38 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2024
    1. As a member of society, we hope you are informed about the role social media plays in shaping society, such as how design decisions and bots can influence social movements (polarizing, spreading, or stifling different them), and the different economic, social, and governmental pressures that social media platforms operate under. We hope you are then able to advocate for ways of improving how social media operates in society. That might be through voting, or pressuring government officials, or spreading ideas and information, or organizing coordinated actions or protests.

      As a responsible member of society, I'm committed to understanding the profound impact of social media on our collective narrative. Armed with insights into design nuances, the influence of bots, and the intricate web of societal pressures on these platforms.

    1. As a social media user, we hope you are informed about things like: how social media works, how they influence your emotions and mental state, how your data gets used or abused, strategies in how people use social media, and how harassment and spam bots operate. We hope with this you can be a more informed user of social media, better able to participate, protect yourself, and make it a valuable experience for you and others you interact with. For example, you can hopefully recognize when someone is intentionally posting something bad or offensive (like the bad cooking videos we mentioned in the Virality chapter, or an intentionally offensive statement) in an attempt to get people to respond and spread their content. Then you can decide how you want to engage (if at all) given how they are trying to spread their content.

      As I journey forward in the realm of social media, armed with these insights, I'll be more mindful of the intricate workings – how my emotions sway, what happens to my precious data, and the crafty tactics at play. Recognizing those intentionally provocative posts or offensive content will be second nature, and I'll wield my knowledge like a shield. It's not just about me, though; it's about fostering a positive space for all.

    1. Colonialism is when one group or country subjugates another group, often imposing laws, religion, culture, and languages on that group, and taking resources from them. Colonialism is often justified by belief that the subjugated people are inferior (e.g., barbaric, savage, godless, backwards), and the superiority of the group doing the subjugation (e.g., civilized, advanced). Key figures: Hernán Cortés, 1500s, Spain → America Francisco Pizarro, 1500s, Spain → South America John Smith, 1600s, England → North America King Leopold II of Belgium, 1800s, Belgium → Congo “White Saviors”# Sometimes colonialism is a little bit more subtle. For example, the term “White Savior” is a sarcastic term for white people being seen as liberating or rescuing “helpless” non-white people. This is common in TV and movies (see the TVTropes entries on Mighty Whitey, and White Man’s Burden). For example, consider movies like James Cameron’s Avatar movies, Dances with Wolves, The Last Samuri (starring the Tom Cruise), The Blind Side, The Help, La La Land (where a white man is trying to save “real” Jazz music), etc.

      Colonialism is like a big bully move where one group or country bosses around another, forcing them to follow their rules, adopt their beliefs, and even speak their language. It's all about taking stuff from the weaker group.

    1. Capitalism is: “an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market” Merriam-Webster Dictionary In other words, capitalism is a system where: Individuals or corporations own businesses These business owners make what they want and set their own prices. They compete with other businesses to convince customers to buy their products. These business owners then hire wage laborers at predetermined rates for their work, while the owners get the excess business profits or losses.

      This concept relates to our country that we live in a capitalist country, which is like participating in a large economic game. In this game, individuals or corporations own businesses and have the freedom to make their own products, set prices, and compete with other businesses for customers. Business owners hire workers at agreed-upon rates, while they retain the profits or bear the losses.

    1. The term “cancel culture” can be used for public shaming and criticism, but is used in a variety of ways, and it doesn’t refer to just one thing. The offense that someone is being canceled for can range from sexual assault of minors (e.g., R. Kelly, Woody Allen, Kevin Spacey), to minor offenses or even misinterpretations. The consequences for being “canceled” can range from simply the experience of being criticized, to loss of job or criminal charges. Given the huge range of things “cancel culture” can be referring to, we’ll mostly stick to talking here about “public shaming,” and “public criticism.”

      It is interesting to learn the meaning of cancel culture that the consequences of being "canceled" can be different too, from just facing criticism to losing a job or even getting into legal trouble. It's a big and varied topic, involving lots of emotions and different situations for different people.

