And although they may be poor, Not a man shall be a slave,
Interesting to note. This was written in 1862, a year before Emancipation.
And although they may be poor, Not a man shall be a slave,
Interesting to note. This was written in 1862, a year before Emancipation.
And we'll fill our vacant ranks with A million free men more,
Perhaps a play on how the Union had more men available than the South.
It’s important because over the past 30 years we have not acted with foresight relative to the science on climate change or the knowledge that oil and water are finite resources
We build things with our heads in the sand. It's all too easy to move on with our lives and forget about what we are doing to the planet because we don't see the immediate effects of our actions.
Why should we leave it to Harper & Brothers and Redding & Co. to select our reading?
While I can't find anything on Redding & Co. (though the name sounds familiar), this line led me down the rabbit hole of the history of HarperCollins. I had never paid publishing companies much attention, but Thoreau brings up an excellent point here about the monopolies they had over public access at this time.
It requires a training such as the athletes underwent, the steady intention almost of the whole life to this object. Books must be read as deliberately and reservedly as they were written
Again, the irony. We know that authors like Thoreau meant every word they put down on paper- it's up to us to interpret what they meant.
The heroic books, even if printed in the character of our mother tongue, will always be in a language dead to degenerate times; and we must laboriously seek the meaning of each word and line,
This is kind of how I feel reading this book. I have Oxford English Dictionary open because some of these words and their meaning then don't line up with today. How ironic!
For my part, I could easily do without the post-office. I think that there are very few important communications made through it. To speak critically, I never received more than one or two letters in my life—I wrote this some years ago—that were worth the postage.
Thoreau kind of seems condescending at points. Why do you have to bad-mouth the post office and the letters you receive?
The millions are awake enough for physical labor; but only one in a million is awake enough for effective intellectual exertion, only one in a hundred millions to a poetic or divine life. To be awake is to be alive. I have never yet met a man who was quite awake.
I don't know how to feel about this. On one hand, I feel like he's right, in that the masses are really only awake enough to adhere to a factory bell, but on the other, I'm almost sensing some classism here. Not everyone can afford to live like a hermit on a pond for years on end, Thoreau, to experience this state of being truly awake.
season
Thoreau uses the word "season" frequently, but not necessarily in the context we're used to. Oxford Dictionary only lists the typical definition of season, referring to the four periods of the year, but Thoreau says that the days have seasons, and in the beginning, he said that lifetimes have seasons too. I wonder what he means by it. Is it synonymous with "phases?"
King Tchingthang
Ningthou Ching-Thang Khomba was a Meitei monarch of the 18th century CE. The inventor of the Ras Lila dance, he is a legendary figure in Manipur, and much of his actions as King had been mythologized. (According to Wikipedia)
but was merely a defence against the rain
I like this line, hahaha.
To enjoy these advantages I was ready to carry it on; like Atlas, to take the world on my shoulders—I never heard what compensation he received for that
I thought it was Atlas's punishment to hold up the world, not that he was entitled to compensation.
his wife—every man has such a wife—changed her mind and wished to keep it,
That's rude, Thoreau. Was he personally a bit misogynistic, or is he just reflective of the time period's thinking?
Queequeg was George Washington cannibalistically developed.
There's a line I never expected to read...
hideously marred about the face – at least to my taste – his countenance yet had a something in it which was by no means disagreeable.
This line is so interesting following their "marital bed" scene.
But Queequeg, do you see, was a creature in the transition state – neither caterpillar nor butterfly. He was just enough civilized to show off his outlandishness in the strangest possible manner.
What an interesting way to characterize someone. I wonder what Ishmael looks like to Queequeg.
For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal. What’s all this fuss I have been making about, thought I to myself – the man’s a human being just as I am: he has just as much reason to fear me, as I have to be afraid of him. Better sleep with a sober cannibal than a drunken Christian.
I don't really understand Ishmael. Is this Melville's way of trying to get people to see past what's unfamiliar to us? To overlook differences in culture and accept others?
However, I had never been in the South Seas; and perhaps the sun there produced these extraordinary effects upon the skin.
I can tell that Melville is ridiculously wordy, but it seems as though he's having Ishmael go down this rabbit hole of a stream of consciousness. I think it's kind of funny how Ishmael makes these assumptions about this stranger but then follows it up with, "well, I've never experienced [blank], so that could be the reason." This is just interesting writing to me.
But be easy, be easy, this here harpooneer I have been tellin’ you of has just arrived from the south seas, where he bought up a lot of ‘balmed New Zealand heads (great curios, you know), and he’s sold all on ’em but one, and that one he’s trying to sell to-night, cause to-morrow’s Sunday, and it would not do to be sellin’ human heads about the streets when folks is goin’ to churches. He wanted to, last Sunday, but I stopped him just as he was goin’ out of the door with four heads strung on a string, for all the airth like a string of inions.”
In what world is that a good business? That's terrifying.
But no more of this blubbering now, we are going a-whaling
I had no idea his puns would be this beautiful.
it requires a strong moral principle to prevent me from deliberately stepping into the street, and methodically knocking people’s hats off
As in... literally knocking people's hats off? Ishmael, it shouldn't require that strong of a moral principle. I can't say I've ever been tempted to just knock someone's hat off.
“This is God’s curse on slavery!—a bitter, bitter, most accursed thing!—a curse to the master and a curse to the slave! I was a fool to think I could make anything good out of such a deadly evil. It is a sin to hold a slave under laws like ours,—I always felt it was,—I always thought so when I was a girl,—I thought so still more after I joined the church; but I thought I could gild it over,—I thought, by kindness, and care, and instruction, I could make the condition of mine better than freedom—fool that I was!”
This is such a bold thing for Stowe to write! I'm sure that many probably felt this way about owning slaves, but for Stowe to have one of her slave-owning characters openly declare that slavery is a sin is a major power move.
