Alleged
using alleged in the title. word choice, like did he or did he not say that hes quittinf because of loss of independcence. he did. so why are we using alleged?
Alleged
using alleged in the title. word choice, like did he or did he not say that hes quittinf because of loss of independcence. he did. so why are we using alleged?
(RELATED: CBS Aired Ride Along With German Police On Anti-Free Speech Raid Hours After Saying Free Speech Led To Nazis)
absolutely shameless plug
CBS fired Owens’ predecessor, Jeff Fager, in 2018 for sexual misconduct. CBS investigators said that his misconduct was less severe than that of “60 Minutes” founder and original executive producer Don Hewitt. A draft report from those investigators found that “the physical, administrative and cultural separation between ’60 Minutes’ and the rest of CBS News permitted misconduct by some ’60 Minutes’ employees,” according to the Times. CBS has agreed to pay one woman who accused Hewitt of sexual assault over $5 million, the Times reported. The network’s powerful former head, Les Moonves, also resigned in 2018 after multiple women accused him of sexual assault.
im really not sure how we got to this from owens resignation. these are two unrelated topics.
They bring up CBS’s past misconduct to suggest a pattern, even though there’s no clear evidence of wrongdoing in the Kamala Harris interview. This appeals to suspicion—using history to make the current situation seem questionable. It’s more about persuasion than proof.
While Owens’ pined for more independence, past examples of malfeasance at his network demonstrate that the show’s autonomy may have been a double-edged sword.
Owens wanted more independence for his show, but the network’s history of misconduct suggests that too much freedom might have caused problems—making autonomy a double-edged sword.
word choice: double edged sword battle metaphor
“It shows a lot of balls for someone who understands that nobody is untouchable at this at the point,” a CBS insider told The Post, speaking of Pelley’s move to chastise his bosses. A second insider said “Pelley is fed up with corporate disrespect for journalistic independence.”
anonymous sources from CBS.
The president has also criticized the program for being biased under executive producer Bill Owens.
this information has been ommitted from other articles ive read.
he has worked on for more than 20 years.
saying he worked for 20 minutes after the end of a quote. not going into detail on his time at CBS and different roles. this is different than a lot of other articles ive read.
Pelley went rogue at the end of Sunday night’s episode during what appeared to be a simple tribute to Bill Owens, the longtime “60 Minutes” executive producer who quit last week over the company’s heavy-handed interference.
word choice: rogue.
also he quit because of the company's "heavy handed interference" what does this mean. who is interferring? what context are they referring t. keeping it simple but also not direct.
astonishing on-air attack on CBS owner Paramount
word choice. attack. metaphor. makes video seem more violent than it was.
"He was our boss," Pelley said. "He covered the world, covered combat, the White House. His was a quest to open minds, not close them. If you've ever worked hard for a boss because you admired him, then you understand what we've enjoyed here." "Bill resigned Tuesday. It was hard on him and hard on us," Pelley continued, referencing his co-correspondents. "But he did it for us, and you."
quote selection. emphasizing everyones sadness at 60 minutes. showing their admiration toward bill.
Owens began his journalism career as a summer intern at CBS News in 1988, before joining 60 Minutes in 2003. In February 2019, he took on the role of executive producer, becoming the third person to run the program since it aired in 1968.
this information is more toward the top of the a rticle. this is the first article ive seen this from.
Bill made sure they were accurate and fair.
embedding a link about CBS's fairness and accuracy. this appears supportive of CBS and as if they are trying to back them. Why else would they embed this link.
implied that President Trump and his administration have had an inappropriate influence on the show.
i dont remember when they ever said "inappropriate influence" or even insinuated that
"I have worked at CBS News for 37 years, more than half of that at 60 Minutes, I have been shot at and threatened with jail for protecting a source. I have overseen more than 600 stories as Executive Producer of 60,"
intense quote highlighting his dedication to 60 minutes and his work
legacy
word choice: legacy
Owens began his career at CBS News as an intern in 1988. His many roles at the network span the assignment desk, the White House beat, where he served as senior producer, and "CBS Evening News," where he was senior broadcast producer.Owens was named executive producer of "60 Minutes" in 2019 after 12 years supervising the broadcast's content in senior roles. He is just one of three "60 Minutes" executive producers in the show's 57-year history. In recent months he also assumed the role of senior executive producer of "CBS Evening News," which took on a reimagined format in January.
inverted pyramid style. putting Owens history and success at the company at the bottom. less significant information for them to report on. it seems that in this article they just wanted to reiterate their denial of trumps lawsuit claims.
lash out
word choice. lashing out is aggressive.
