36 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2022
    1. The students responded with surprise thatother people, professional adults, would actuallylend their voice of support for the project.

      More students need to physically hear that some adults are on their side and will support them.

    2. 3. Rigorous Aligned High- Quality Instruction4. High Expectations and Success for All

      I really appreciate the attention being brought onto rigor and high expectations. I feel that sometimes instructors practice restoration policies in a way where they expect the bare minimum from students.

    3. “experience transfor-mative learning that changes their lives and opensdoors of personal, academic, and civic opportunity”(Mirra et al. 2).

      And what better place to practice this than in a school environment.

    4. “Why are they trying to sweep us like we’regarbage?”

      This is interesting. I never thought about the connotative meaning of hallway "sweeps." In our school we still implement these simply to try and get students to class.

    1. Spatial justice can be understood as being premised onthe idea that “justice, however it might be defined, hasa consequential geography, a spatial expression that ismore than just a background reflection or set of physicalattributes to be descriptively mapped” (

      I can see this totally relating to how schooling is founded in Chicago. It always seemed crazy to me how different your schooling experience, school choices, and school funding is dependent on where you live...to the point where people feel obligated to lie about their address.

    2. Kara addressed the foodindustry and obesity through a critical lens examiningrace, power, and place

      Yes! This reminds me of project that I did during my undergrad years at UIC where we examined food deserts.

    3. Throughout this unit, Kara asked her students to makeuse of their knowledge of their own neighborhoods,positioning them as experts about the places theyinhabit.

      Yes, students are experts in their own field and we can learn from the multitude of literacies they bring into the classroom.

    4. “A lot of [my students]think people are obese because people can’t put down afork . . . [In this unit] we do research about things likegenetics . . . [to counter that notion].” In addition to theinformation about the availability of healthy food in theircommunities, this challenged the idea that obese and/oroverweight people are just lazy: they may be respondingto larger forces outside their control.

      Such a powerful idea to instill in students. Often time, especially with marginalized students, they are often told that they have the ultimate control over everything (they choose to fail, they choose to be poor, they choose to continue the cycle of violence, they continue to be addicts) when in reality there are complex systems of power working to make sure students don't succeed. I think this study goes beyond obesity and BMIs, it teaches students to be critical of the systems they live in.

    1. Persistent societal images that negatively por-tray Black women and girls have contributed tonormalcy and the mosaic of Whiteness as pure andinnocent while Blackness is seen as inhumane orrepresenting death.

      This is an interesting take on how cannon literature portrays white characters vs black women characters. I remember reading an article that examines the whiteness of the fantasy genre and it had a very similar critique that these authors are mentioning.

    2. Black girls are still experiencing slav-ery through more modernized weaponry that hasadvanced beyond shackles and chains.

      Yes! Whenever people discuss racism, especially those that argue for a color-blind or neutral stand on it, I feel like they fail to mention how complex systemic racism is. Yes, outwardly calling an individual racial slurs is a manifestation of racism BUT "modernized weaponry" for racism is a lot more subtle. Like for example, the lack of black girl characters in literature OR the devaluing of BIPOC stories.

    3. . When the only images that Blackgirls see of themselves in the classroom are rootedin their dehumanization, it sends messages of dis-affirmation and educational neglect that may neverbe emancipated

      Again talking about the modern weaponry of systemic racism...this is one subtle but powerful consequence of modern day slavery.

    4. Therefore, if students are never presented with pos-itive visions of their own lived experiences in thestories they read, there is a need for them to createtheir own stories through the use of counternarra-tives in writing instruction

      Yes! Allow students to reclaim and retell their own narratives!

    1. “Education is the great equalizerin a democratic society, and if people are not given access to a quality education,then what we are doing is creating an underclass of people who will challenge ourvery way of life”

      Yes! I totally agree with this. I know a lot of people both outside and inside of education critique this quote and I understand why. However, I do genuinely believe that an education based on critical literacy, where students, know how to read the world is a powerful one. Public education changed my life not only figuratively but literally.

    2. Additionally, we are also aware that public education has not lived up to its fullpotential—as a great equalizer, a leveler of the playing field—for the very peoplewho need it the most.

      Yes! A very valid critique and realistic way to look at our educational system as it currently stand. I would not be helpful or progressive if we ignore the elephant in the room.

    3. (1) interrogate their racial-ized experiences inside and outside school, and (2) produce counternarratives topopular assumptions about Black youth from low-income urban communities

      This is a very interesting way to look at and analyze literacy in the real world or outside of the classroom.

    4. In addition to viewingliteracy as cultural, as critical, and as a social practice, Neuman and Rao (2004)contend that “literacy also involves engaging with and creating a range of texts,building on the languages, experiences, cultures, and other assets of students, andcommunicating and expressing understanding in multiple ways” (p. 7). This typeof communication happens individually and with other people.

      Yes! I totally back up and will push content based skills. Yes, students should know the fundamental skills of knowing how to read. However, these should be reenforced and utilized to critically examine the power structures they are faced with.

    1. Critical Indigenous literacy forefronts the his-torically marginalized treatment of Native stories—and by extension, Native people

      This is totally important. I always think about the ways that literature can be intersectional. By studying how Indigenous individuals reclaim and critique mainstream narratives of their community, non-indigenous folk can better understand what appropriate and uplifting representation of this community looks like.

