competition between beneficial and pathogenic microbes
We talked about this in micro. It is much harder for a pathogenic bacteria to establish itself near the plant if there are already many beneficial bacteria colonizing the area.
competition between beneficial and pathogenic microbes
We talked about this in micro. It is much harder for a pathogenic bacteria to establish itself near the plant if there are already many beneficial bacteria colonizing the area.
These microbes can almost be viewed as an extension of the plant into the soil. Like the human gut microbiome
I never realized how much the gut is similar to the root zone. The villi in the intestine are like the root hairs in plants, and they both have an important mutualistic relationship with bacteria.
Metagenomics allows species to be sequenced from soil samples without culturing, largely overcoming this bottleneck.
That's so cool!
Flavonoids are a group of phenolics that can be specifically exuded into the rhizosphere as signal molecules to attract rhizobia
Do they attract other bacteria as well?
Rhizosphere acidification affects nutrient acquisition by liberating cations from negative adsorption sites on clay surfaces and solubilising phosphate from phosphate-fixing soils.
Interesting. We have talked about this in soils.
Enzymes are also released from roots, particularly phosphatases, which cleave inorganic phosphate from organic sources
This is cool
Barber and Martin (1976) showed that 7–13% of net photosynthate was released by wheat roots over three weeks under sterile conditions while 18–25% was released when roots were not sterile. This difference might be considered carbon released because of microbially-induced demand in the rhizosphere, and therefore made unavailable for plant growth.
I never realized how much carbon was released by the plant into the soil. I guess it just shows how important the microbes are to the plant's health.
rhizosphere
Or as Dr Steffan calls it, "the party zone" for bacteria.
kilometres of new roots each year
Its interesting how much faster roots grow compared to shoots.
Wheat, a monocot, has a dual root system. Seminal roots emerge from the seed and nodal roots (thicker roots on the outside of the picture) emerge from the crown, a group of closely packed nodes from which tillers emerge.
Interesting. I never knew this. What is the purpose of a dual root system?
mass flow is driven by plant transpiration and is the movement of soil solution along a water potential gradient.
This would be the movement of the nutrients in the xylem?
Na (for many sea-shore plants).
Its interesting that plants who grow in more saline environments have adapted to actually need Na.
Efficient root growth is also an important factor in maximising yield with lower fertiliser applications because ‘wasted’ root growth costs energy that could otherwise be invested in the crop of interest
I have never thought of it this way. I think its easy to forget how much of the plant's biomass is devoted to the roots.
Over long periods, sucrose is taken up slowly but permeability relative to water is negligible.
Makes sense
Turgor changes also change the curvature of hairs of insectivorous plants. In the case of the Venus fly trap, sensory hairs coupled to an electrical signalling system require stimulation at least twice within a 30 s period
I never knew this!
This occurs because nutrient uptake is an active process, independent of water uptake from the soil, and continues during the night – the rate of nutrient uptake varies little over 24 h.
Cool
The Casparian strip and the suberisation of the endodermis is important as it provides a barrier to prevent back-flow of water and also structural support so that the root can contain a positive pressure at night.
Interesting. I never thought about the structural affects of the Casparian strip
The distribution of water in the different pathways depends not only on the age of the root, but may also vary with the flux of water moving through, that is, the rate of transpiration.
Makes sense.
the Casparian strip in the primary wall prevents flow of water and solutes through the wall from inner cortex to stele
This is cool. What in interesting adaption to prevent excess soil solution from being pulled into the xylem.
Figure 3.47.
This is a helpful figure.
whole length of a leaf blade while small veins and their transverse connections distribute water locally, drawing it from the large veins
This is really cool. It reminds me of our circulatory system.
A rapidly transpiring leaf can evaporate its own fresh weight of water in 10 to 20 min, though many plants such as cacti, mangroves and plants in deep shade have much smaller rates of water turnover
The amount of variation between how much is plants transpire is amazing! It shows how well these plants are adapted to their environment
move water to the canopy at rates that satisfy the transpirational water loss at the leaf surface.
This is so important. The amount of water that plants transpire is crazy!
The concentrations also vary at different times of day, being lowest in the middle of the day when transpiration is highest, and quite high at night when stomates are closed so there is very little flow of sap to the shoots.
This is really interesting. It makes sense though.
When the vessels mature, and their end walls disintegrate, their cellular contents are carried away by the transpiration stream.
This is interesting. I never thought about what happened to the parts of the cell that disintegrate
allows plants to move large quantities of water from the soil to the transpiring leaf surface with little input of metabolic energy
This is cool
hydrostatic pressure falls by 10 kPa for each metre increase in height
Interesting
Figure 3.9.
This is cool. We did a lab similar to this in gen bio.