    1. Before we talk about public criticism and shaming and adults, let’s look at the role of shame in childhood. In at least some views about shame and childhood1, shame and guilt hold different roles in childhood development: Shame is the feeling that “I am bad,” and the natural response to shame is for the individual to hide, or the community to ostracize the person. Guilt is the feeling that “This specific action I did was bad.” The natural response to feeling guilt is for the guilty person to want to repair the harm of their action.

      These emotions play a crucial role in shaping how we see ourselves and how we navigate the complexities of growing up. Understanding this delicate balance is essential for fostering a compassionate environment for the development of people's minds.

    1. While anyone is vulnerable to harassment online (and offline as well), some people and groups are much more prone to harassment, particularly marginalized and oppressed people in a society. Historically of course, different demographic groups have been subject to harassment or violence, such as women, LGBTA+ people, and Black people (e.g., the FBI trying to convince Martin Luther King Jr. to commit suicide). On social media this is true as well. For example, the last section mentioned the (partially bot-driven) harassment campaign against Meghan Markle and Prince Henry was at least partially driven by Meghan Markle being Black (the same racism shown in the British Press). When Amnesty International looked at online harassment, they found that: Women of colour, (black, Asian, Latinx and mixed-race women) were 34% more likely to be mentioned in abusive or problematic tweets than white women. Black women were disproportionately targeted, being 84% more likely than white women to be mentioned in abusive or problematic tweets.

      t's a sad reality that marginalized and oppressed communities face higher risks of abusive and problematic behavior on social media. As an Asian individual, it hits more to me that knowing people who look like me might be more vulnerable to such negativity. It's crucial for us to collectively stand against online harassment, advocating for a safer and more inclusive online space for everyone, regardless of their background or identity.

    1. Individual harassment (one individual harassing another individual) has always been part of human cultures, bur social media provides new methods of doing so. There are many methods by which through social media. This can be done privately through things like: Bullying: like sending mean messages through DMs Cyberstalking: Continually finding the account of someone, and creating new accounts to continue following them. Or possibly researching the person’s physical location. Hacking: Hacking into an account or device to discover secrets, or make threats. Tracking: An abuser might track the social media use of their partner or child to prevent them from making outside friends. They may even install spy software on their victim’s phone. Death threats / rape threats Etc.

      Bullying and harassment on social media are real and hurtful. People can send mean messages, stalk others, or even hack into accounts. It's like invading someone's personal space and can get really scary, especially when it involves threats. Imagine someone tracking your every move or making you feel unsafe online. It's not okay, and we need to stand up against such behavior to make the online world a kinder and safer place for everyone.

    2. Individual harassment (one individual harassing another individual) has always been part of human cultures, bur social media provides new methods of doing so. There are many methods by which through social media. This can be done privately through things like: Bullying: like sending mean messages through DMs Cyberstalking: Continually finding the account of someone, and creating new accounts to continue following them. Or possibly researching the person’s physical location. Hacking: Hacking into an account or device to discover secrets, or make threats. Tracking: An abuser might track the social media use of their partner or child to prevent them from making outside friends. They may even install spy software on their victim’s phone. Death threats / rape threats Etc.

      Bullying and harassment on social media are real and hurtful. People can send mean messages, stalk others, or even hack into accounts. It's like invading someone's personal space and can get really scary, especially when it involves threats. Imagine someone tracking your every move or making you feel unsafe online. It's not okay, and we need to stand up against such behavior to make the online world a kinder and safer place for everyone.

    1. This small percentage of people doing most of the work in some areas is not a new phenomenon. In many aspects of our lives, some tasks have been done by a small group of people with specialization or resources. Their work is then shared with others. This goes back many thousands of years with activities such as collecting obsidian and making jewelry, to more modern activities like writing books, building cars, reporting on news, and making movies.

      It is impressing that this pattern goes way back, from ancient times when people collected obsidian and made jewelry to more recent activities like writing books, building cars, reporting news, and making movies. Showing how this has been happening in various aspects of life for a very long time.

