Happy denouement of the history of Mr. Oldbuck
Fancy way of saying "the end."
Happy denouement of the history of Mr. Oldbuck
Fancy way of saying "the end."
recaptures the beloved one.
She doesn't look too happy about any of this
Mr. Oldbuck politely takes leave of them
The way the author uses language to increase the situational humor throughout this is great
pushes the monks into the hole, and throws the earth upon them.
He is a very violent man
passes his ladye-love off as a sack of flour.
She isn't treated with much respect throughout any of this story
On awaking
How did she sleep through all of that?
mounts the beloved one fast asleep on his donkey, and carries her off during Mr. Oldbuck's nap.
This poor woman keeps getting kidnapped
The rival continues his aquatic amusement.
The humor in repeating this is great. I love the juxtaposition of what the rival is doing vs what Oldbuck and ladye are doing
Mr. Oldbuck conceals his beloved in a close carriage, with locked door to prevent every danger.
Sounds a little like kidnapping
dreadfully frightened to see it ascend the chimney.
At least the dog can eat now
discovers his emaciated dog.
This poor dog!!! :(
He turns over a new leaf.
It's funny how the same image is used every time he "turns over a new leaf"
Mr. 0ldbuck amuses himself by drowning the porter who had pursued them.
Mr. Oldbuck has a sick sense of humor
n which it has lain a fortnight.
This guy really shouldn't own animals...
habiliments
I had to look this up - apparently it's another word for clothing
Mr. Oldbuck is imprisoned for midnight rioting
Mr. Oldbuck is a party animal
Mr. Oldbuck is thrown.
This guy can't catch a break
nearly strangles himself.
The ironic twist of trying to kill himself and then almost accidentally dying comes up a lot
His beloved one leaves him-unhappy wretch!
Maybe he should just find someone who actually likes him???
dying
The use and exaggeration of the phrase "dying of hunger" creates a comical irony within this scene. He tries to kill himself and then wakes up "dying of hunger."
He receives no reply to his letter
It doesn't seem like she's too interested. Maybe he should cut his losses
but she has vanished
I sense a recurring theme happening here
Drawings
The stylistic way in which the images are drawn seem almost unsettling. It reminds me a bit of the original drawings from Alice in Wonderland - exaggerated features, grimaces, etc. I think it adds to the dark humor of the comics.
Three things are postulated here: a determination of the work by the outside world (by race, then by history), a consecution of works among themselves, and an allocation of the work to its author.
Barthe believes that determination, consecution, and allocation are all related to one another within the realm of a text.
reading in the sense of consuming is not playing with the text.
This states that reading and writing must be done simultaneously within a text - reading on it's own is not effective enough; texts must be critiqued and analyzed as well.
that is a choice whose price we cannot avoid.
nicely said
Can we imagine an app that “measures” whether one is really in love with someone else? Or an app that compares how one’s processes of creativity hold up against established measures of creative inspiration? How about an app that compares the “depth” of one’s grieving for a loved one against others’ grief?
We would most definitely find this to be unethical.
But it can be free if it comes to grasp such processes as its own – related to its goals and not those of others.
Comparably, we cannot be completely free if we are being monitored by the goals of internet security
freedom is impossible without the self having some space of autonomy where it can be in a reflective relation with itself.
basically, there is no chance at freedom if we are being monitored all the time
… freedom is this: to be with oneself in the other.
a lot of great quotes in this article - I really like this one as well
… not merely by the fact that someone is reading my emails but also by the fact that someone has the power to do so should they choose … leaves us at the mercy of arbitrary power … What is offensive to liberty is the very existence of such arbitrary power.
It is a scary thought that internet security have the power to do whatever they want at any possible moment.
A helpful spy behind the dashboard is a young driver’s new best friend.
Another very powerful quote.
It’s puzzling we are not already more angry about this transformation. We never liked mass surveillance in its historic forms.
True - we never liked it in the past so why do we tolerate it now?
The primary business model of the internet is built on mass surveillance.
Another great quote.
it is as if the social itself has become the new target of capitalism’s expansion.
Anyone who partakes in social media is a potential victim to this.
For more than a decade now, the difficulty of targeting messages at particular consumers online has driven advertisers to reach audiences through the continuous tracking of individuals, wherever they are online.
Makes you feel a little uneasy when you think about it that way.
… the centrality of corporate power is a direct reality at the very heart of the digital age.
powerful quote
if every point in space-time is connectable to every other, then it is susceptible to monitoring from every other.
Develops an interesting parallel - we are able to connect with each other as we please but also means we will be monitored in everything we do.
Surveillance capitalism only became possible through the development of the internet. While the internet is often credited with bringing freedom, its most important feature is connection, not freedom.
