Social media can significantly affect our emotions and mental state, often through mechanisms like social comparison or the dopamine-driven feedback loops associated with likes and shares. Awareness of how your data is collected, used, and potentially sold is important. Privacy settings and terms of service should be understood to protect your data from misuse.

This critique regularly surfaces in discussions about technology and innovation. It's a reminder that the process of creation carries with it a responsibility to foresee and mitigate negative consequences. As inventors and developers, it's important to engage with ethical considerations proactively and integrate them into the design and deployment of new technologies.

In my opinion, English is often the language of international business, and as software development is a global industry, English serves as a common ground for collaboration. English technical terms are widely adopted even in non-English speaking countries, so even non-native English speakers are familiar with the necessary technical English to code.

I think the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a regulation in EU law on data protection and privacy in the European Union and the European Economic Area. It also addresses the transfer of personal data outside the EU and EEA areas. The GDPR aims primarily to give individuals individuals control over their personal data and to simplify the regulatory environment for international business by unifying the regulation within the EU.

The pressure to maintain this curated persona can have profound effects on individuals' mental health and well-being. The constant need for validation, measured through likes, shares, and comments, can lead to a sense of perpetual inadequacy and anxiety. Furthermore, this dynamic can exacerbate feelings of isolation and disconnection from one's authentic self, as the line between public persona and private identity becomes increasingly blurred.

Jacquet's perspective suggests that shame can be an effective mechanism for social change, particularly when traditional power structures fail to address injustices or unethical behavior. By publicly calling out harmful actions or policies, the weak can leverage public opinion to pressure the strong into change. This public exposure and the subsequent desire to avoid societal disapproval can motivate powerful individuals or entities to alter their behaviors or policies.

This situation underscores the challenges social media platforms face in moderating content and the complex nature of online discourse. It also points to the tactics used by certain groups or individuals who seek to manipulate public opinion by targeting high-profile figures with negative content.

Social media, while fostering global connections, also enables new forms of harassment, amplifying traditional bullying into cyber realms where anonymity emboldens malicious behavior. Methods exploit digital platforms to intimidate and control victims, infringing on their privacy and safety. This digital harassment necessitates robust responses from both social media platforms and legal systems to protect individuals and maintain the integrity of online spaces.

I have often heard about cyberbullying. It involves organized efforts by groups to target individuals with a barrage of negative, often abusive messages. This can be particularly damaging when it involves sensitive personal information or threats.

In my opinion, during natural disasters or emergencies, social media platforms can be used to communicate safety instructions, updates on the situation, and locations of shelters or resources. This immediacy and reach are unparalleled compared to traditional media.

platforms like Twitter and Facebook had policies that granted certain exemptions to political leaders from their standard content moderation rules. The rationale behind this approach was the belief that speech from political figures is inherently newsworthy and in the public interest, even if it violates the platforms' rules that would typically result in content removal or account suspension for ordinary users.

Facebook uses advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to automatically detect and sometimes remove content that violates its policies. This technology is particularly useful for identifying and acting on certain types of violations at scale, such as spam, terrorist propaganda, hate speech, and more, before they are widely seen or reported by users.

Emphasizing data gathering suggests a scientific approach to understanding social media's impacts. Longitudinal studies, in particular, would be invaluable in tracking the long-term effects on mental health, social skills, identity formation, and worldviews. This data can guide more informed policies and interventions.

The constant barrage of notifications, messages, and updates can lead to overstimulation, where our brains are continuously bombarded with information. This overstimulation can paradoxically lead to numbness, as we become desensitized to the content we consume, struggling to find genuine excitement or interest.

This is one of the most mysterious and scientific parts of a gene's origin. We can see the traces of natural selection in our own bodies and lives, like sleeping at night or eating ripe food. By selecting the best way to live over millions of years, we come up with the modern living style.

This is one of the most important parts of the origin of our genes. We basically create our bodies, determine our behaviors, and also choose the best way to live based on this part of our genes. That's why we have some similarities with our parents.