    1. There have been many efforts to use computers to replicate the experience of communicating with someone in person, through things like video chats, or even telepresence robots]. But there are ways that attempts to recreate in-person interactions inevitably fall short and don’t feel the same. Instead though, we can look at different characteristics that computer systems can provide, and find places where computer-based communication works better, and is Beyond Being There (pdf here). Some of the different characteristics that means of communication can have include (but are not

      The paragraph talks about how people are trying to use technology like video chats and telepresence robots to recreate in-person communication. It recognizes the challenges in making it feel as real as face-to-face talks. Instead of just copying the in-person experience, it suggests looking at what makes computer communication special. This is different from other perspective that always critisize computer communication

    1. In the contexts of social media and public debate, moderation has a meaning that is about creating limits and boundaries about what is posted to keep things working well. But this meaning of “moderation” grew out of a wider, more generic concept of moderation. You might remember seeing moderation coming up in lists of virtues in virtue ethics, back in Chapter 2. So what does moderation (the social practice of limiting what is posted) have to do with moderation (the abstract ethical quality)?

      this paragraph explained that moderation in social media means putting limits on what people can post to keep things running smoothly. But this idea of moderation originally comes from a bigger concept in ethics – being moderate in your actions which would lead to deeper understanding.

    1. In order to make social media sites usable and interesting to users, they may ban different types of content such as advertisements, disinformation, or off-topic posts. Almost all social media sites (even the ones that claim “free speech”) block spam, mass-produced unsolicited messages, generally advertisements, scams, or trolling.

      This paragraph talks about the benefits of to keep social media engaging, which they block things like ads, fake news, and off-topic stuff. Even those sites claiming "free speech" don't allow spam, scams, or trolling. It's their way of making sure that we have a good experience, but it also brings up discussions about balancing free speech and platform rules.

    1. The seeking out of bad news, or trying to get news even though it might be bad, has existed as long as people have kept watch to see if a family member will return home safely. But of course, new mediums can provide more information to sift through and more quickly, such as with the advent of the 24-hour news cycle in the 1990s, or, now social media.

      People have always looked for news, even the not-so-good kind, dating back to keeping watch for the safe return of family members. With the rise of the 24-hour news cycle in the '90s and now social media, we get more information faster. It is not healthy for our mental health because that way we are explosed to bad news 24/7.

    2. The seeking out of bad news, or trying to get news even though it might be bad, has existed as long as people have kept watch to see if a family member will return home safely. But of course, new mediums can provide more information to sift through and more quickly, such as with the advent of the 24-hour news cycle in the 1990s, or, now social media.

      People have always looked for news, even the not-so-good kind, dating back to keeping watch for the safe return of family members. With the rise of the 24-hour news cycle in the '90s and now social media, we get more information faster. It is not healthy for our mental health because that way we are explosed to bad news 24/7.

    3. The seeking out of bad news, or trying to get news even though it might be bad, has existed as long as people have kept watch to see if a family member will return home safely. But of course, new mediums can provide more information to sift through and more quickly, such as with the advent of the 24-hour news cycle in the 1990s, or, now social media.

      People have always looked for news, even the not-so-good kind, dating back to keeping watch for the safe return of family members. With the rise of the 24-hour news cycle in the '90s and now social media, we get more information faster. It is not healthy for our mental health because that way we are explosed to bad news 24/7.

    4. The seeking out of bad news, or trying to get news even though it might be bad, has existed as long as people have kept watch to see if a family member will return home safely. But of course, new mediums can provide more information to sift through and more quickly, such as with the advent of the 24-hour news cycle in the 1990s, or, now social media.

      People have always looked for news, even the not-so-good kind, dating back to keeping watch for the safe return of family members. With the rise of the 24-hour news cycle in the '90s and now social media, we get more information faster. It is not healthy for our mental health because that way we are explosed to bad news 24/7.

    1. Many have anecdotal experiences with their own mental health and those they talk to. For example, cosmetic surgeons have seen how photo manipulation on social media has influenced people’s views of their appearance: People historically came to cosmetic surgeons with photos of celebrities whose features they hoped to emulate. Now, they’re coming with edited selfies. They want to bring to life the version of themselves that they curate through apps like FaceTune and Snapchat.

