36 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2020
    1. posthumanist exploration of the deep and growing entanglements between the worlds of people and of things in robotics and artificial intelligence;

      This reminds me of Chiang's The Lifecycle of Software Objects.

    2. To care for something (an animal, a child, a sick relative, or a technological system) is to bear and affirm a moral relation to

      I like this explanation of what it means to care. I find it very helpful.

    3. he Internet grew by breaking, bumping up against the limits of existing protocols and practices and work-ing around them, leaving behind almost by accident some of the proper-ties that we now enumerate as key and distinctive virtues of the Internet as an infrastructural form.

      This reminds me again of glitch theory, the notion that things breaking reveals the capacity of that system to work in unexpected ways.

    4. To repurpose Tolstoy “All working technologies are alike. All broken technologies are broken in their own way.

      I love the idea of looking at methods of repair as indicative of a culture or social values. This would be a fun subject to explore anthropologically.

    5. some are more on the receiving end of globalization than others

      This reminds me the article Bridget reviewed a few weeks ago. The Global South is responsible for innovating/upcycling old tech with very little pay-off.

    1. In the process it has also, and most visibly, purchased narratives of wildlife preservation, sustainable development, and female entrepreneurship (Riordan, 2015).

      I'm critical of the capital-seeking corporation masquerading as an empathetic, philanthropic investors, but at the same time, I think I would rather them pretend to have a consciousness than blatantly ruin the world. Do you all agree?

    2. Like cloud servers, carbon sequestration projects can have many different configurations and can be located anywhere in the world; the carbon cycle largely operates at a global scale without regard to the specificities of place.

      It's helpful to know that Microsoft's remote carbon offsetting efforts can impact the world regardless of where they're taking place.

    3. Carbon neutrality, drawing on the logic of double-entry bookkeeping to negate the contents of one column with the contents of another, was therefore a strategy far more appropriate to the cloud’s material demands

      Again, this seems like a very shady practice. Even the term "double-entry bookkeeping" sounds like a sleazeball in the back of a club fudging numbers.

    4. Virginia in fact had to compete with several other prospective states to secure Microsoft’s tenure, offering a comprehensive package of incentives including state-subsidized fiber, millions of dollars in grants, an exemption on sales tax, and a 90% cut from its property taxes for 20 years

      Similar to Kate's point in the next sentence -- I think it's interesting how the state is able to offer 'discounts' on property taxes, sales tax, and fiber to a corporation in order present itself as an appealing site for investment. That's a very questionable transaction between government and corporation, one that reveals how malleable laws can be.

    5. Since 2012, Microsoft’s operations are made carbon neutral through a company-wide carbon fee to fund renewable energy and offset purchases

      Wow! That's pretty deceptive. I had assumed that carbon neutral companies made efforts to curb their own carbon production (in addition to funding renewable energy.) I heard recently that Microsoft announced plans to become carbon negative, but I am critical of how that would manifest within the company.

  2. Mar 2020
    1. f electronics companies were responsible both for what goes into machines and for their eventual take-back and recycling, then they might possibly begin to find it effective to make these devices less toxic at the outset.

      There's definitely a lack of accountability here.

    2. Waste reveals the economies of value within digital technology that render valueless, for instance, a computer that is more than three years old. This collapse in value demonstrates assumptions within electronics—based on duration, novelty, and consistent consumption—that might otherwise go unno-ticed, if it were not for the now-looming rubbish pile.

      Glitch reveals the capacities of the system; waste reveals the values of the system?

    3. The ambiguity of determining when waste definitively becomes waste points to its role as a dynamic category. Waste oscillates in relation to ordering systems and structures of value.

      I like this! Some people might think that the plastic bags given out at stores are waste, but I reuse them as trash bags because I see buying new plastic to put trash in as more wasteful. At least the plastic bag I got from the store has now served two purposes, right?

    4. outmoded commodities “release” the imaginary and wishful dimensions that made them so compelling when first distributed as novel objects.

      So, another by-product of electronics is the desire that we initially had for it, which we set aside to make way for the desire of a new product?

    5. Discussing these “things” involves being able to register the complex forces that bring them “into material-semiotic being.”

      Not only microchip-making, but also meaning-making.

    6. astes related to electronics give rise to entirely new categories of waste classification and ways of regulating waste

      New tech means new trash, and waste management systems must adapt to this need.

    7. Recycling, moreover, often involves the shipping of electronics for salvage to countries with cheap labor and lax environmental laws.

      Here, Gabrys' alludes to globalization, an updated form of colonization perpetrated by corporations, which we can consider as an additional process that produces waste.

