This attitude of superiority is one that is often found among those who have been lucky enough to receive an education toward those who may have not been. The introduction of "barbarism" and "wretchedness" as well as "eating acorns and roots" creates a contrast that the creators of this document wish to call attention to: that they believe there is a stark difference between those who attend college and those who have not. The difference lies in intelligence as well as way of life, which they mentioned by criticizing the lack of progress made by "our indigenous neighbours". I have definitely seen an attitude similar to this held by those who attend college when they talk about those who haven't. Some people assume that just because they attend college, or UVA specifically, that they are somehow worth more than someone who perhaps goes to community college or decided not to go to college.

It is interesting to me how this document is creating sentiment of dependency. It is made clear that UVA is to be a place that will produce leaders and people who will benefit the public with their contributions after they leave the University. It makes the University seem like a very important place because hope is being placed into the future of its graduates as strong public leaders.

An emphasis on physical fitness is not a part of the University's mission today, as college students work out on their own schedule. It seems that the concept of exercise was introduced for two reasons: 1) to ensure fitness for potential military endeavors, as the men would be potentially eligible for a draft, and 2) a connection is made between physical fitness and the agility of the brain. Fear of maintaining masculinity also plays a role in this inclusion, for exercise is referred to as "the practices of manhood". The preparation for these men to become strong, head of the household protectors seemed something important enough for the University to wish to include in the curriculum.

Initially, I was not sure if this document meant THE Constitution, the governing document of the United States, because of something as small as a lack of capitalization. I believe that it is what the writers are referring to. It is interesting that the writers decided to make reference to the Constitution, and let it influence the formation of their document and the potential of their University. It was a rarity in this time to forego religion as a driving force for a new endeavor, as people were often looking for something to help create a strong foundation. I praise the minds behind the Rockfish Gap Report for separating the church and education.

jkelds