Water will flow from a sample with a high water potential to one with a low water potential
Important to remember
1 MPa applied over 100 cm2 is equivalent to a weight of one tonne
This is so cool. I've seen tree roots lift concrete sidewalks but never thought about how much pressure is required to do so.
The ratio of water lost to CO2 taken up is around 300:1 in most land plants
This would explain why processes like C4 and CAM photosynthesis occur.
Water loss also has a benefit in maintaining the leaf temperature through evaporative cooling
Do CAM plants get warmer during the day because they don't open their stomata?
a large tree may transpire hundreds of litres of water in a day.
That is a lot of water
The nature of this ‘CO2 pump’ and the energetics of carbon assimilation are not fully characterised in SAM plants but considerable CO2 concentrations do build up within leaves, enhancing assimilation and suppressing photorespiration.
Does this mean they don't really know how underwater photosynthesis works?
CAM species outnumbering C4 species by about two to one
I didn't know CAM species were this common.
The biomass production per unit water utilized in CAM was 6 times higher than for C3 plants and 2 times higher than for C4 plants when plants exhibiting all three photosynthetic pathways were grown together in a garden outdoors (Winter et al. 2005).
This is cool
C3-C4 photosynthesis does not improve photosynthetic efficiency
This isn't what I would have thought.You would think C3/C4 plants would have an advantage.
The inter-connecting cytoplasm between the two intra-cellular compartments
So there are two different organelles within the one cell?
CO2 assimilation by all three C4 subtypes
Its weird how this mechanism has evolved independently so many times, but all the C4 species fall into only three different groups.
Figure 2.7.
This figure is so helpful! It sums up this whole section.
maximum photosynthetic rates were double twentieth century values
Would this mean the plants were larger on average, or they just grow/develop faster?
include several important food crops such as maize and sugarcane
Interesting. I didn't know that.
Rubisco first evolved when the earth’s atmosphere was rich in CO2, but virtually devoid of O2
Rubisco evolved because of its ability to utilize the high levels of CO2 in the atmosphere, but its evolution is what ended up lowering the levels of atmospheric CO2. So, it evolved because it was efficient at the time, but it is also what caused itself to be inefficient.
On a global scale, this investment equates to around 10 kg of nitrogen per person!
This is crazy
Figure 2.2
I will need to go over this
fructose-1,6-bisphosphate
Its interesting the same sugars in glycolysis are seen in photosynthesis.
PCR
Photosynthetic carbon reduction (not polymerase chain reaction).
UV is dissipated harmlessly, lowering quantum yield compared with growth-chamber plants
Would this also be the case with the Arabidopsis in the growth room? Don't our lights have UV light as well?
the Chl a/b ratio will be lower compared with that in strong light
So the Chl a/b ratio can change depending on the light intensity. How does the plant do this? How long does this change take?
Quantum yield is reduced as a consequence, and leads to a slight discrepancy between in vivo absorption maxima (Figure 1.8) and quantum yield
Can we go over this?
Fluorescence induction kinetics
I'll need to go over this section. This is where I get lost
the solution will appear deep red due to energy re-emitted as fluorescence
Didn't we do this in botany?
If the chloroplasts, still in the dark, are rapidly transferred to a pH 8.0 buffer containing ADP and Pi, ATP synthesis then occurs.
This is a simple experiment- but it is very effective in showing that ATP synthesis is driven by proton-motive force
A massive ΔpH, of approximately 3–4 pH units, equivalent to an H+ ion concentration difference of three to four orders of magnitude
This is so cool
four basic complexes

commonly 200–300 in each palisade cell
I had no idea there were that many chloroplasts in a single cell. That's really interesting.
both quantum yield and light-saturated plateaux depend on CO2 concentration
Show in figure 1.6
quantum yield expressed in terms of incident irradiance does not necessarily reflect the photosynthetic efficiency
Why not?
sensitivity of a leaf to these variables is not fixed but can change over time in response to, for example, drought.
Is this referring to a genetic change over time to become more drought tolerant? Or a hormonal response that occurs in the individual plant to conserve water? If it is a hormonal response, how do the plants sense how much moisture is present in the air/soil?
light profile
What is the light profile? What does that term mean?
pre-eminent
surpassing all others; important
Irregular-shaped cells in spongy tissues enhance scattering, increasing the path length of light
This is cool.
photosynthetic processes
This video helped me understand photosynthesis in Gen Bio 1, it might be a good review for this chapter Crash Course Photosynthesis
Figure 1.1 A
Can we go over this?
genotype x environment interactions
different genotypes respond to environmental variation in different ways
roots
and the root's mutualistic interactions with soil microbes.
If the loop was not complete, the structures that comprise it would not exist.
I don't totally understand what they mean by this
Plants
Plants are cool!