The evening meal at the house is over, and Aunt Chloe, who presided over its preparation as head cook, has left to inferior officers in the kitchen the business of clearing away and washing dishes, and come out into her own snug territories, to “get her ole man’s supper”; therefore, doubt not that it is her you see by the fire, presiding with anxious interest over certain frizzling items in a stew-pan, and anon with grave consideration lifting the cover of a bake-kettle, from whence steam forth indubitable intimations of “something good.”
Perhaps Stowe was establishing the idea of domesticity here.
“Well, it is dreadful,” said Eliza; “but, after all, he is your master, you know.” “My master! and who made him my master? That’s what I think of—what right has he to me? I’m a man as much as he is. I’m a better man than he is. I know more about business than he does; I am a better manager than he is; I can read better than he can; I can write a better hand,—and I’ve learned it all myself, and no thanks to him,—I’ve learned it in spite of him; and now what right has he to make a dray-horse of me?—to take me from things I can do, and do better than he can, and put me to work that any horse can do? He tries to do it; he says he’ll bring me down and humble me, and he puts me to just the hardest, meanest and dirtiest work, on purpose!”
I can just imagine how this was received by the white middle class in the North and the slave holders in the South. What justification is there for slavery?
It’s a free country, sir; the man’s mine,
The irony in that statement...
George had stood like one transfixed, at hearing his doom thus suddenly pronounced by a power that he knew was irresistible. He folded his arms, tightly pressed in his lips, but a whole volcano of bitter feelings burned in his bosom, and sent streams of fire through his veins. He breathed short, and his large dark eyes flashed like live coals; and he might have broken out into some dangerous ebullition, had not the kindly manufacturer touched him on the arm, and said, in a low tone, “Give way, George; go with him for the present. We’ll try to help you, yet.” The tyrant observed the whisper, and conjectured its import, though he could not hear what was said; and he inwardly strengthened himself in his determination to keep the power he possessed over his victim.
This is a fascinating display of character. At the beginning of this quote, George is a silent, raging inferno after his master's declaration. While he is stoic on the outside, there is a volcano ready to erupt within. At the end, however, despite all of this bubbling anger, all George really is is a poor "victim." The word victim doesn't inspire such feelings of rage and aggression, so acknowledging that he is a victim almost emasculates and demoralizes him.
Perhaps the mildest form of the system of slavery is to be seen in the State of Kentucky.
This declaration makes me think of why Douglass chose to stress that he lived in Maryland. Addressing the Northern reader with this, if these atrocities occurred in the "easy" slave states, imagine how bad they are in the "bad" slave states.
critters
He talks about the slaves as though they are subhuman. "You can distract them while you take their young away"- this sounds almost like separating a hen from her chicks, not a human from her child.
Now, Jim, show this gentleman how you can dance and sing.”
Ironic given that "Jump Jim Crow" was a singing and dancing show from the early 1830s that started this name.
For convenience sake, we have said, hitherto, two gentlemen. One of the parties, however, when critically examined, did not seem, strictly speaking, to come under the species.
Quite possibly one of my favorite burns ever.
Slave traders could rarely be considered "gentlemen."

For masochism, as Deleuze argues, is, “A phenomenon of the senses (ie., a certain combination of pain and pleasure); in its moral aspects it is a function of feeling or sentiment. But beyond all superpersonal elements that animates the masochist: this is the story in which he relates the triumph of the oral mother, the abolition of the father’s likeness and the consequent birth of the new man
Another interpretation of masochism
Masochism, like sadism, is the assumption of guilt
Alternative definition of masochism.
Yet the opposition between law, expressed by the uniform, and the contract, expressed by Lucia, is prominent here
Internal opposition in Max
Leopold Von Sacher-Masoch novels, the novels from which the term masochism originates.
Masochism term origin
Had Rampling’s character been developed beyond simply a tool for Max’s own discovery of the self, there might have been a genuine comment made of the loss of dignity and salvation.
The word "tool"
not navigable in the common law sense of the term
Common law!!
I think the verdict is both against law and evidence, and that a new trial ought to begranted
Interesting dissent
One of thewitnesses testified that before the defendants' dam was built, the plaintiffs might bring into their dam from one hundredto one hundred and fifty logs at a time, whereas at present they cannot more than twenty-five, and that logs arefrequently lost in getting them over, or past the upper dam; that by reason thereof, within four years past, he supposedthe plaintiffs had lost[**19]as much as four hundred logs, worth from thirty-five to forty pounds per hundred.
Damages sustained
I concur in the result of the opinions delivered
Same, dude. I concur on everything that's hard
ic utere tuo ut alienum non loedas
Use your own property in such a manner so as not to injure others
It is not pretended that the water is diverted, or that less business can be now done atthe plaintiffs' mill than formerly, but they are obliged to bring their logs a very little farther round in the river (in orderto get them into the dam), which is the principal, if not only inconvenience they are exposed to by the defendants'conduct.
!!!!! Minor inconvenience
or if the Legislature have declared such riversas the Conhocton, the Unadilla, the east branch of the Chenango, and the great variety of other inland waters, publichighways, as necessary to the public convenience, it must have been taken for granted that the Hudson River wasalready a public highway,
Drawing on other decisions by the legislature
If there is any true cause of fear respecting independence, it is because no plan is yet laid down. Men do not see their way out
True
No man was a warmer wisher for reconciliation than myself, before the fatal nineteenth of April 1775, but the moment the event of that day was made known, I rejected the hardened, sullen tempered Pharaoh of England for ever; and disdain the wretch, that with the pretended title of FATHER OF HIS PEOPLE, can unfeelingly hear of their slaughter, and composedly sleep with their blood upon his soul.
Bold
Nothing can be more fallacious than this kind of argument. We may as well assert that because a child has thrived upon milk, that it is never to have meat, or that the first twenty years of our lives is to become a precedent for the next twenty.
He gets sassy, using allusions to prove his point.
