Questions can reflect not only a curiosity about the world but a desire to make the world better.
a fundamental aspect of academic research as well...
Questions can reflect not only a curiosity about the world but a desire to make the world better.
a fundamental aspect of academic research as well...
many things we accept as givens could be otherwise.
critical thinking: how did this come to be this way? Is so and so 'natural' or circumstance?
how to foster a lifelong disposition to question what one has been told (thereby supporting their development as participants in a democracy and as human beings).
our videos on critical thinking espoused these larger societal goals...
“K-W-L” charts in which students are asked to consider what they already know about a particular topic, what they’d like to know more about, and then, later, what they learned
and add the +, what they still want to know. KWL+, a model for research, actually...
By inviting their questions, we unleash the power of intrinsic motivation because all of us tend to develop more enthusiasm for, and ultimately become more skillful at, pursuing questions about which we’re genuinely curious than those handed to us by someone else.
which is why it is easier to research and write about 'your' questions...you are motivated to do the assignment more, I think...
encouraging kids to come up with the questions that matter to them.
and adults, as in college research projects...
What’s required is a continual focus on creating a classroom that is about thinking rather than just absorbing information.
critical thinking as we've defined it...
What the best of these share is that they’re open-ended. Sometimes, in fact, no definitive right answer can be found at all. And even when there is one – or at least when there is reason to prefer some responses to others – the answer isn’t obvious and can’t be summarized in a sentence.
bingo.
The least interesting questions are those with straightforward factual answers.
which is why research questions are open-ended...and critical...
want their institutions to address academic integrity concerns—albeit via a proactive approach
Pro-active: tell us the rules instead of punishing us for not following them...give students chances to REVISE their work, if there was a question of unfair use...
wn learning.
This is the big question in my classes right now...
s on
I love all the images and graphs in this article...they are a different way to process the information/knowledge
no instruction manual.”
Until we make one for our class!!
their cognition—a developing area of research—adding that students tend to “crave shared spaces of conversation
this is real learning: Dialogic and conversational
Tools to this end include the university’s own Student AI Use Scale.
Check this out! It is interesting and a good place to start the Guide activity in class today...
scaffolding assignments
This means structuring a writing process or different checkpoints like we do in this class...
tools that have been “marketed to students as quick and efficient ways to get the highest grades” play into a “model of education that places point-getting and grade-earning over learning,” he said. One possible implication for faculty? Using alternative assessment practices “that take pressure away from earning a grade and that instead recenter learning.”
Yes! I could see doing a study about the value of contract grading for resolving issues with misuse of AI...
For some students, it’s like having a 24-7 tutor.”
a 24-7 tutor is a valuable tool, also since it is free for students now (boodlebox)
Well, I could just ChatGPT it.’ But in reality, figuring it out on my own or talking to another physical human being—that’s good for you,’
Good point!
Partey, who graduated from the University of Nevada at Reno in May with a major in communications and minor in public health, said using generative AI became t
personal evidence from a real source/informant (ethos)
35 percent say there’s been no change, and 23 percent say it’s more valuable now. Fewer, 18 percent, s
value of a survey result article is lots of logos or logical evidence to appeal or prove their points.
reate new majors or academic programs focused
interesting idea
Adult students—many of whom are already working—are most likely to say that institutions should offer training on how to use AI tools professionally and ethically, at 57 percent.
This is our population, ie you all...
students again say they want their institutions to offer—but not necessarily require—training on how t
offering vs. requiring training for students...or part of Gen ed course? Or a separate Gen ed course?
Men—who also report using generative AI for things like brainstorming ideas and completing assignments at higher rates than their women and nonbinary peers—are also more likely to indicate that the net effect has been positive
male bias towards AI use...(not what I've found among teachers...) What do we think about male AI voices vs. female?
slight plurality of students (29 percent) is somewhat positive about faculty use of AI for creating assignments and other tasks,
interesting, I wouldn't think to do this
Fewer support a return to handwritten tests or bluebooks for som
What do our students think? (part of journaling rationale)
pressure to get good grades (37 percent over all). Being pressed for time (27 percent) and not really caring about academic integrity policies (26 percent) are other reasons students chose. There are some differences acro
reasons/pressure for Cheating: 1. grades, 2. time, 3. don't care about policies
Performance pressures
Spoiler, I already read this so I must have known this was coming up...
Community college students are less likely to report using AI for coursewor
Is this finding about CC students because it is less pressure? More pressure for grades/passing = more use of A!?
Fewer students report using generative AI to complete assignments for them (25 percent) or write full essays (19 percent).
but maybe just didn't tell on themselves? Either way, this is encouraging.
Did the student first read what was summarized?
Yes! This is an important distinction
brainstorming ideas (55 percent), asking it questions like a tutor (50 percent)
I think this is appropriate and strategic use...
85 percent, indicate they’ve used generative AI for coursework
I wonder if prompted by their teachers or on their own initiative/exploration... probably the latter..
1,047 students from 166 two-
Big sample! Seems like a legit survey
e seven
7 takeaways
having mixed effects on their critical thinking abilities,
mixed effects, or some might not realize what critical thinking abilities are...
students
the most important voice, since educators should be here to teach...many in higher ed are here to research (and supposed to teach, but don't very well...)
artificial intelligence for teaching
I agree it is questionable for teaching...
skills, traits, and resources
skills traits AND RESOURCES
Ability to be successful in college didn’t behave like intelligence or other test scores. Instead, success seemed to be constrained by finite resources.
outside causes, finite resources
However, students don’t graduate because they passed a math class. They pass a math class and graduate because they have student capital.
cause vs. effect...
building up energy
building up energy vs. momentum of gatekeeping mechanisms....
elping students gain all those little things that more advantaged students got from their families and environment. I
family factor
Successful students have a large pool of resources, traits, and skills that they can draw from every day and when faced with sudden challenges
key point
student capital
student capital - background wealth of knowledge about being a student...
If someone’s car doesn’t work, perhaps they have the money to fix it or a friend to give them a ride. Student success is complicated.
social capital of being able to help each other out...
getting the right teachers,
a big focus! Research your teachers since you have a choice...
that they don’t know their fractions.”
We hear they can't write paragraphs all the time...is that the most important part of learning? or more of a whole student approach.