as well.

So the compounds are more similar to pesticides then they let on in the beginning. Different one do effect the same pathways like pesticides

"Who knows if I am not a pastime to her more than she is to me?" <-eg. Anthroprocentric

Anthropomorphic= helpful Anthropocentric= blinding

What? I have never heard that before.

Valid

Expression of romantic love?

Ha, as a Calvinist shouldn't it be that God has given them the desire to suppress the truth that God has implanted within their minds?

The mantra of the Sunday Assembly (an a-theistic church) is Live Better. Help Often. Wonder More. They encourage seeking out these wonder-filled experiences, but not everyone takes a wonder filled experience as impetus to believe in God. I can wonder at the world and its intricacy, be aware of how small and insignificant I am, and find the universe AMAZING without it having a deity.

See, this reminds me of psychics saying thing like: "You have to believe in my powers for them to work!"

Amen! ;)

However, evidence of God is not like evidence of other people. We can have conversations with other people, can see other people. In contrast, all must be supposed with a divine entity.

In the book "Born Believers", by Justin L. Barret he addresses this concept and explains why, scientifically, such a sense should arise in human beings.

True!

Something pressed home to me in my science classes is that "Science can't prove anything." Everything we think we know can be uprooted by new evidence.

It is possible to start with belief based on such a foundation. There are many things that cannot be proven or known. But if evidence comes a long with does bring the unknowable into the knowable, then it is only right to re-evaluate such a foundation.