Educationcanneverbewhatitiscapableofbeing,unlesstheteachercancommandtimetobecomefamiliarwitheachindividualmindunderhiscare,andtoadapthismodeofteachingtoitspeculiarities.Toinstructonlyinmasses,andtoapplythesamemethodsofinstructiontoall,islikethrowingthedrugsofanapothecary'sshopintoonegreatcaldron—stirringthemtogether,andgivingeverypatientinthehospitalaportionofthemixture.
I really like this? Good analogy, dude.
Thechildren,therefore,receivedintothisinstitution,areoftenoftheveryworstandmosthopelesscharacter.Notonlyaretheirmindsmostthoroughlydepraved,buttheirverysensesandbodilyorganizationseemtopartakeintheviciousnessanddegradationoftheirhearts.Theirappetitesaresoperverted,thatsometimesthemostloathsomeanddisgustingsubstancesarepreferredtowholesomefood.TheSuperintendent,Mr.Wichern,states,thatthoughplentifullysuppliedwithprovisions,yetwhenfirstreceived,someofthemwillstealandeatsoap,rancidgreasethathasbeenlaidasideforthepurposeofgreasingshoes
So this is horrifying.
ardlaborandfrugallivingareeverywheretheindispensableconditionstoateacher'slife,andImustsay,thatIhavenoparticularwishthatitshouldbeotherwise;foritisonlythosewhoarewillingtoworkhardandlivefrugally,thateverdomuchgoodinsuchaworldasthis.
He is talking about Prussia here, but interesting note.
pensatedbygovernment,andtheirfamiliesprovidedfor,ifnecessary.Theimportanceoffemaleteachersisrecognized,andeveryencouragementisheldouttoyoungladiestoengageinthiswork.Privateteachersaresubjecttothesamerules,andthesamestrictinspection,astheteachersofpublicschools;and,whatisanimprovementonthePrussianplan,iftheteacherofaprivateschoolbecomessuperannuated,ordies,intheservice,hisfam
Pretty sure this is still Russia.
commonschoolsarenewintheRussianEmpire,andasschool-housesaretobebuiltinererypartofit,thegovernment,knowingtheimportanceofhavingthesehouseswellplannedandputup,hasappointedanarchitect,withasalaryof1000rublesayear,foreveryacademicdistrict,whosewholebusinessitistosuperintendtheerectingandfittingupofthedistrictschool-housesinhisparticularprovince.Whenwerecollecthowmanyoftheevilsofourdistrictschoolsresultfromthebadconstructionandwretchedfurnitureofourschool-houses,howcompletely,bythesedefects,theeffortsofthebestteachersmaybenullified,andthemindsandhealthofchildren,aswellastheircomfort,destroyed,wecannotbutacknowledgethistobe,foracountrywhereeverythingistobebegunfromitsfoundation,amostjudiciousarrangement.
Okay, so he does prattle about Russia in the beginning, but did he transition to American school systems at the end of this paragraph?
This headnote is really good. I love the way that this group introduced Poe, then Arthur, and then made the distinction that the two could be connected. There are a few things that could be changed or clarified, but it's solid, nonetheless!
The fact that this story is called The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket and not just “The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym” raises a lot of questions as to why maybe the title plays a role in this story being considered an american literature text.
I love the idea of citizenship here! Especially when added that he is experiencing this at sea, identity matters!
It is important that this novel is anthologized because it is a first-person narrative which gives a biased and one-sided view of the story.
I understand what you're saying, but I think that your second reason, that Poe may have "projected himself into the protagonist," is stronger. I would suggest switching these two ideas so that the stronger point is first. For ease and pleasure of reading, it just makes more sense to me.
Herman Melville, Jules Verne and many more credited American authors.
Jules Verne was French, but I completely understand. I wonder if they were inspired by Poe. Edgar was quite the popular man of his time, and his analysis of the proper way to store things in a hull (three entire pages worth of it, thank you) very much reminded me of Herman Melville.
many critics and scholars have shared their very different views on this gothic novel.
Poe himself was known to refer to it as a "silly" novel, whatever that means.
the Penguin
It's actually named The Ariel, and it was Arthur's, though nothing more than a "sail-boat" that was "worth about seventy-five dollars" (3). The Penguin is the name of the larger boat that saved Arthur and Augustus from their watery grave at sea.
that was finished and published
Was he working on more?
In general, I think that this headnote is phenomenal. I loved the analysis of Gothic literature and how Poe both introduced and utilized it. Great work!
The essence of plausibility within the novel holds a certain level of danger for the reader, as they know the events are not beyond possibility.
"The essence of plausibility." What a beautiful phrase. I think that that is what makes this story, among some of the other works by Poe, so scary. It can happen, and it has happened. There's nothing scary than what humans can be capable of.
The psychological aspect of American Gothic literature illustrated at the beginning of the voyage is also a rich example. Arthur Pym is forced to hide beneath the ship in a hold with the rest of the storage. While confined to a crate for over two weeks, Pym is left to combat his own psychological obstacles. At times, due to both physical and mental duress, he teeters on the brink of a psychological unhinging. With a lack of sufficient food and water to nourish his body and no human contact to assuage his anxious mind, Pym wonders if he has been forgotten or abandoned completely. As with any other Poe work, or even any American Gothic work, the dark and malignant side of the human psyche is used as a tool to impart readers with the same discomfort as the characters.
I love, love, love what this paragraph is trying to say about the dangers of the human mind, but I feel like the phrasing is too repetitive. It would have a much greater impact if other words than "psychological," like "subconscious" or "subjective" or "mental," were added just to break up the constant use.
According to Teen Ink, “Gothic literature was generally mysterious and ominous, filled with death and terror, used omens and foreshadowing, and showed the dark side of human nature.” All of these components are used within the novel. To name a few instances, the text is chock full of murderous executions, dismal weather, and even a note written in blood.
True to Poe's nature, of course. I love the dramatics of the phrase "written in blood." Poe really was the master of horror of his time.