      In summary, functions like filters and photo editing have become much simpler, and everyone uses filters when posting photos. Personally, if I don't edit my photos, I would definitely not post them on social media.

    2. Many have anecdotal experiences with their own mental health and those they talk to. For example, cosmetic surgeons have seen how photo manipulation on social media has influenced people’s views of their appearance: People historically came to cosmetic surgeons with photos of celebrities whose features they hoped to emulate. Now, they’re coming with edited selfies. They want to bring to life the version of themselves that they curate through apps like FaceTune and Snapchat.

      In summary, functions like filters and photo editing have become much simpler, and everyone uses filters when posting photos. Personally, if I don't edit my photos, I would definitely not post them on social media.

    1. We’ll include several examples on this page from the TikTok Duet feature, which allows people to build off the original video by recording a video of themselves to play at the same time next to the original. So for example, This tweet thread of TikTok videos (cross-posted to Twitter) starts with one Tiktok user singing a short parody musical of an argument in a grocery store. The subsequent tweets in the thread build on the prior versions, first where someone adds themselves singing the other half of the argument, then where someone adds themselves singing the part of their child, then where someone adds themselves singing the part of an employee working at the store1:

      This Twitter thread shows how TikTok's Duet feature lets users add to each other's videos. It's like a chain of creative collaboration. One user starts with a parody musical, and others could join in, singing different parts and building on the original. It's a fun way people on TikTok can work together to create something new. I also personally tried this function!! it is very interacting.

    2. We’ll include several examples on this page from the TikTok Duet feature, which allows people to build off the original video by recording a video of themselves to play at the same time next to the original. So for example, This tweet thread of TikTok videos (cross-posted to Twitter) starts with one Tiktok user singing a short parody musical of an argument in a grocery store. The subsequent tweets in the thread build on the prior versions, first where someone adds themselves singing the other half of the argument, then where someone adds themselves singing the part of their child, then where someone adds themselves singing the part of an employee working at the store

      This Twitter thread shows how TikTok's Duet feature lets users add to each other's videos. It's like a chain of creative collaboration. I think It's a fun way people on TikTok can work together to create something new.

    1. In the 1976 book The Selfish Gene, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins1 said rather than looking at the evolution of organisms, it made even more sense to look at the evolution of the genes of those organisms (sections of DNA that perform some functions and are inherited). For example, if a bee protects its nest by stinging an attacking animal and dying, then it can’t reproduce and it might look like a failure of evolution. But if the gene that told the bee to die protecting the nest was shared by the other bees in the nest, then that one bee dying allows the gene to keep being replicated, so the gene is successful evolutionarily.

      I like how the textbook give examples in the book "The Selfish Gene," which suggests looking at evolution from a gene-centered perspective. Instead of focusing on individual organisms, the uses the example help me understand the concept better. This concept also highlights the "selfish" nature of genes, prioritizing their continuity and replication over individual survival.

    2. In the 1976 book The Selfish Gene, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins1 said rather than looking at the evolution of organisms, it made even more sense to look at the evolution of the genes of those organisms (sections of DNA that perform some functions and are inherited). For example, if a bee protects its nest by stinging an attacking animal and dying, then it can’t reproduce and it might look like a failure of evolution. But if the gene that told the bee to die protecting the nest was shared by the other bees in the nest, then that one bee dying allows the gene to keep being replicated, so the gene is successful evolutionarily.

      I like how the textbook give examples in the book "The Selfish Gene," which suggests looking at evolution from a gene-centered perspective. Instead of focusing on individual organisms, the uses the example help me understand the concept better. This concept also highlights the "selfish" nature of genes, prioritizing their continuity and replication over individual survival.

    3. In the 1976 book The Selfish Gene, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins1 said rather than looking at the evolution of organisms, it made even more sense to look at the evolution of the genes of those organisms (sections of DNA that perform some functions and are inherited). For example, if a bee protects its nest by stinging an attacking animal and dying, then it can’t reproduce and it might look like a failure of evolution. But if the gene that told the bee to die protecting the nest was shared by the other bees in the nest, then that one bee dying allows the gene to keep being replicated, so the gene is successful evolutionarily.

