2 Matching Annotations
  1. Aug 2015
    1. Yet a public official reading only the IPCC's "Summary for Policy Makers" would gain little sense of the extent or implications of these deficiencies.

      The whole point of that section is to communicate the scientific consensus—the bottom line from the scientists with a deep understanding of the evidence and intricacies of the computer models—to those without that background. They consider all the evidence and confidence levels and err on the side of underestimating the projected effects to reach a consensus for "settled climate science."

      You probably aren't qualified to determine whether your brake pads need replacement, so you take your car to a mechanic (or two) for their professional assessment. Do you question the scientific modeling used to make that determination and immerse yourself in materials science and physics to verify it? No, you probably trust the science and pay to have your brakes replaced to keep you and your family safe.

    2. Although the Earth's average surface temperature rose sharply by 0.9 degree Fahrenheit during the last quarter of the 20th century, it has increased much more slowly for the past 16 years

      This completely ignores other factors that contribute to and accumulate heat such as the ocean. Looking at the complete picture we see that there really was no hiatus after all.