Also, isn't the phrase "chock a block full," or is that just my New England brain at play?
the exploitation of the fear and paranoia of the human psyche
I love this distinction!!
He ended up dropping out of the university,
For financial reasons, a key fact in his life that would continually spur him on and drive him to the brink of insanity sometimes.
His parents died in 1812 when he was a toddler
Technically, his mother died when he was about three years old, and his father abandoned the family when Poe was an infant.
They argue that subtle variations in the sun's brightness helped trigger a drastic climate change, and that, in turn, played a role in the downfall of a whole civilization
Subtle variations
The huge green fragment of ice on which she alighted pitched and creaked as her weight came on it, but she staid there not a moment. With wild cries and desperate energy she leaped to another and still another cake; stumbling—leaping—slipping—springing upwards again! Her shoes are gone—her stockings cut from her feet—while blood marked every step; but she saw nothing, felt nothing, till dimly, as in a dream, she saw the Ohio side, and a man helping her up the bank.
Desperation
Now, I jest give yer warning,” said Haley, “I know yer; yer won’t get me to turn off this road, with all yer fussin’—so you shet up!” “Mas’r will go his own way!” said Sam, with rueful submission, at the same time winking most portentously to Andy, whose delight was now very near the explosive point.
I swear these two....
Sam tumbled up accordingly, dexterously contriving to tickle Andy as he did so, which occasioned Andy to split out into a laugh, greatly to Haley’s indignation, who made a cut at him with his riding-whip. “I ‘s ‘stonished at yer, Andy,” said Sam, with awful gravity. “This yer’s a seris bisness, Andy. Yer mustn’t be a makin’ game. This yer an’t no way to help Mas’r.”
Oh my
“Chil’en!” he said, “I’m afeard you don’t know what ye’re sayin’. Forever is a dre’ful word, chil’en; it’s awful to think on ‘t. You oughtenter wish that ar to any human crittur.”
I find the speech patterns of each slave interesting, especially among the Shelby plantation.
Here we must take our leave of her for the present, to follow the course of her pursuers.
I'm really thankful that Stowe decided to write this way. I love the suspense of seeing all sides of the conflict.
As she was also so white as not to be known as of colored lineage, without a critical survey, and her child was white also, it was much easier for her to pass on unsuspected.
Easier, but not impossible. They trained slave hunters to spot the difference, unfortunately.
If it were your Harry, mother, or your Willie, that were going to be torn from you by a brutal trader, tomorrow morning,—if you had seen the man, and heard that the papers were signed and delivered, and you had only from twelve o’clock till morning to make good your escape,—how fast could you walk? How many miles could you make in those few brief hours, with the darling at your bosom,—the little sleepy head on your shoulder,—the small, soft arms trustingly holding on to your neck?
Mothers will do ANYTHING
she strained him to her bosom with a convulsive grasp
She does that often
“O, George, for my sake, do be careful! Don’t do anything wicked; don’t lay hands on yourself, or anybody else! You are tempted too much—too much; but don’t—go you must—but go carefully, prudently; pray God to help you.”
She has such sweet, innocent concern for him.
“Well,” said Eliza, mournfully, “I always thought that I must obey my master and mistress, or I couldn’t be a Christian.” “There is some sense in it, in your case; they have brought you up like a child, fed you, clothed you, indulged you, and taught you, so that you have a good education; that is some reason why they should claim you. But I have been kicked and cuffed and sworn at, and at the best only let alone; and what do I owe? I’ve paid for all my keeping a hundred times over. I won’t bear it. No, I won’t!” he said, clenching his hand with a fierce frown.
This is so heartbreaking
It’s a free country, sir; the man’s mine,
The amount of irony in this phrase is disgusting
isn’t the man mine?”
There are so many points in this text that I wish I could articulate my feelings better, but the only feeling I frequently have is "grrrrrrrrrrrrr."
He was waited upon over the factory, shown the machinery by George, who, in high spirits, talked so fluently, held himself so erect, looked so handsome and manly, that his master began to feel an uneasy consciousness of inferiority. What business had his slave to be marching round the country, inventing machines, and holding up his head among gentlemen? He’d soon put a stop to it. He’d take him back, and put him to hoeing and digging, and “see if he’d step about so smart.” Accordingly, the manufacturer and all hands concerned were astounded when he suddenly demanded George’s wages, and announced his intention of taking him home.
How petty can you be, dude?
Still she thought she heard the trader make an offer for her boy;—could she be mistaken? Her heart swelled and throbbed, and she involuntarily strained him so tight that the little fellow looked up into her face in astonishment.
You poor dear....
Your wife might get her some ear-rings, or a new gown, or some such truck, to make up with her.”
To make up for taking her baby. Oh my god
the fact is, sir, I’m a humane man, and I hate to take the boy from his mother, sir.”
Yeah. Real humane
Hulloa, Jim Crow!” said Mr. Shelby, whistling, and snapping a bunch of raisins towards him, “pick that up, now!” The child scampered, with all his little strength, after the prize, while his master laughed. “Come here, Jim Crow,” said he. The child came up, and the master patted the curly head, and chucked him under the chin. “Now, Jim, show this gentleman how you can dance and sing.”
This makes me sick
I realized six hundred on him. Yes, I consider religion a valeyable thing in a nigger, when it’s the genuine article, and no mistake.”
Was six hundred "valuable" for the time?
You mean honest, as niggers go,” said Haley, helping himself to a glass of brandy. “No; I mean, really, Tom is a good, steady, sensible, pious fellow.
Hmmmmm.....Defensive on account of Tom, being honest, or defensive to save face?
One of the parties, however, when critically examined, did not seem, strictly speaking, to come under the species.
One of my favorite burns ever
Books were the most accessible form of entertainment.