    8. These processes of pollution, remainder, and decay reveal other orders of materiality that have yet to enter the sense of the digital. Here are spaces and processes that exceed the limited trans-fer of information through hardware and software. Yet these spaces and processes are often lost somewhere between the apparent “virtuality” of information, the increasingly miniature scale of electronics, and the remoteness of electronic manufacture and disposal. It

      The by-products of technology reveal the glitch in our limited understanding of the relationship between virtual and physical. Our tendency to forget the physicality of our technology is a glitch in itself.

  3. Feb 2020
    1. hat the anesthesia she had been given was insufficient. But assembly lines don't stop because the product on them has a complaint. Her doctor whistled, and assured her she was all right, and carried the procedure through to the horrific end. Imani fainted some seconds before that.

      The process of getting an abortion is now out of a woman's hands in that the institution (influenced by dominant culture) controls all aspects of the process to the detriment/exclusion of the woman's needs, as evidenced by Imani not receiving enough anesthesia.

      Legalized mean its controlled by patriarchal institution.

    1. language (in the broader social or discursive sense) creates cate-gorical reality rather than the other way around. The methodologicalconsequence is to render suspect both the process of categorization itselfand any research that is based on such categorization, because it inevitablyleads to demarcation, and demarcation to exclusion, and exclusion toinequality

      Language creates categories; it does not describe them.

    2. That is, sincesymbolic violence and material inequalities are rooted in relationships thatare defined by race, class, sexuality, and gender, the project of decon-structing the normative assumptions of these categories contributes to thepossibility of positive social change

      Anticategorical complexity deconstructs the categories that the dominant culture perpetuates, which makes way for the possibility of social change.

    3. intracategorical complexitybecause authors working inthis vein tend to focus on particular social groups at neglected points ofintersection—“people whose identity crosses the boundaries of tradition-ally constructed groups” (Dill 2002, 5)—in order to reveal the complexityof lived experience within such groups.

      Intracategorical complexity is a methodology that falls between intercategorical complexity and anticategorical complexity. It analyzes the groups that are overlooked at intersections of being.

    4. intercategorical complexity, requiresthat scholars provisionally adopt existing analytical categories to documentrelationships of inequality among social groups and changing configura-tions of inequality along multiple and conflicting dimension

      Intercategorical complexity is a methodology that uses categories provisionally to make a point about inequalities within groups.

    5. anticategorical complexitybecause it is based on amethodology that deconstructs analytical categories

      Anticategorical complexity is a methodology that deconstructs analytical categories because it acknowledges that these categories are multiple, fluid, and changing, and therefore defy a category in themselves.

    1. dL;wcNXJhS5^w;n\;^N;X7;wZ?w56hc;w5X:wkhSX;^56NSNdo

      This reminds me of the Tolentino piece in which she remarks on how we must share our experiences in order to validate any sympathy we extend to others in their times of distress.

    1. crime

      This also reflects the way rape cases have historically been processed in our court system -- a sentence of some small amount of months or years with the opportunity for parole. Ultimately, it's a temporary, easily circumvented punishment.

    2. the tone of exu’s response made sense only in the buzzing, dissonant gap between them.

      a third space existing between virtual and real, connected to and separate from those spaces.

    1. In otherwords, there is an incessant definition and redefinition of what, on the onehand, makes a good computation, a good object, and a good process, and onthe other hand, what is defined as irresponsible and potentially a bad objector process. However,asnoted earlier,the material and expressive boundariesof these definitions are not at all clear.Wemay, in this light, therefore sug-gest that such turbulent objects are considered as standard objects of net-work culture.54

      The authors make it clear they won't be evaluating anomalous objects in terms of morality, but the frequency with which they return to morality in this introduction makes me wonder what attributes align with "good" objects and what with "bad" objects. Is it usefulness? Is it the way the object is delivered to us? Is it the intention of the person who created it?

    2. The uncontrollable and uncensorable flood of damaging information is stillgrasped as more dangerous than the impact of firearms

      The implication is that the possible degradation of morality that comes with access to information is more dangerous than guns, correct? Do we agree with this? What does that imply about how our culture views morality, life, and death?

    3. cut price Viagra?

      Jim mentioned last week that we rarely encounter spam anymore -- just the occasional phishing attempt. At my last job, though, I received a TON of Viagra spam in my work email. It was particularly weird because I worked at a college.

  4. Jan 2020
    1. First, the internet is experienced completely differently by people who are visibly identifiable as a marginalized race or gender. It’s a nastier, more exhausting internet, one that gets even nastier and even more exhausting as intersections stack up.

      In the same way the bodies of marginalized peoples are politicized in real life, the presentation of one's intersectionality online makes them vulnerable to the same harassment. We have the opportunity to present ourselves differently online. How do we reconcile protecting identities/hiding parts of ourselves/presenting ourselves differently with perpetuating systems that benefit the white male majority?