In a statement
embedding their statement link. In this statement 60 Minutes denied former President Trump's claim of deceptive editing in their Kamala Harris interview, explaining that different excerpts were used for clarity and time, and reiterated their invitation for him to appear on the program.
Constitutional law experts say the lawsuit is "frivolous" and an infringement on First Amendment rights.
quote selection. "Constitutional law experts"...who exactly is that?
Wendy McMahon, the president and CEO of CBS News & Stations and CBS Media Ventures, said in an email announcing the decision that "Bill has led 60 Minutes with unwavering integrity, curiosity, and a deep commitment to the truth. He has championed the kind of journalism that informs, enlightens, and often changes the national conversation."
choosing this quote to show respect, not suspicion. this is a statement using this quote
The closer one looks at the context around Bill Owens’ departure as the executive producer of “60 Minutes,” the worse it appears.
the closer one looks in a specific way you mean. another source could have this same headline and give a completely different narrative for what "worse" means.
Why it’s so discouraging to see the executive producer of ‘60 Minutes’ resign
here let me tell you why this is sad kinda headline, let them tell you why you should be discouraged about this. let them tell you the reason of his resignation (or their percieved reason).
As for what this might’ve been in reference to, The New York Times noted, “Paramount’s controlling shareholder, Shari Redstone, is eager to secure the Trump administration’s approval for a multibillion-dollar sale of her company to Skydance, a company run by the son of the tech billionaire Larry Ellison.” (Redstone has also, of course, expressed an interest in trying to settle Trump’s civil case, despite its lack of merit.)
guessing what his quote refers to. making the narrative about shari wanting to just end the lawsuit, merge the companies, and make money. insuating thats all she cares about.
"has also, of course,..." "despite its lack of merit" msnbc saying there is lack of merit here. what does this insinuate about the case and his resignation?
longtime news magazine
word choice: "longtime" shows experience and credivbility to some. as if since its been around a long time it must be legendary.
legendary news program
clearly biased
Shortly after reports of Owens’ resignation emerged, two “60 Minutes” producers spoke anonymously with CNN’s Jake Tapper. One source called Trump’s lawsuit “baseless” and stressed Owens’ refusal to apologize or bend while noting the top producer “fought for the broadcast and for independent journalism and that cost him his job.” A second source was blunter. “It‘s like a guy who has been battling for months against an attack,” this person said. “He sacrificed himself hoping it might make our corporate overlords wake up and realize they risk destroying what makes 60 Minutes great.”
a lot of anonymous sources here
“independent decisions based on what was right for 60 Minutes.”
so in this article they keep in the last part of the sentence. fox news article cut out the last bit saying owens quit because he wanted to make "independent decisions." period and thats that. but actually the end of the quote is about making "independent decisons BASED ON WHATS BEST FOR 60 MINUTES." big information there that if you take it out it flips the narrative to look like hey bill owens quots because he cant do what he wants anymore. (trying to make him appear selfish)
“Bill made sure they were accurate and fair,”
again, CNN is chosing this quote. trying to show that CBS is fair
with Pelley adding that Owens “felt he had lost the independence that honest journalism requires.”
quote selection
abrupt
insinuates trying to get out fast. quick decision making = something was wrong --- > must be something bad at CBS right?!
one word affecting a narrative
Graham believes the true reason
what is grahams source other than his own personal belief and guess??
a conservative media watchdog
metaphor, "watchdog" as if he sees and knows everything.
Trump attorney Ed Paltzik told Fox News Digital, "CBS and Paramount committed the worst kind of election interference and fraud in the closing days of the most important presidential election in history. That the 60 Minutes boss resigned the same week as CBS settled a major discrimination claim is even further proof of their reckless disregard for truth and the law. President Trump will pursue this vital matter to its just and rightful conclusion." That settlement involved a lawsuit brought by a script coordinator who alleged he was passed over for a writing job on the CBS program "SEAL Team" because of the network's DEI policies.
flipping this narrative into an accusation and proof to something bill owens didnt step down for. he stepped down to show his disinterest with external corporation supervising him and controlling what he can report on.
claiming he could no longer make independent decisions at CBS
They keep using, "independent decisions" insinuating that he made all the decisions by himself.
newsroom drama.