And newspapers!
northern abolitionists
Yes, slavery was a pivotal piece of the American Civil War, but it didn't start because the North hated that the South had slaves. Conflicts of this scale are NEVER that easy. A large contributor was actually the fact that the South felt that the North ridiculed them (which is mostly true, to be honest). It was an economic and developmental issue, first and foremost. Most Northerners didn't really care about slavery. They knew it existed, and they lived in states that had outlawed it, but that didn't automatically mean that they were abolitionists. Stowe and Douglass, with their most famous works respectively, did change quite a few Northern minds (and even some slave-owning Southern ones!), but it is waaaay too bold to say that these works made the nation North v. South with slavery like some huge WWE matchup. History is never, never, never, (did I say never?) that easy.
Do what you want, screw everything else.”
I don't think that I got the same vibe from Uncle Tom's Cabin, but maybe that's just me...
Uncle Tom’s Cabin reads like a beach-read. No, it isn’t 54 pages of vague, homoerotic freestyle (“Song of Myself”).
Dude...

I just think it’s an interesting thing for an abolitionist to do. Although, I can’t say I’d do the same if I freed someone and they made the brash decision to walk right on back into the claws of danger
While I sincerely doubt that Listwell did it with passive aggressiveness in mind, I completely agree with what the author is saying.
(brave?)
My thoughts also. Though, I did take my sarcasm back after his wife got shot.
We see a dubious nature to how the slaves in “Benito Cereno” behave which clue us into the intentions of the “bad guys” (in quotes because point of view matters, but that’s a story for another time)
I still feel like I'm suffering from a mental meltdown thanks to this story.
like everything I do in life, let’s take a ride down confusion lane, shall we?
Truer words have never been said.
He has not one chance, but a hundred chances.
Like every other young white guy. 
To be great is to be misunderstood.
That's a bit dangerous to say....
hobgoblin
Such a good, underestimated word.
Infancy conforms to nobody: all conform to it
That's certainly one way to put it.
every heart vibrates to that iron string.
Is this like a cultural/societal thing that I just don't understand almost 200 years later, or does it have religious ties or something of the like?
demonstrate how this was clearly a story meant for European or colonialist eyes.
Interesting note. I won't disagree, but there are definitely more indicators that prove what type of audience this was meant for.
motivated by the pursuit of a man.
As we see in most movies and novels today. 
It doesn’t even pass the bechdel test!
I didn't even realize that! Good point!
This over-romanticized tale of star-crossed lovers from opposite sides of the world could not reek more of predictability and cliche.
That is bold! I like it!!
Princess Unca
Thought this was about Unca Eliza until I read the "she was stabbed with" part. Must be her mother!
those in positions of power see bursts of violence from minorities as unjust or unnecessary while those carrying the weight of oppression see them as battle cries for equality and freedom
We see this so much in the history of the Americas, it is almost physically painful.
This is not to say that Rowlandson’s depiction of the colonial encounter isn’t valid or worth the empathy it so easily conjures up for readers. The problem is not that Mary Rowlandson wrote about her captivity. The problem, rather, is that she—and society as a whole—deemed the context of her captivity unimportant. It did not matter that her dreadful experience was a result of a last-ditch effort by the Native Americans to cease a genocide caused by people like her. Nor did it matter that her captors did what many U.S. citizens proudly claim they would do should an invasion happen today. All that mattered was that a white woman was hurt by a group of non-white people, and that there was seemingly no viable reason for it other than inherent brutality.
Yes, yes, yes. This is a perfect example of the "woe is me" complex that we so often see from Europeans in the Americas. Thank you!!
overdose of sorrow, disillusionment and hypocrisy to the unsuspecting reader
I like this already with the use of the word "overdose."
If trouble from smaller matters begin to arise in me, I have something at hand to check myself with, and say, why am I troubled? It was but the other day that if I had had the world, I would have given it for my freedom, or to have been a servant to a Christian. I have learned to look beyond present and smaller troubles, and to be quieted under them.
Her experience was quite the attitude check; she's right about that.
Our family being now gathered together (those of us that were living)
The fact that her family was able to reunite is actually quite remarkable. That didn't often happen.
My sister’s son was redeemed for four pounds,
How on earth do you price kids? Why was Joseph more expensive?
Mr. Hoar,
Context: Mr. Hoar was the man who bought her freedom.
In my travels an Indian came to me and told me, if I were willing, he and his squaw would run away, and go home along with me.
Why do they want out?
some asked me to send them some bread, others some tobacco
Yeah, she'll totally send her captors a care package when she gets home. She'll get riiiiiiiight on that.
They would eat horse’s guts, and ears
Those poor horses. Why the ears? That just seems cruel.
the slowness, and dullness of the English army,
Those sound like fighting words.
I told them, they had as good knock me in head as starve me to death.
That was sassy!
Being very hungry I had quickly eat up mine, but the child could not bite it, it was so tough and sinewy, but lay sucking, gnawing, chewing and slabbering of it in the mouth and hand. Then I took it of the child, and eat it myself, and savory it was to my taste.
Okay, wow, no wonder the squaws hate you. I don't care how hungry you are or how painful it is to watch kids figure out how to eat something- we have natural rules against taking food from starving children. Jeez, lady.
By which I certainly understood (though I suspected it before) that whatsoever the Indians told me respecting him was vanity and lies. Some of them told me he was dead, and they had killed him; some said he was married again, and that the Governor wished him to marry; and told him he should have his choice, and that all persuaded I was dead. So like were these barbarous creatures to him who was a liar from the beginning.
Okay, so there are some natives who are pretty nasty to her. At least this time they didn't tell her that they ate her husband. I wonder if this is offering some form of humor for them.
A squaw moved it down again, at which I looked up, and she threw a handful of ashes in mine eyes.
Jeez, some of these squaws do not like her. Yikes.
I had not seen my son a pretty while, and here was an Indian of whom I made inquiry after him, and asked him when he saw him. He answered me that such a time his master roasted him, and that himself did eat a piece of him, as big as his two fingers, and that he was very good meat. But the Lord upheld my Spirit, under this discouragement; and I considered their horrible addictedness to lying, and that there is not one of them that makes the least conscience of speaking of truth.