    2. This difference in howNative and Christian creation stories are treatedprivileges Christianity, perpetuating institutional-ized racism that keeps in place the ideologies of asociety that is predominantly Christian.

      I think it goes to say that most people reading this article will know/recognize the story of Noah and the story of Genesis even if they themselves are not a devout Christian. This shows just how mainstream and normalized these stories are. While on the opposite end, unless you yourself are are indigenous or well versed in indigenous literature you probably don't know about "The story of the Milky Way" or "Beaver Steals Fire."

    3. Choose books that are tribally specific.

      I didn't realize that most people group native literature as one whole genre...even though there is a lot of diversity among tribes.

    4. Use present tense verbs to talk about NativeNations.

      Such a simple change but it can be so impactful!

    1. rhetorical violence

      I like this word choice. It really captures what this article is going for.

    2. t is the oppressive and symbolically violent use ofthe essentials of our discipline—words, rhetoric, and modes of communica-tion—that sticks to us most in the ongoing aftermath of the election (

      Yes! I often teach a rhetoric unit to our students. Inevitably, we have to talk about or discuss a speech given by Donald Trump. I often share one of his speeches not to polarize or trigger my students but to get them to see how powerful rhetoric can be...up to the point where a whole nation elects a nonsensical man to be president.

    3. English educators need support in addressing the emotional dimensions ofteaching and learning in punctual moments like these, but also in the dayto day of classroom routines and relationships.

      And English classrooms can be powerful sites of healing!

    4. When absentin teacher education programs and national policies, it is little wonder thatmany English teachers may be both stymied and fearful about addressing thecivic, healing needs of classrooms.

      While sometimes it is difficult to discuss these topics, it is still essential that we do.

    1. Many of the headlines in the media describedthe killers as “quiet,” “smart,” “nice,” and “typical American Boy[s].”

      This paragraph and this statement puts perfectly into words the way I feel about school shooters.

    2. instead of examining the systemicracist violence against Black people

      Again, mainstream media and social media often posits these issues as simple moments rather than complex systems of inequity.

    3. For us, Houck’s comment captures the critical role that mainstreammedia play in the “debasement of Black humanity, utter indifference toBlack suffering, and the denial of Black people’s right to exist” (Jefferies,2014)

      This reminds me of a unit that I am currently teaching on civil responsibility. Our central text is Elie Wiesel's memoir night. A major theme of his novel was that he did not blame the Nazis that were in the concentration camps individually, rather he placed both blame and shared a warning that indifference and dehumanization were the real culprits. Just like this comment by ridding black people of their humanity, having indifference toward their suffering, and denying their rights leads to incidents like this one.

    4. Hill’s tweet problematizes media perspec-tives such as Houck’s that fail to acknowledge theintersections of race and police brutality, especially when it comes to Blackyouth.

      Failing to acknowledge the intersections of race and other events is what leads to media representation that focuses or poses issues as black or weight. It is time for media and society at large to stop using color blind theories to examine injustices.

    1. hat becomes radical isthe refusal of the dominant narratives thatsuggest that young people, especially urbanyouth, are not writers and the creation ofspaces, both within and beyond schoolcurricula, that supportyouth literacies.

      I like the use of the word "radical" here because it shifts the problem off of the students and onto the structures of power that radicalized their writing experience.

    2. cultivate spaces for students to write with theunderstanding that they come to us already writing.

      This is something I can do. Often when reading articles about social justice in education I tend to get overwhelmed and feel like I don't know where to start. However, this is something that I can realistically implement in my classroom.

    3. I knew that the commonlyheld view of Black children as nonwriters and nonreaderswho were disengaged from learning was false.

      Totally false! It is frustrating how society focuses on the students and blames them on an individual level...yet ignore the systematic racisms that are embedded in our society and educational systems.

    4. Her statementis significant because it acknowledges thatthere are some writing practices that areexpected, valued, and legitimized in schoolcontexts, while there are others that remaininvisible and are deemed less important.

      This is an example of tough choices we need to make in the classroom. I for one always teach the 5 paragraph argumentative essay, not because I'm particularly a fan of this type of essay but because it is what the English department aligns on. I often cut out creative writing because it is not seen as "acceptable" or rigorous enough.

    1. a critical literacy thatequips students to “read” power relationships at thesame time it imparts academic skills.

      I think having a balance between both social justice and critical academic skills is important. I feel like in this day in age it is either one of the other; either you care solely about social justice or solely about academic skills. Personally, I'm in the middle of this spectrum. I do believe that teaching social justice is important and critical but I also understand in order to navigate real world power dynamics you have to a set of foundational cognitive skills at your dispense.

    2. . But asteachers, we have more academic space than we inhabit.We can choose to push back against the disadvantagednarratives and mandates that continue to lurk in ourschools and society and instead build a curriculum thatputs students’ lives at the center and encourages them toresist a story line that distorts or maligns their right toblossom into the intellectuals and change-makers theyare so ready to become

      As teachers we have a responsibility to teach skills that will help students move beyond the classroom space. Part of our job as experts in literature is to ensure that our students are able to read the world.

    3. bring in students’ lives in two ways.

      Making class content related to the students is always a sure fire way to make it engaging. If it is not engaging then we, as educators, might need to reflect on what we can do or why it isn't engaging.

    4. invisible hierarchyof Standard English

      Try as we might it is important to really understand that this hierarchy will not go away. I think we need to teach student Standard English not because it is a better language, but because navigating through power relationships requires knowledge about Standard English.