happy movie or a neutral movie, and then you are given the opportunity to help the researcher out by staying longer and participating in another study.
This would be an interesting way of testing out my own hypothesis
happy movie or a neutral movie, and then you are given the opportunity to help the researcher out by staying longer and participating in another study.
This would be an interesting way of testing out my own hypothesis
but their concern for what these other people might be thinking about them overpowered their desire to do the right thing.
From societal pressures to be right and "perfect"
and lifestyles also reflect to some degree the attitudes of the people we interact with. Similarly, decisions about behaviors such as smoking and drinking are influenced by whether the people we spend time with engage in these activities.
This is obvious because a lot of people's views and beliefs are, generally speaking, reflective of where they are from.
“prosocial personality.”
Would this be someone who is less inclined to be a bystander?
. But some situations are ambiguous, and potential helpers may have to decide whether a situation is one in which help, in fact, needs to be given.
Bystander must think about how much their help is needed and if it even is
only one man checked his status, but many others simply glanced at the scene and continued on their way.
I couldn't even imagine this happening!
while onlookers typically fail to intervene.
I feel like this is a popular "skit" to do in the media currently as well.
factors need to be considered by those who might help.
Does identity ever play a role for both the victim and non-bystander?
people just don’t exert as much effort when working on a collective endeavor,
is this because they can rely on others to take the load off of them completely
he confirmed that children performed slightly better when they played the game in pairs compared to when they played alone
Do people in competitive environments feel happier?
“self-esteem is part of a sociometer that monitors peoples’ relational value in other people’s eyes”
it's hard to contribute good things to others if you don't feel happy
they found that people who were left out of a group activity displayed heightened cortical activity in two specific areas of the brain—the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the anterior insula. These areas of the brain are associated with the experience of physical pain sensations
reminds me of the heartbreak lesson
Research has also shown that progress through the stages of relationship commitment (i.e., from singlehood to dating to marriage) is also associated with an increase in happiness
evolutionary: stability is safe
Researchers have found that high quality relationships between parents and children are associated with increased happiness, both for teenagers
agreed, teens who have a stable home-life and feel like they are close enough to their parents to be able to talk to them are most likely happier.
Similarly, some small societies practice shunning, a temporary period during which members withhold emotion, communication, and other forms of social contact as a form of punishment for wrongdoing.
was this used historically as a form of punishment?
They also spent less time alone.
Do "loners" actually feel happy? Loners being people who purposefully have few close relationships.
Some folks define happiness as a sense of peace, while others think of it as being healthy.
maybe a sense of not worrying about social stuff
social integration, or one’s degree of integration into social networks.
people who achieve this are not always happy/fufilled
It may seem intuitive that our strong urge to connect with others has to do with the boost we receive to our own well-being from relationships.
Is this influenced more by our own needs or by societies pressures to be liked and popular?
chances are they involved other people.
I've never really thought about this but it's so true!
We cluster in families, in cities, and in groups of friends.
Is this an evolutionary trait for humans? Are friends/family/others a safety net developed by our ancestors?
: Social psychologists sometimes need to deceive participants (e.g., using a cover story) to avoid demand characteristics by hiding the true nature of the study.
I'm guessing this is for the purpose of avoiding biased responses and results
96% of participants in psychology studies come from western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic countries (so-called WEIRD cultures; Henrich, Heine, & Norenzayan, 2010), and that the majority of these are also psychology students, the question of non-representativeness becomes even more serious.
basically you'd need to find the most unbiased, various types of people to get an honest response.
internet samples are in many ways more diverse and representative than samples recruited from human subject pools
A person who is anonymous and not directly communicating with an interviewer is more likely to be honest and more natural because their is no motive to conform to socially favored behaviors or responses.
they will act more naturally.
if they didn't use this method, subjects in the experiment may be influenced to act in a better more kind way which makes the results of the experiment unnatural.
complex experimental designs, with multiple independent and/or dependent variables, has grown increasingly popular because they permit researchers to study both the individual and joint effects of several factors on a range of related situations.
For social psychology specifically, there is never just one factor that plays into decision making, often many different internal and external factors.
this allows scientists to precisely manipulate the independent variable, or “cause” (the presence of others), and to measure the dependent variable, or “effect” (performance)—in other words, to collect data.
This is a really interesting idea because I didn't think that psychology could be played out in the same way that you'd carry out a chemistry expirement.
in this case, having children reel in a length of fishing line as fast as they could
As this is a common goal or perceived success, the faster you reach that goal the better they believe that they will be perceived socially.
iding in competitive races appeared to improve riders’ times by about 20-30 seconds every mile compared to when they rode the same courses alone.
Competitiveness and comparisons often motivate or influence one's motivation/success.
implicit measures may reveal biases that participants do not report on explicit measures.
Again, you subconscious may have more influence than one expects.
our reasoning is often influenced by our motivations and mood.
Our subconscious is often the root of our behaviors and decisions.
badly they will feel after a negative event—such as losing a job—and they also overestimate how happy they will feel after a positive event—
I definitely can relate to this as well as other people can, I feel like its common for people to overstimate how good they'll if the succeed at something when in reality it may be the same as any other postive emotion.
a perceiver may quickly judge a female to be an athlete based on the fact that the female is tall, muscular, and wearing sports apparel—which fits the perceiver’s representation of an athlete’s characteristics.
This could definitely be the root of a lot of prejudice and stereotypes.
to
This reminds me of when I learned about how it can be really uncomfortable for humans to not be able to categorize things.
. A schema (related to the word schematic) is kind of like a mental blueprint for how we expect something to be or behave. It
I think this relates to the last article because now others behavior is a reflection of what we've experienced in the world.
if we know the thoughts contributing to the behavior.
I feel like people reflect on their past behaviors to make inferences about how they understand peoples behaviors.
The area of social psychology that focuses on how people think about others and about the social world is called social cognition.
Jumping to conclusions, paranoia and insecurities
In autobiographical reasoning, a narrator is able to derive substantive conclusions about the self from analyzing his or her own personal experiences
I said something similar above but this is when someone looks iternally to reflect upon a decision or response and thinks about why they did or reacted a certain way.
In this rich passage, Erikson intimates that the development of a mature identity in young adulthood involves the I’s ability to construct a retrospective and prospective story about the Me
This is the I trying to figure out the identity of me
n this sense, psychologically we do choose our parents, our family history, and the history of our kings, heroes, and gods
Would this mean deciding to follow in the footsteps of parents, ancestors, etc.?
Once a child understands that other people’s behavior is often motivated by inner desires and goals, it is a small step to apprehend the self in similar terms.
I feel like this could be as simple as a child realizing that when their mother is hungry she goes to the fridge and grabs food.
Each time you walk out on stage, you have a chance to start anew.
This makes me think about how college is a place to start fresh with new people. This idea applies to these three identities as you will theoretically have the opportunity to present a different version of yourself to a new audience.
reflexiveReflexivityThe idea that the self reflects back upon itself; that the I (the knower, the subject) encounters the Me (the known, the object). Reflexivity is a fundamental property of human selfhood.—it reflects back on itself.
For myself, this reminds about when I make a decision and think "what about the experiences I've had, has influenced me to make that decision or react the way that I have".
performing
I feel like this is similar to the backstage and frontstage self. In other words, who you truly are vs. who you display to others. These identities can obviosuly intertwine and be as exposed as an indiviual decides.
Me
I think this would be the conscious and unconscious parts of your mind "meeting"