74 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2019
    1. A work shouldn’t be considered worthy of canonization in American Literature because of its ambiguity or complexity, but for the magnitude of impact that it made on America as a whole.

      I feel like this is taking a shot at the film/Oscars community and I love it

    2. Some literature is canonized not because of its symbolism, elegance or style, but because of its sheer impact on a society.

      This should be how many things are "canonized"

    3. Yes, all that self-important pandering could be reduced to seven crude words- sorry Emerson.

      I'm not too positive how Self-Reliance relates to the topic at hand right now

    1. Seriously, Madison, cut your losses and stay in Canada

      Interesting take on it all, I can see where you're coming from but it's almost the more "selfish" stance on his part. This seems like it's playing a very "Devil's Advocate" stance just so it can say that it did

    2. selfishness

      In a way due to it supporting the trade financially, but it was something necessary. It's like someone buying all of the expired milk to keep people from drinking it. It keeps people from drinking it, but you still condoned it by telling the store it'll sell if they put it out.

  2. Sep 2019
    1. All the story does is reiterate the societal bounds that women and minority groups have been trying to break.

      Is it "reiterating" if it's one of the first times this has been seriously brought up?

    2. I think the best and most female empowering part of the entire courtship between Winkfield and Princess Unca is when she forgoes her entire belief system and religion to conform to Winkfield’s with about the same amount of resistance that her sister had when she decided to murder the both of them. Or how about when Winkfield “persuaded his wife to conform to European dress”

      I love the sarcasm in this, while still being very truthful

    3. This over-romanticized tale of star-crossed lovers from opposite sides of the world could not reek more of predictability and cliche.

      I get this, It is very Romeo and Juliet, but there's somewhat of an unspoken power imbalance which isn't fully present in most other pieces that use this cliche

    4. I know we all love Pocahontas, but let’s imagine authentic Princess Unca barbie dolls

      I'm not too sure how Pocahontas comes into this. Is it implying Pocahontas barbie dolls?

    1. Nor did it matter that her captors did what many U.S. citizens proudly claim they would do should an invasion happen today

      Interesting to think about this happening in real life, because this is something people would gloat about

    1. One hour I have been in health, and wealthy, wanting nothing. But the next hour in sickness and wounds, and death, having nothing but sorrow and affliction.

      Putting her own life in perspective

    2. how to admiration did the Lord preserve them for His holy ends, and the destruction of many still amongst the English! s

      "Wow, thanks god for not killing us even though it was so easy for you to!"

    3. God seemed to leave his People to themselves, and order all things for His own holy ends. Shall there be evil in the City and the Lord hath not done it?

      Questioning again

    1. God did not leave me to have my impatience work towards Himself, as if His ways were unrighteous. But I knew that He laid upon me less than I deserved.

      Questioning her religion?

    1. I went with a good load at my back (for they when they went, though but a little way, would carry all their trumpery with them).

      She seems to be proud of what she can carry now

    1. Psalm 38.5-6 “My wounds stink and are corrupt, I am troubled, I am bowed down greatly, I go mourning all the day long.”

      Recites bible verses from memory

    2. I then remembered how careless I had been of God’s holy time; how many Sabbaths I had lost and misspent, and how evilly I had walked in God’s sight; which lay so close unto my spirit, that it was easy for me to see how righteous it was with God to cut off the thread of my life and cast me out of His presence forever. Yet the Lord still showed mercy to me, and upheld me; and as He wounded me with one hand, so he healed me with the other.

      Chastises herself when she messes up her allegiance to god

    1. But the Lord renewed my strength still, and carried me along, that I might see more of His power; yea, so much that I could never have thought of, had I not experienced it.

      Heavily focused on God, all thoughts are of him and how he helps her

    1. (except my life)

      Interesting that her "Life" is counted as the one thing that stood, seeing that everything else she was claiming had made her life was gone.

    2. All was gone, my husband gone (at least separated from me, he being in the Bay; and to add to my grief, the Indians told me they would kill him as he came homeward)

      While this does give some context to her gloom, but doesn't excuse the hatred for all around her

    1. It seems imperative that scholars continue to question what truly characterizes American literature within and beyond national boundaries.

      What reasons are there for defining something as "American" Literature other than for us to say its something that belongs to us, going back to the "Black Hole" idea that we discussed in class.

    2. whittled early American literature

      How do you describe what American Literature is just by the examples? How is it set in stone that the texts chosen in this anthology is "American Literature"?

    3. Who determines what counts as American literature?

      Is it just a singular group, or is it people as a whole who decide over time where to place the literature?

  3. www.ncte.org.libproxy.plymouth.edu www.ncte.org.libproxy.plymouth.edu
    1. tribal members could not even speak grammatically in their own "tongues"

      Is it grammatically correct for them though? Does grammar matter if all speakers of the language use the same "Mistakes" as their every-day speaking?

    2. He is not the product of his background

      This shows the clear distinction of being part of your heritage and recognizing how you could grow and evolve your heritage.

    3. and confirm to the white reader that contact with Euro-Americans was the most significant event in the forty-thousand-year history of Native people on this continent-indeed, their citizens seem unable to think or talk of anything else.

      Very similar to the thought of how labeling something "American Literature" boils it down to the "Black Hole" of being just about America.

    4. "I'll take you across one time, two at most," or "I'm at your disposal for the next fifteen minutes, no more." But he gave a basically open-ended agreement-made a contract-and hence the porcupine woman was per- fectly within her rights in both demanding that he return three times and in quilling him to death when he reneged.

      I'm very curious as to when this story was written, if it is possibly about the Europeans.

    5. t does not mean that Tanaina-speaking people literally believe that beavers and porcupines talk to each other, nor does it suggest that the anthropomorphic quality of the protagonists is more than a stylistic convention.

      It's interesting that the author has to explain this to the reader, as if we think so differently of the native Americans that we need to have stuff like this explained

    6. f) these all-the-same people must of course be INDIANS! T

      It's really interesting to think about how the innapropriate term to describe Native-Americans is "Indian" but never "Ethiopes" as they were originally mislabeled, yet still some call them "Indians"

    7. English literature is expected to be in English, and to be therefore accessi- ble first and foremost to English-speaking clients.

      How can you define something to be "In English?" What if the initial novel was released in a different language, but is primarily sold as English copies to the point that it is seen as the "Initial" copy.

    8. On the other hand, there is no such thing as "Native American litera- ture," though it may yet, someday, come into being.

      It is very interesting to think about how difficult it is to define where a piece of literature lies, There is no one true definition, just the ideas of where specific people define other's work as.

  4. Mar 2019