Reducing the whole situation to drama.
On Tuesday, Owens told colleagues he's removing himself from the newsroom drama.
"Newsroom Drama" denotates the significance of his resignation.
"This war against the fourth estate journalists is of this piece," Tapper said.
war metaphor.
Tapper said, continuing to quote from the source.
anonymous again?
"'It's clear now, in a quest to sell the company, Shari Redstone and others will bow to presidential pressure,'" Tapper said, quoting from a "60 Minutes" source who spoke to CNN.
Anonymous source right here. We don't actually know if this information is true and who exactly it came from.
the game of cat-and-mouse gets turned on its head.
I am not sure how I feel about using this metaphor in this article. This aspects of this situation are mre than just a "game of cat and mouse."
Fear has a firm grip on immigrant communities
This is a strong metaphor used to describe the intensity immigrant communities are dealing with.
the deportation program’s larger hope is to
This line here is personification. It is making the program as a whole be able to hope as one.
Raid or rumor? Reports of immigrations sweeps are warping life in California’s Central Valley
"Warping life" and "sweeping", are both metaphors in this title. I do not think these metaphors are appropriate of rate context of this article. I think this because these metaphors don't recognize the gravity of this situation. People are being relocated, and they are using swift metaphors like "sweeping" to put what's happening nonchalantly.
they never were able to get over the finish line.
This quote helps truly encapsulate what this coaches finale looked like in the eyes of the fans. I don't know anything about this team but the structure of this shows me that this article was made for fans who loved their coach but also maybe thought he never fully got the job done.
Dissecting
Dissecting as in they are taking a look into every detail. I don't see anything wrong with this metaphor and I actually think it is helpful in trying to get off the point of the article.
when a volcano eruption in Iceland sent ash miles into the sky and obstructed travel for millions, including at Heathrow.
I like how they embed links for readers to understand more about what they article is about. They are trying to provide as much information as possible. This builds credibility.
A correction was made on March 22, 2025: An earlier version of this article misstated the kind of equipment that Heathrow’s chief executive said had worked as expected on Friday. It was backup generators, not a backup transformer.
Want to stay updated on what’s happening in the United Kingdom and New Jersey? Sign up for Your Places: Global Update, and we’ll send our latest coverage to your inbox.
Seeing that they are already providing a link to sign up for local based articles shows me how expansive The New York Times is. To me, the more journalists covering media in different places the better.
Last month, just over a year after his brush with death, Coates and his girlfriend visited Dr. Fajgenbaum in Philadelphia to thank him for his help. A smiling Coates was the picture of health; he had put on muscle since the last time he met the doctor.
I am happy this happened to him and AI was terrific in his case. However, I feel that this article is forgetting about all of the other cases where this doesn't work. These are only told stories because they worked, whereas, the rest that don't work go untold. Because that is not news, and people will not read about it.
“If you use A.I. to come up with a new drug, you can make lots and lots of money off that new drug. If you use A.I. to find a new use for an old, inexpensive drug, no one makes any money off of it,” Dr. Fajgenbaum said.
Coming down to money.
The alcohol “popped to the top of our list,” Dr. Might said, and “it worked instantly.”
They are omitting the part about the risks of testing new medications on people. AI isn't all knowing and it might not provide all of the risk factors. This article is shining a positive light on AI rather than acknowledging all the factors and risks of it. It can be a wonderful tool; however, it needs to be used and recognized with caution. People who read an article like this might think that if they ask AI about their health conditions, then they can listen to it and do what it says without precaution.
Finding Clues in Old Research
This whole section feels like a shameless plug for Dr. Fajgenbaum.
led researchers to ask
What researchers?
In labs around the world, scientists are using A.I. to search among existing medicines for treatments that work for rare diseases. Drug repurposing, as it’s called, is not new, but the use of machine learning is speeding up the process — and could expand the treatment possibilities for people with rare diseases and few options.
This is a relevant matter. AI is becoming more popular by the day, and this shows how it can be used in modern science today. People are interested in the power of AI; therefore, this article would intrigue them and persuade them to click on it.