11 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2020
    1. We came to realize that in many of our projects, we act as the person structuring others’ knowledge. We find a good visual representation of this structure that can function as an anchor. So, with that in mind, am I still a graphic designer? Am I an information architect? I don’t know. But these are the things that I’m more excited about doing, and that’s what I provide to my clients.

      In the end (citing Libby Marrs essay), design very much comes down to the container its placed in and the subject, in this case the client, that is being communicated

    2. When you talk about design as the structure of thought, I feel like that’s a perfect way of articulating what design is.

      Interesting way to frame the practice of design is not just something to practice but also some to think with

    1. I, too, see a problem with Premium Generic defaultness — not as an aesthetic, but the idea that a set of signifiers could contain inherent denotative meaning and virtue.

      Premium Generic defaultness as just a PR stunt to market an inherent "meaning" or "virtue" to a product designed to be sold.

    2. This magical aura of authenticity keeps alive the belief in capital-G-D-Graphic-Design (I’m going to keep using the capital G and D here to emphasize that I’m talking about graphic design as an institution-named industry) as something essential, something that exists independently of the marketplace.

      This is similar to my own take that design is being marketed as essential and is sold in a Ponzi scheme fashion; that the high gates of institutions need to maintain the narrative that "authenticity" or what is required to graphic design can only be accessed through the high price tags of institutions.

    3. And that’s because to treat graphic design like it’s a service, where it makes sense to optimize time and labor for maximum efficiency, undermines the aura of indispensability, superiority, and yes, authenticity that institutions such as design schools and “professional associations” rely on in order to justify the massive dollar signs they place on themselves via tuition, and member fees.

      I'm assuming Libby means that Rob Giampietro is on the other side of the argument where viewing design as something to be optimized for efficiency undermines that high dollar price tag that institutions have marketed as only possible by studying with them. But she is on the side that, that thinking is irrelevant to how design ought to progress.

    4. The Premium Generic is just a style at the end of the day, an assortment of visual language resulting from decades of designers adapting to tightening industry constraints.

      I really question whether it is just a visual language and not representative more deep and even sinister considering this whole essay

    5. But could we instead embrace post-authentic normcore as a design methodology, in service to causes of our own determination? Can we figure out how to be radically adaptable, design using default systems, but in a strategic way — to conserve our energy in exploitative situations so we can go full-throttle in others?

      The answer to these questions, I'm convinced, is through employing our services towards causes that are ultimately and fundamentally focused on the public good. There cannot be any inkling of goals towards profit, otherwise it not only is prone to Premium Generic (or its counterpart, Regular Generic) but also prone to the proliferation of a capitalistic self-destruction that forcibly tries to sustain itself through constant transformation, or rather "perfuming," of the same shit that is capitalism.

    6. This approach to designing with defaults is plain old Generic — it’s not sexy like the Premium Generic, just plainly literal. The less frivolous language and design, the more transparent. It’s not presenting its content in a crystal goblet, but in a single-use clear plastic cup.

      This is an interesting take as well when considering the diction evokes a critical lens but also, perhaps but also perhaps, intentionally putting side-by-side the next take that talks about the "absence of graphic design" that Premium Generic would use, in a way that criticizes Premium Generic and that Regular Generic is superior in someway

    7. This new normcore commercial design methodology visualizes the post-authentic image of nature: the romanticized raw material of modern industry and global supply chains, instead of the raw material of the premodern, hyperlocal, or pastoral outdoors. It means opting for raw plastic instead of raw wood — embracing the beauty of the factory default or the mass-producible template, the path of least resistance.

      This is a very interesting idea as it relates to the culture and overwhelming narrative for product design: frictionless, user-friendly design is just asking for "raw plastic" and handing ease of use in a silver platter. Neither the "raw plastic" or "raw wood" make a difference when the foundation for each approach is still capitalism.

  2. Oct 2020
    1. it is remarkably hard to consistently arrange shapes on a page without a basic system to guide the decisions.

      As to why design systems is important but also that phenomenon is simply a derivative of this concept

    1. The anthropocentric world view is about dominion and having extra-human life and the rest of the planet reduced to mere resources, to be exploited by man at will.

      Anthropocentrism is a literal component for capitalism and since human-centered design founds itself in that vein, it becomes a tool for capitalistic exploitation