True - the internet provides the exact opposite of freedom. It provides surveillance in everything we do.
Some see this as a new “surveillance capitalism”. This is focused on data extraction rather than the production of new goods, thus generating intense concentrations of power over extraction and threatening core values such as freedom.
Interesting term - never heard of it.
Yet this, in crude outline, is the world we are being asked to celebrate today.
A perspective we never usually think of...
Devaluation means employees in this role don’t get the resources they need — particularly company money — to experiment and test new technologies that could actually bring the company’s social and digital presence to new heights.
This is terrible - employees aren't getting the resources they need simply because their careers aren't seen as important as others.
Even the New York Times has an audience development strategy (read: lots of focus on social media).
Demonstrates how social media conduct is prominent everywhere.
It’s a real job. And it deserves its place and respect at tech networking events, conventions, and roundtables.
Agreed - especially as social media becomes more and more popular each year.
But they’re still analytical as fuck, with a measure of art in there.
Going back to how tech and art coincide with one another
Track video retention rates. Track engagement numbers. Track the velocity of video view counts, constantly refreshing pages while tracking several additional key metrics across multiple other platforms. Figure out what part of the data is white noise and what indicates that the content is receiving the optimal amount of exposure, watch time or attention minutes, and engagement. Learn and manage a variety of technologies and analytic tools. Monitor Facebook trends and pitch content to create based on what is going to ride the trending wave. Write each and every single Facebook share text, Tweet, and any other social media post — and make sure every word of it is genuine. Learn the language of viral momentum and how it varies from platform to platform. Monitor comment sections. Respond to messages from fans, leveraging them for crowdsourced ideas and aggregating their critiques and fact-checks to bring back to producers. Collaborate with other employees of the organization, including sales — because driving traffic to sponsors’ content is key — and IT, because you are the first and primary interface with customers and users. Become the primary point of contact with other organizations with whom to coordinate traffic swaps or content collaborations. Create community, develop an audience, and develop trust — but don’t ever neglect the data.
It seems as if there is a lot more that goes into social media than what we give media workers credit for
In the eyes of others, those skills would have worth.
It is sad that some skills are seen in higher regard than others.
the whole art/tech paradigm fell apart.
In many professions, art and tech are one in the same.
I pushed away the insecurity I felt at probably being “unable” to do anything technical by reminding myself that it was okay: I was meant to be doing something else.
I can relate to this as someone who is technologically challenged myself, but this is also not a great outlook to have since technology is quickly becoming a highly predominant part of our lives
I had no shortage of people telling me I was going to be a starving writer, or that I wasted my collegiate experience learning “useless” skills.
I feel that
I quickly caught onto one of their personal memes: “The social media intern.”
It is sad that interns such as these are looked down upon since social media is a vastly growing platform in this day and age
Spec-fic tells us stories about our lives with our creations.
Another engrossing way of describing the genre - I feel as if it were explained this way to a reader they would be much more inclined to want to read it.
As to my definition of spec-fic, I describe it as a set of literatures that examine the effects on humans and human societies of the fact that we are toolmakers.
I like this definition - makes the genre sound intriguing to a prospective reader.
Midnight Robber is similarly syncretic, infusing allusions to Haitian culture and references to Yoruba spirituality, Jamaican revolutionaries, and Trinidadian carnival into science fiction mainstays such as alternative dimensions and artificial intelligence.
Sounds really interesting! Makes me excited to finish the novel.
Hopkinson received the John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer in 1999 and has also been nominated for several other prestigious awards for writers of speculative fiction,
very impressive
that we, the viewer, have a role in making the world we see on screen.
I really like this quote - I feel as if it's especially relevant since it can be compared to any other piece of work as well, it's not just solely focused to film
One of the beautiful things about filmmaking is the dialectic it creates between filmmakers and audiences to create jointly the universe being seen.
True - the way one person interprets a piece of work is completely different from the next
Finn was trained to do at least one other thing: work in sanitation, which gave him the inside scoop on how to take down the Death Star planet. This is some intergalactic peak blackness right here: it was black sanitation workers in Memphis in 1968 who were so close to the heart of oppression that none other than Martin Luther King Jr thought they were key to taking down a system of death, too.
Strong connection to the different types of sanitation workers (in the movie and in black history)
he was taken “from a family I’ll never know” and “raised to do one thing”
Another strong reference to slavery and slave trade
doesn’t “care what colour he is. No droid is that important”
Interesting reference to color - strongly helps argument
The only people we see ordering the stormtroopers (who are all named with dehumanising numbers) throughout the Force Awakens are white officers
Comparing the storm trooper leaders to slave owners - powerful take
maybe it’s more comparable to Muhammad Ali or Malcolm X,
More great comparisons
calls his new friend Finn (suspiciously evocative of Mark Twain’s Huck Finn)
I like this comparison of a pop culture movie to literature - enhances argument in my opinion
This is not unlike the experience of the first humans we see in human history, who were African and who were later shipped to be similarly violently exploited for labour
Good way of incorporating this parallel to history
the first human forms we see in The Force Awakens are those of the stormtroopers, who are moved in tightly packed ships and dispatched to commit genocide against a noncompliant population.
