21 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2026
    1. code switching specifically refers to the practice of switching between dialects and languages according to perceived power dynamics

      seeing how switching between dialects differs from people who i bilingual switching between languages.

    2. A 2021 study notes that code switching requires a person to mentalize, or think about thinking. They then have to mentalize about other people, trying to anticipate how they will view them. This adds to the amount of thinking they need to do in daily life, or their “cognitive load.”Having a high cognitive load and consistently having to scan for potential threats can be exhausting and stressful. The authors also note that code switching may result in fewer opportunities for people to express themselves authentically.A 2023 study of restaurant workers also found that higher levels of code switching had associations with shame, depression, and intentions to leave the hospitality industry.However, shaming people when they do code switch can also be harmful. A 2019 study of diverse students in the United States notes that “acting white” is a common accusation among young people and often refers to how a person is speaking.The “acting white accusation” (AWA) is a form of cultural invalidation or a way of policing those who do not conform to the norms of a specific identity. A 2022 study of 401 adults notes that the AWA had associations with anxiety and depression. The effects were more severe when the accusation came from other members of a person’s racial or ethnic group.

      all of these things seem to not only be negative effects of code switching but just effects of being a minority in this country in general.

    1. mproper or non-standard by listeners because of linguistic racism, a form of discrimination targeting the cultural and linguistic practices of Black people and other people of color (Baker-Bell, 2020; Dovchin, 2020).

      Adds an additional cause for why we do this

    1. To reduce the need for code switching, organizations must invest in a diverse workforce and make inclusive actions and behaviors a systemic expectation. By providing training on cross-cultural competence and ensuring equity in processes, leaders can build more inclusive work environments.

      This sounds nice but does it actually work or have individuals been molded to code switch because of previous experiences so they don't trust when a workplace is more diverse?

    2. Another study of Hispanic and Latino professionals revealed that 40 percent regularly code switch

      Multicultural not just the black community

    3. Research shows us that for racial minorities, avoiding stereotypes and downplaying membership in stigmatized racial groups increases their perception of professionalism and improves their ability to be seen as leaders.

      Having done this at previous jobs and then getting promoted just solidifies that it is necessary to move up through a company and there fore you continue the same path and begin to feel like an imposter

    4. 2 Types of Code Switching Strategic code switching happens when employees read the room and tailor their behaviors to the expectations of the workplace. Protective code switching happens when an employee code switches to downplay their identity and thus avoid being stereotyped.

      realizing the reasons and differences in why we engage in some of these actions and categorizing makes it more real and helps connect that its not only you who does this

    1. Did you know that when you do a Google search you might get different results than the person sitting next to you? Google search results are heavily influenced by algorithms, keywords, advertisements, and even social biases.

      excuse me?!?! how did I not know this?

    2. Brainstorm your various search terms

      this is something so simple yet not something i have thought to do in the past with papers for other courses

    1. Starting with one of your sources, use notecards or sticky notes to write out ONE idea or major claim from your summary.

      This doesn't seem organized even though it is a tool to organize ideas. This is hard to visual and must be done to see the true value.

    1. flexible mindset as a writer to experiment with certain techniques, rhetorical appeals, and ways of writing that you have carefully observed and annotated when you previously read.

      continue to remind self of this even after this course. This will come in handy in future work projects and classes.

    1. our goal is to make the conversation interesting enough that readers will want to get involved in it

      I need to have confidence in this that someone else may be interested in the same things as me or that they have questioned the same things as me. Can I do this?

    2. Freire created “culture circles” which based the learning and practice of reading and writing on the issues that his students faced every day of their lives.

      Love this so much! I wish I could see something like this now in my community to help the under represented people

    3. Freire’s focus in education was primarily with adult learners in Brazil, where masses of poor and under-represented workers were denied voting and other political rights because they were never taught to read and write

      Keeping people uneducated in order to control that masses is such a common theme in so many different forms of media I have been exposed to recently. Even watching whats happening in the news today. WE MUST STRIVE TO BETTER OURSELVES IN ORDER TO HELP OTHERS AND THAT INCLUDES BECOMING MORE EDUCATED

    4. Meaningful research involves using the reading and writing strategies we’ve outlined earlier to investigate your own topics that can help you address issues that you and others like you experience, or even think about everyday.

      How can I connect the topic to more than just myself and make it meaningful for my own curiosities as well as building the community around me.

    1. Critical Information Literacy

      So important especially no with the amount of "Fake News" and opinions floating around as facts. Am I actively reading and using outside information to confirm information? Am I sharing credible information?

    2. Curiosity, Engagement:

      Am I actually relating this to things outside of the reading in order to connect and have a deeper understanding, giving the text more meaning?