I notice that, excluding information that fits my personal tastes, I will receive some random heated discussions or breaking news that will be sent to every user by the social media sites. But the fact is that I don't normally care about this stuff. It's suspicious for these sites that they want to create public opinion for political ends, which definitely brings bad user experiences and negative social impacts to the social community online.

I never think about this aspect. I can imagine what evil things will happen after malicious users figure out how to control the stream of network flow. They will take all chances, creating heated and inflammatory discussions, waving the bloody shirts.

I remember those blind people saying that the iPhone was the most convenient phone for them. The apps for blind people are the most well-designed in IOS systems.

I used to think that ADHD was a kind of happy disease because people often had things to do and fun to enjoy. And I have seen many YouTubers say that they have ADHD, and this disease causes disorders in their lives and seriously influences their lives. At that time, I realized that even ADHD would seriously impact people's lives and accessibilities.

Sometimes bad things happen, not because we meant to do them. But we can't predict everything bad that will happen around us, especially when we deal with tons of unknown stuff on the internet.

Privacy is important for most of our daily social media posts and information exchanges. Neglecting privacy protections may lead to many unexpected problems. The location is one of the most essential pieces of information. If we let thousands of strangers know about our address, our private properties and our body safeties will be seriously threatened.

Although this reason seems fair, it will lead to internet bullying easily. People who saw the trolling posts and have no critical thinking will be incited to cyber-violate someone without questioning the authenticity of the posts or the real purpose for the author to post.

This reason can explain many instances of trolling. Many people spread inauthentic information and create heated discussions to attract attention, which they don't achieve in the real world. It's similar to the case where babies cry to attract their parents' attention.

It's true that anonymity encourages inauthentic behavior. If someone want to gain attentions from other because in real life this individual lives in a normal and boring life, this individual can just start up a social account and copy-paste the real rich people's sharing. People who don't know the truth will think that this man is the real rich people and then follow the account under a totally fake name. In fact, all the things this individual showed are fake or copied from others.

This is a new term for me. But this term reminds me of a short period of me being a big fan of black pink. I love this band so much that I watch their posts and videos whatever I do. I even have a feeling that I am a good friend of Lisa because I knew her so well and she was such a essential part of my life. However, this feeling ends when I really saw them in real world. I was reminded that we were just strangers.

I thought that texting is an ancient way to send messages. I didn't expect that there were so many other methods to send messages before SMS. In nowadays people prefer social media messages to chat with friends and their text messages boxes were full of advertisement and meaningless notifications. This transformation makes me curious about when the next big change happen in sending messages leading the current social media to be outdated.

This is such a repeated history happen in human information journey. Since the internet and online social media becomes common and popular after primary school, whenever I hear about some incredible information, I will question about the authentication of the information because there are so many rumors going virus on internet.

This is my first time to know that different systems might count the same sentence with different numbers. The simplifying question improve efficiency for understanding and statistics, but the losing part may contain essential meanings as well.

This is an interesting and common phenomenon. If a random sentence includes precise data and numerical description, it's easier for people to trust than other normal sentences. But the fact is that number can be fabricated and Digital information has nothing to do with authenticity.

This happens often in our life. We are often trapped in information cocoons. When we see some inflammatory comments and one-sided comments, we think that there are many people who support our opinions, which makes us more blindly cling to the ideas in our hearts. But in fact this is a kind of rhetoric and means, real life is not as we think.

I think it's a very funny and ironic story. I think this is a performance art that satirizes the dual nature of people daring to express themselves and fearing authority in protest. It also means that systems of government and security can be broken by witty ideas.

I think this is a frame that often mentions in nowadays. The natural rights is the basic right for every human. And the establishment of natural rights might lead to the liberation of slaves and women rights.

Taoism is widely used in nowadays when we are eager to reach a goal. I prefer Taoism than Confucianism because Taoism is for one's own good but Confucianism is for governors or empires' good.