I really like this comparison to US history - most people probably wouldn't think twice of this scene but compared to the history of black oppression and slavery, it makes it much more powerful.
it could be read as the first science fiction film of the Black Lives Matter era.
I've never seen the movie but seems like an interesting argument to make. Wouldn't necessarily agree that this is done intentionally (it is a Disney movie after all) but it is an interesting read on a popular film.
what if under every white stormtrooper’s armour was a black human?
I find this a very effective way of beginning the article and bringing the issue to the surface in a creative way
if students learn something, it has to be on their own initiatives
Let the students decide what kind of students they want to be - what they decide to learn, the quality of work they want to submit, etc.
By largely removing the grade from my judgment, I’m forcing students to make choices about what matters to them and why.
Gives students the power to decide what grade they ultimately want to receive.
success is largely a function of conforming to the values of the system (many of which are opaque and approached tactically)
Another main problem in traditional grading scales - grades can be biased and hard to determine
By establishing a level of “proficiency,” I was forced to define the two or three most important criteria to that determination.
A proficiency scale is interesting in that a few key points can be used to determine what makes a piece "proficient" or not, rather than determining an overall grade.
much more of my commentary can go to diagnosing the problem in the student’s writing process and focusing the commentary where it might be most helpful.
This is the most important part of getting feedback anyway, in my opinion.
putting control of the grade firmly in students’ hands.
gives students control of what grade they want to get - interesting tactic
thoroughly conditioned to only care about that number anyway.
the problem with traditional grading scales
Most of them claim that their students produce higher-quality work, pay more attention to feedback, feel more responsible for their grades and are less grade anxious and less likely to protest their grades.
Seems like a successful process!
You can adopt one or two of the three elements, or apply an element in some cases and not others.
Allows the professor to be much more flexible when grading.
less grade anxiety.
very important!
By choosing the bundle they want to complete, students select the final grade they want to earn,
I like how this gives the students the power to choose the work they want to do. Might even make it more enjoyable for the student if they make the decision on what bundle they want.
At the beginning of the term, you give your students one, two or three virtual tokens
Interesting tactic - sounds like it would be an effective way to allow students a second chance on a missed assignment or rewarding those who consistently turn in quality work on time.
buffers the riskiness of no partial credit and allows the opportunity for redemption.
good way of allowing students to redeem themselves
this kind of assignment grading increases student motivation and produces higher-quality work than traditional grading systems do.
Sounds like an efficient grading system - excited to be in a class this semester that practices a system such as this.
You can specify basic parameters for creative assignments and not worry about “grading” them.
Great concept - interesting way of incorporating creativity into a grading scale that isn't as conventional as a formulaic scale.
Most employers of our graduates give grades little heed in hiring.
This is a very important issue today as many graduates are finding it difficult to find employment after graduation. We give so much thought into the grades we get which ultimately do not matter once we graduate - all that matters is the degree and experiential learning.
works of comparable quality, even though they differ a great deal
This is an interesting point - works can vary greatly but are given the same letter grade.
the importance having the space and safety and security (financially well before technologically) to think and write and be.
A very important topic.
But you’re free… You’re free from owning.
But owning is not always a bad thing. Could be a topic for debate.
What do you own? Your degree? Your ideas? Your work? Are you sure?
Interesting concept - do we really "own" anything?
What does it mean, both literally and figuratively, to have a room of one’s own?
Figuratively, this metaphor can be taken in many different directions. A room of one's own is a form of freedom, of self-reflection, but it is also a form of isolation - a room, like a personal domain, is uniquely ours, but doesn't allow much in the form of communication with others. This could be delved into much deeper, and I believe can be taken in both positive and negative directions (although I personally believe personal domains are an excellent idea for students.)
and we must consider both the financial burden and the transaction mechanism of a push for domains in education
It is my understanding that personal domains for students isn't a common occurrence throughout universities either. While it is a great idea, it was an initiative that I didn't even know UMW had until now.
any notion of “ownership” that we might have based on physical property does not necessarily extend to the digital.
It is a strange concept to think about, how the things that are "ours" online are technically not ours at all as they would be if they were physical objects.
We share, we like, and we retweet.
It is interesting to think of this as "work," which is usually viewed as a burden, when these are all things we do voluntarily in our spare time.