I hope he's lying, because otherwise this is terrifying. How can any human being straight-face tell a mother something like that about her son?!
this rude fellow,
He threatened to literally gut you, and you call him rude. I can't handle this.
my master being gone, who seemed to me the best friend that I had of an Indian,
Ummmmmm.... is that why your mistress hates you?
I complained it was too heavy, whereupon she gave me a slap in the face
The men would have given her a lighter load, but the other ladies are like, "Really, girl? You can do it, honey."
I lifted up my heart to God, hoping the redemption was not far off; and the rather because their insolency grew worse and worse.
I'm not particularly religious, but this is like the modern-day equivalent of saying, "Lord, give me strength before I hurt somebody." 
was gone to the burial of a papoose
I'm pretty sure that a papoose is a baby.
He answered me “Nux,” which did much rejoice my spirit.
Does nux mean yes or no? I would think no, but an answer like that wouldn't "rejoice" her spirit, would it? I don't even know with her anymore.
I desired them that they would carry me to Albany upon one of those horses, and sell me for powder: for so they had sometimes discoursed.
Another reference to selling the women. I wonder if that ever happened. Did she escape, or was she sold back to the English?
For though I had formerly used tobacco, yet I had left it ever since I was first taken. It seems to be a bait the devil lays to make men lose their precious time. I remember with shame how formerly, when I had taken two or three pipes, I was presently ready for another, such a bewitching thing it is. But I thank God, He has now given me power over it; surely there are many who may be better employed than to lie sucking a stinking tobacco-pipe.
I mean, a simple "no" would also suffice.
It seems to be portrayed as a social thing. Interesting.
As I sat amongst them, musing of things past, my son Joseph unexpectedly came to me.
Where does this kid even come from?
King Philip
He's a Native king! Okay! I thought that they were bringing her to the English this entire time. I was so confused.
The first week of my being among them I hardly ate any thing; the second week I found my stomach grow very faint for want of something; and yet it was very hard to get down their filthy trash; but the third week, though I could think how formerly my stomach would turn against this or that, and I could starve and die before I could eat such things, yet they were sweet and savory to my taste.
She describes this in such a weird way. She's hungry and faint, but their food is disagreeable with her. Maybe she learns to stomach it? She has to be surviving on something. People can't just casually go three weeks without food.
(as I thought)
So was it because of the English army?
There were now besides myself nine English captives in this place (all of them children, except one woman)
Interesting. Women I know were held for bartering purposes, but the children could be for that, or they could have been for the purpose of acclimating them into Native society. I have read multiple accounts of that happening, as well.
One of the Indians that came from Medfield fight, had brought some plunder, came to me, and asked me, if I would have a Bible, he had got one in his basket. I was glad of it, and asked him, whether he thought the Indians would let me read? He answered, yes. So I took the Bible,
That was very kind of him. I wonder why he did that.
they had destroyed (which was at that time twenty-three)
Destroyed what? Towns, homes, human lives?
my son came to me, and asked me how I did. I had not seen him before, since the destruction of the town, and I knew not where he was, till I was informed by himself, that he was amongst a smaller parcel of Indians, whose place was about six miles off.
Well, there's my answer.
Then they went and showed me where it was, where I saw the ground was newly digged, and there they told me they had buried it.
Aside from the fact that she keeps referring to her dead child as "it," this is a rather tender moment. At least they buried her child.
God having taken away this dear child, I went to see my daughter Mary, who was at this same Indian town, at a wigwam not very far off, though we had little liberty or opportunity to see one another. She was about ten years old, and taken from the door at first by a Praying Ind. and afterward sold for a gun.
So she did have other daughters! Interesting...
I still think that if she had sons, they were sent with her husband.
by my master in this writing, must be understood Quinnapin, who was a Sagamore, and married King Philip’s wife’s sister; not that he first took me, but I was sold to him by another Narragansett Indian, who took me when first I came out of the garrison
Okay, so not God.
I must and could lie down by my dead babe, side by side all the night after.
This is such a heart-breaking image...
your master will quickly knock your child in the head
God will kill her?
sometimes one Indian would come and tell me one hour that “your master will knock your child in the head,” and then a second, and then a third, “your master will quickly knock your child in the head.” This was the comfort I had from them, miserable comforters are ye all, as he said.
They're so comforting. Jeesh.
This day there came to me one Robert Pepper (a man belonging to Roxbury) who was taken in Captain Beers’s fight
Another hostage? But a man this time...
I then remembered how careless I had been of God’s holy time; how many Sabbaths I had lost and misspent, and how evilly I had walked in God’s sight; which lay so close unto my spirit, that it was easy for me to see how righteous it was with God to cut off the thread of my life and cast me out of His presence forever
She sounds so guilty.
Indian town, called Wenimesset, northward of Quabaug
Massachusetts?
what with my own wound, and my child’s being so exceeding sick, and in a lamentable condition with her wound
So they are both wounded?
Side note: Her child is her daughter. Interesting. I wonder why she gets to keep this one. I believe that the first page said that her children and husband were taken from her. I wonder if it is because her other kids are boys. Maybe a mother and daughter were considered good, non-threatening hostages.
One of the Indians carried my poor wounded babe upon a horse; it went moaning all along, “I shall die, I shall die.” I went on foot after it, with sorrow that cannot be expressed. At length I took it off the horse, and carried it in my arms till my strength failed, and I fell down with it. Then they set me upon a horse with my wounded child in my lap, and there being no furniture upon the horse’s back, as we were going down a steep hill we both fell over the horse’s head, at which they, like inhumane creatures, laughed,
This relationship is interesting. They carry her baby for her, but when her strength fails, they allow her to ride on the horse. Yes, they laughed when she fell off, but that is undoubtedly because she was their prisoner. I want to know what they are thinking.
and having no Christian friend near me, either to comfort or help me
Is this another way of saying that she yearned for people like her? By Christian, I'm assuming that there was no way one of the "savages" could be considered good people in her eyes.