      I like how the textbook give examples in the book "The Selfish Gene," which suggests looking at evolution from a gene-centered perspective. Instead of focusing on individual organisms, the uses the example help me understand the concept better. This concept also highlights the "selfish" nature of genes, prioritizing their continuity and replication over individual survival.

    1. Individual analysis focuses on the behavior, bias, and responsibility an individual has, while systemic analysis focuses on the how organizations and rules may have their own behaviors, biases, and responsibility that aren’t necessarily connected to what any individual inside intends. For example, there were differences in US criminal sentencing guidelines between crack cocaine vs. powder cocaine in the 90s. The guidelines suggested harsher sentences on the version of cocaine more commonly used by Black people, and lighter sentences on the version of cocaine more commonly used by white people. Therefore, when these guidelines were followed, they had have racially biased (that is, racist) outcomes regardless of intent or bias of the individual judges. (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Sentencing_Act).

      This paragraph addressed such systemic issues, it shows that it is essential to challenge existing rules, policies, and structures to ensure they are free from creator biases and contribute to equitable outcomes for all members of society. I think this awareness is very important for online environment.

    1. When social media platforms show users a series of posts, updates, friend suggestions, ads, or anything really, they have to use some method of determining which things to show users. The method of determining what is shown to users is called a recommendation algorithm, which is an algorithm (a series of steps or rules, such as in a computer program) that recommends posts for users to see, people for users to follow, ads for users to view, or reminders for users.

      As social media users we should become more aware of the algorithms shaping our online experiences, there is a growing demand for transparency and control over algorithmic processes. Social media platforms should starts to address these concerns, provide clear explanations of how recommendation algorithms work.

    2. When social media platforms show users a series of posts, updates, friend suggestions, ads, or anything really, they have to use some method of determining which things to show users. The method of determining what is shown to users is called a recommendation algorithm, which is an algorithm (a series of steps or rules, such as in a computer program) that recommends posts for users to see, people for users to follow, ads for users to view, or reminders for users.

      As social media users we should become more aware of the algorithms shaping our online experiences, there is a growing demand for transparency and control over algorithmic processes. Social media platforms should start address these concerns, provide clear explanations of how recommendation algorithms work.

    1. Another way of managing disabilities is assistive technology, which is something that helps a disabled person act as though they were not disabled. In other words, it is something that helps a disabled person become more “normal” (according to whatever a society’s assumptions are). For example:

      The statement looks the diversity of disabilities and the varied experiences of individuals within disabled communities. While assistive technology can indeed enhance accessibility and independence, framing its purpose as making individuals appear "normal" risks reinforcing harmful . A more inclusive approach acknowledges and perspectives of individuals with disabilities should be consider in the future.

    1. Some disabilities are visible disabilities that other people can notice by observing the disabled person (e.g., wearing glasses is an indication of a visual disability, or a missing limb might be noticeable). Other disabilities are invisible disabilities that other people cannot notice by observing the disabled person (e.g., chronic fatigue syndrome, contact lenses for a visual disability, or a prosthetic for a missing limb covered by clothing). Sometimes people with invisible disabilities get unfairly accused of “faking” or “making up” their disability (e.g., someone who can walk short distances but needs to use a wheelchair when going long distances).

      this effectively conveys that visible disabilities are those readily observable, like wearing glasses or having a missing limb, while invisible disabilities, such as chronic fatigue syndrome or the use of contact lenses, may not be immediately apparent. This brief explanation helps to raise awareness about the diversity of disabilities and challenges common assumptions about disability.

    2. Some disabilities are visible disabilities that other people can notice by observing the disabled person (e.g., wearing glasses is an indication of a visual disability, or a missing limb might be noticeable). Other disabilities are invisible disabilities that other people cannot notice by observing the disabled person (e.g., chronic fatigue syndrome, contact lenses for a visual disability, or a prosthetic for a missing limb covered by clothing).

      This effectively conveys that visible disabilities are those readily observable, like wearing glasses or having a missing limb, while invisible disabilities, such as chronic fatigue syndrome or the use of contact lenses, may not be immediately apparent. This brief explanation helps to raise awareness about the diversity of disabilities and challenges common assumptions about disability.

  2. Jan 2024
    1. So read through the official brochure on the EU’s GDPR privacy law (for this activity ignore any additional details or clarifications made elsewhere in the GDPR, since those weren’t deemed important enough to put on this brochure). Then do the following (preferably on paper or in a blank computer document):

      It is interesting identifying this CIDER method seeks to enhance the inclusivity and effectiveness of the GDPR. Which recognize the importance of ongoing learning and adaptation in design GDPR.

    1. Some governments and laws protect the privacy of individuals (using a Natural Rights ethical framing). These include the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which includes a “right to be forgotten”, and the United State’s Supreme Court has at times inferred a constitutional right to privacy.

      Despite the existence of regulations such as the GDPR and constitutional considerations for privacy, it's concerning to see privacy invasion and improper use of personal information. Maybe government should try to implant more equitable regulations related to online privacy.

    1. Datasets can be poisoned unintentionally. For example, many scientists posted online surveys that people can get paid to take. Getting useful results depended on a wide range of people taking them. But when one TikToker’s video about taking them went viral, the surveys got filled out with mostly one narrow demographic, preventing many of the datasets from being used as intended. See more in

      This information highlights a common and unintentional issue in data collection. Scientists often create online surveys to gather diverse responses, hoping to get a representative sample. However, the unintended consequence occurred when a TikTok video went viral, leading to a flood of responses from a specific demographic. Which effect the balance of data collection and even well-intentioned efforts can be disrupted by unforeseen events in the vast landscape of the internet.

    1. One thing to note in the above case of candle reviews and COVID is that just because something appears to be correlated, doesn’t mean that it is connected in the way it looks like. In the above, the correlation might be due mostly to people buying and reviewing candles in the fall, and diseases, like COVID, spreading most during the fall.

      It's interesting to note that just because there's a correlation between two things, it doesn't necessarily mean one causes the other. In the case of candle reviews and COVID, the correlation might be more about both events happening during the fall. People tend to buy and review candles more in the fall, and it's also a time when diseases like COVID tend to spread. It's a good reminder to dig deeper into the context and consider other factors before jumping to conclusions about causation based on correlation.

    1. One of the traditional pieces of advice for dealing with trolls is “Don’t feed the trolls,” which means that if you don’t respond to trolls, they will get bored and stop trolling. We can see this advice as well in the trolling community’s own “Rules of the Internet”:

      This advice aligns with a rule from the trolling community itself, stating that arguing with trolls implies their victory, possibly implying that engagement fuels their actions. Essentially, both pieces of advise encourage against providing trolls with the satisfaction of a reaction, in the hopes that this may discourage or minimize their trolling activity. This idea of arguing with trolls means that we lost is also very important and interesting idea.

    1. Additionally, the inauthentic arguments have long been observed, and were memorably explored by Jean-Paul Sartre as “Bad Faith”. “Bad faith” here means pretending to hold views or feelings, while not actually holding them (this may be intentional, or it may be through self-deception).

      This quoted concept goes beyond the surface of deception, going into the psychological battles that people face when accepting their freedom and the responsibility that comes with it. When someone engages in "Bad Faith," they frequently follow to cultural standards, play roles, or hide actual aspirations in order to avoid the burden of existential responsibility.

    1. Parasocial relationships are when a viewer or follower of a public figure (that is, a celebrity) feel like they know the public figure, and may even feel a sort of friendship with them, but the public figure doesn’t know the viewer at all.

      This is very interesting because that does happens a lot in people around me. I have a lot of friends that they call their beloved celebrities brothers or husbands, which I don't really understand because the public figure doesn't even know them.

    1. The way we present ourselves to others around us (our behavior, social role, etc.) is called our public persona. We also may change how we behave and speak depending on the situation or who we are around, which is called code-switching.

      The prevalence of multiple personas on social media makes this intriguing to me. People frequently behave differently when they are in front of a screen. Furthermore, a lot of people identify quite differently.The concept of a public persona and code-switching also reflects the dynamic nature of human behavior and communication.