My own wound also growing so stiff
What happened?
I must turn my back upon the town, and travel with them
So they did take her hostage.
This was the dolefulest night that ever my eyes saw. Oh the roaring, and singing and dancing, and yelling of those black creatures in the night, which made the place a lively resemblance of hell. And as miserable was the waste that was there made of horses, cattle, sheep, swine, calves, lambs, roasting pigs, and fowl (which they had plundered in the town), some roasting, some lying and burning, and some boiling to feed our merciless enemies; who were joyful enough, though we were disconsolate. To add to the dolefulness of the former day, and the dismalness of the present night, my thoughts ran upon my losses and sad bereaved condition. All was gone, my husband gone (at least separated from me, he being in the Bay; and to add to my grief, the Indians told me they would kill him as he came homeward), my children gone, my relations and friends gone, our house and home and all our comforts—within door and without—all was gone (except my life), and I knew not but the next moment that might go too. There remained nothing to me but one poor wounded babe, and it seemed at present worse than death that it was in such a pitiful condition, bespeaking compassion, and I had no refreshing for it, nor suitable things to revive it.
It seems as though the natives plundered her home and took her hostage. I've read multiple accounts of such things happening before, so this is not entirely uncommon.
Now away we must go with those barbarous creatures, with our bodies wounded and bleeding, and our hearts no less than our bodies
Who is we? I assume that she is European judging by her last name, so is she stranded with other Europeans in native territory?
If the study appears easy, something is wrong-for it is truly difficult to cross the boundaries of culture and time and class and language and see the world through another's eyes.
At first, I thought that the first part of this sentence was funny (like, hahaha, story of my academic career), but then I realized just how deep this was. I could read Native legends all day and feel that I have a sense of what they are talking about, when in reality, I may never know. Understanding the life of another, especially a life so drastically different from one's own, is next to impossible. This is an important thing to remember.
Native American cultures and their respective literatures are not ornamental and historical artifacts of America's past, but are both ancient and on-going-and as complicated as those of any other of the world's peoples.
I think that this is such an important distinction to make. I see the story both ways: Native American literature could easily be considered American, because it does take place here, yet it is also distinct. It is so easy for us to forget that there are Native American communities still out there. They are significantly smaller now, but such reservations do exist. It is key to note that if we continue to segregate them like this, it will not be hard for them to declare themselves independent literary-wise. They deserve recognition for their accomplishments. After all, no one achieved it for them.
Slim Girl might well have paraphrased the famous nineteenth-century pronouncement in concluding that, for her, the only way to be a good Indian was to be a dead one.
I understand that Oliver Lafarge was a well-educated white man who studied and wrote about Natives for a majority of his life, but a line like this... It speaks volumes about American culture. I can only imagine what it would have done to a young Native American child who had stumbled upon this quote.
By far the greatest volume of fiction pertaining to Native Americans has been written about them by non-Natives. Such works have enjoyed wide and consistent popularity among the Euro-American readership for at least the past three hundred years and have spawned such diverse offshoots as Wild West Shows, cowboy and Indian movies, boy scout ceremonies, and cigar-selling statues. Disregarding the obvious propagandists for an exaggerated image of Native Americans (either savage or unearthly noble), many serious authors have attempted to cope literarily with the existence and complexity of the "Redman." Rousseau and Shakespeare (let us not forget Caliban), Fenimore Cooper and Helen Hunt Jackson (her mournful Ramona has been translated into film more times than any other novel), Faulkner and Barth have all developed, marvelled over, and almost always eventually killed off Native American characters. Still other novelists have virtually built their careers on books about "the Indian world" and how to understand it. Novels of continuing sales popularity, such as Frank Waters' The Man Who Killed the Deer (1942) wherein Hopis oft appear to be telepathic as well as paranoid regarding the outside world, Oliver LaFarge's Laughing Boy (1929), Hal Borland's When the Legends Die (1963), and Edwin Corle's Fig Tree John (1971) give testimony to the abiding fascination Euro-Americans seem to have with "their" Indians. The basic storyline of these books and of their hundreds of less successful imitators is highly formalized.
It's rather disgusting how a group so segregated against and unfairly despised can in turn be profitable to the very people who hate them. They deserve so much more than that.
A course which attempts to unite "Native American literature's greatest hits" tends to become a vain search for commonalities which logically should not be there. In the process, the individual beauties, insights, and styles of the particular litera- tures are ignored or become oversimplified, and the resulting amalgam is often a dreary and sparkless mediocrity. By presenting the breadth of indigenous literatures superficially, each one of them is done a severe disservice.
Yes, it is obvious that representation should be given everywhere, but is it so necessary for a whole new category to be made? If yes, then who says that an "outsider" should be the one compiling the list?
It seems simply to have been assumed that because: a) all natives of North America lived in North America, and b) none of them were Euro- peans, then therefore c) they must all be the same. And to carry this fascinating logic a step further, to its obvious conclusion: d) because Europeans thought they were heading towards the Asian Indies when they collided with America, and e) since Europeans were never wrong, then f) these all-the-same people must of course be INDIANS! Thus was born in the myopic minds of a few culturally traumatized and geographically disoriented individuals a new ethnic group.
If this wasn't so sad and ridiculous, European logic would actually be hilarious.
The stage was therefore set for a perplexing and, for some, traumatic, encounter when trans-Atlantic contacts became protracted and formalized. Native Americans, quite familiar and at ease with the realities of cultural pluralism, were in a sense pre-adapted to regard the sudden appearance of "new" people with equanimity, and the historical record testifies that initially they did just that. Early-arriving Euro- peans were hosted and fed and sheltered and studied; they were regarded as neither gods nor demons, and their appearance probably did not seem more than a mildly interesting event to the ordinary Native American citizen. To the European ventur- ing for the first time beyond the cocoon of cultural similitude, however, the "discov- ery" of "Indians" in the Americas was a major event indeed. Almost invariably the explorers' first reaction was one of irrational denial. Surely these quintessentially un-European creatures (no clothes, no crosses, etc.) could not be human. Perhaps they were a new species of ape; perhaps manifested devils . . . but certainly not souls!
How peculiar. The Natives were not that surprised to see the Europeans, as I'm sure that they had experience in "cultural pluralism," and so they treated the white men as they would any other guest. I wonder what type of fear or hatred had to settle in the Europeans' hearts in order for them to scoff at people who showed them such care and hospitality. This is precisely like the old legend of the bear stealing the goods of the badgers.
If there had ever been a North American language called "Indian," the mode of communication within a society called "Indian," then there would undoubtedly be something appropriately labeled "Indian literature."
Is "Indian Literature" not a thing? Not even for works originating from India? "Native" seems to be the better word here, because there is a key distinction between "Indians" and "Native Americans."
"A cat! a cat!" cried other mice as they scrambled out of holes both large and snug. Noiseless they ran away into the dark.
I hope they got away. Is the lesson "constant vigilance," or what? It seems more like a "be aware of your surroundings" thing, but the message just seems murky.
The Iktomi children hurried away from the creek, crying and calling for their water-dead father.
Is he actually dead, or will he come back? I'm just surprised he even has offspring. He's a bit like Norse mythology's Loki... I wonder if they have other similarities. The stories of Iktomi seem to be warnings for young aborigine children, so perhaps Loki and Iktomi are more similar than I thought. Is it normal to have a trickster in folklore, or did Natives somehow have access to such Norse tales? Interesting...
Gazing full into the black bear's face, he said: "I come to do justice. You have returned only a knife to my poor father. Now return to him his dwelling." His voice was deep and powerful. In his black eyes burned a steady fire. The long strong teeth of the bear rattled against each other, and his shaggy body shook with fear. "Ahow!" cried he, as if he had been shot. Running into the dwelling he gasped, breathless and trembling, "Come out, all of you! This is the badger's dwelling. We must flee to the forest for fear of the avenger who carries the magic arrow." Out they hurried, all the bears, and disappeared into the woods. Singing and laughing, the badgers returned to their own dwelling. Then the avenger left them. "I go," said he in parting, "over the earth."
Full credit for this idea goes to the user "ielasser101," but I did want to expand on it.
This book, according to its synopsis, is full of children's tales. These stories were supposed to teach lessons, both of morals, but perhaps also of history and hope. I agree that the badgers, those peaceful and proficient at living the way they do, could represent the Native Americans. In turn, the black bears, large and mean with impressive ways of self-defense, could easily represent white men. That leaves the avenger, the man born from the badger. Maybe, depending on what tribe this tale originated from, they believed in some sort of divine being who would drive the white men away. The badgers showed the bear nothing but kindness and hospitality, but once the bear felt comfortable enough, he overtook the badgers' land. This is entirely like what happened between Natives and white men. Maybe creating this tale and imagining a sort of divine helper to drive the terrible freeloaders from their land was the Natives' way of keeping hope that one day the white men would be gone.
Thus with his own hands he aids in making his grave.
Yikes. I suppose he should have been happy with the transformations he had.
There seems to be a common theme of admonishing children from selfishness and greed in these stories.
The muskrat stood smiling. On his lips hung a ready "Yes, my friend," when Iktomi would ask, "My friend, will you sit down beside me and share my food?" That was the custom of the plains people. Yet Iktomi sat silent. He hummed an old dance-song and beat gently on the edge of the pot with his buffalo-horn spoon. The muskrat began to feel awkward before such lack of hospitality and wished himself under water.
Talk about breaching social norms, Iktomi. When will you learn?
Then his blunted sense will surprise you, little reader; for instead of being grieved that he had taken back his blanket, he cried aloud, "Hin-hin-hin! If only I had eaten the venison before going for my blanket!"
Selfishness gets you nowhere.
He had seen the prairie put on a snow-white blanket and then change it for a bright green robe more than a thousand times.
I'm obsessed with this imagery.
While sitting a prisoner on the tree he spied, through his tears, a pack of gray wolves roaming over the level lands. Waving his hands toward them, he called in his loudest voice, "He! Gray wolves! Don't you come here! I'm caught fast in the tree so that my duck feast is getting cold. Don't you come to eat up my meal." The leader of the pack upon hearing Iktomi's words turned to his comrades and said: "Ah! hear the foolish fellow! He says he has a duck feast to be eaten! Let us hurry there for our share!" Away bounded the wolves toward Iktomi's lodge. From the tree Iktomi watched the hungry wolves eat up his nicely browned fat ducks. His foot pained him more and more. He heard them crack the small round bones with their strong long teeth and eat out the oily marrow. Now severe pains shot up from his foot through his whole body. "Hin-hin-hin!" sobbed Iktomi. Real tears washed brown streaks across his red-painted cheeks. Smacking their lips, the wolves began to leave the place, when Iktomi cried out like a pouting child, "At least you have left my baking under the ashes!" "Ho! Po!" shouted the mischievous wolves; "he says more ducks are to be found under the ashes! Come! Let us have our fill this once!"
What a peculiar way of saying that honesty is brutal. I wonder if the lesson to be learned here is that those who play others will in turn be played. Karma, man.
aborigine
n. a person, animal, or plant who has been in a country or region since the earliest times
Iktomi is a wily fellow. His hands are always kept in mischief. He prefers to spread a snare rather than to earn the smallest thing with honest hunting. Why! he laughs outright with wide open mouth when some simple folk are caught in a trap, sure and fast. He never dreams another lives so bright as he. Often his own conceit leads him hard against the common sense of simpler people.
This says volumes about the character, and adds some heavy foreshadowing of what's to come.