Fong Yue Ting v. United States
anti Chinese immigration policy lead to this suit
Fong Yue Ting v. United States
anti Chinese immigration policy lead to this suit
It initiated what can be called an era of steadily increasing restrictions on immigration of all kinds that would last for sixty-one years.
shift in policy
suspending the immigration of Chinese laborers for twenty years.
Crazy to see this happen so long ago and with COVID-19 there is anti-Chinese rhetoric. Has our country learned anything from its racist past?
white persons and to aliens of African nativity and persons of African descent."
As opposed to the wikipedia article, this one focuses on the origins and history of US immigration policy
Burlingame Treaty
the first and last time the US recognized a universal right to immigrate
Immigration first became a special subject for diplomatic negotiation during the long run-up to the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.
When immigration first became an issue across countries
the first naturalization act, limiting those eligible to "free white persons."
shows the history of immigration policy
Cold War imperatives plus a growing tendency toward more egalitarian attitudes about ethnic and racial
how outlook on immigration changed
an integral part of the American polity
begins with how immigration has been prevalent since the beginning
high numbers of racial minorities among crime suspects
clear within society today
As immigration rises, native workers are pushed into less demanding jobs, which improves native workers' health outcomes.[287][288]
how immigrants taking higher risk jobs positively impacts natives
Europe
this article discusses immigrations impact on different countries rather than just the Untied States and how its impacted us
a very broad look at immigration
Immigrants have been linked to greater invention and innovation
highlights the power of immigration on other countries
A slight reduction in the barriers to labor mobility between the developing and developed world would do more to reduce poverty in the developing world than any remaining trade liberalization.[191]
ability of developing and developed world have to help poverty
A 2021 study in the American Economic Journal found that undocumented immigrants had beneficial effects on the employment and wages of American natives.
strict immigration policy leads to less jobs for the undocumented and worse employment and wages for American natives
What does that say about the state of immigration in our country today?
Legalization, instead, decreases the unemployment rate of low-skilled natives and increases income per native."
impact of legalization of undocumented immigrants
refugees to the United States brought in $63 billion more in government revenues than they cost the government.
another way in which immigrants are contributing to this country rather than harming it
A 2017 paper by Evans and Fitzgerald found that refugees to the United States pay "$21,000 more in taxes than they receive in benefits over their first 20 years in the U.S
Contributing just as much to US government
By increasing overall demand, immigrants could push natives out of low-skilled manual labor into better paying occupations
contrary to the popular opinion here that immigrants are stealing the opportunities and jobs of "americans"
Research also suggests that diversity and immigration have a net positive effect on productivity[112][113][91][114][115] and economic prosperity.[
how immigration affects the work place
They can also mean net loss for a poor donor country through the loss of the educated minority—a "brain drain".
Why impoverished countries continue to stay this way
What can we do about this? Can we blame those with a higher education seeking a better opportunity for themselves for this issue?
As of 2003[update], family reunification accounted for approximately two-thirds of legal immigration to the US every year.
Wow i was not aware of this. Made me want to narrow my focus on this topic of immigration as family reunification and how our last president handled this situation was such a big issue
the freedom only applies to movement within national borders and the ability to return to one's home state.[60][61]
shows why so many immigrants traveling to an entirely different country are treated so poorly
natural and social barriers
aside from the the legal process making immigration difficult, there are also natural and social barriers
even more of a reason to not immigrate but yet there are still thousands and thousands of immigrants
persecution (religious and otherwise), frequent abuse, bullying, oppression, ethnic cleansing, genocide, risks to civilians during war, and social marginalization.[
there are clearly numerous reasons for people to leave their country. By explaining different reasons you get a better understanding of why there are so many immigrants and why it has grown so much over the years
immigration are sometimes mandatory in a contract of employment:
availability of jobs is the related pull factor.
differentials in wage rates are common
Push and pull factors of immigration
Why do people want to immigrate in the first place?
Nearly half (43%) of all international migrants originate in Asia
by showing stats from different countries you can see how immigration impacts the rest of the world
number of international migrants has reached 244 million worldwide,
the increase and prevalence of this issue
international movement of people to a destination country of which they are not natives or where they do not possess citizenship in order to settle as permanent residents or naturalized citizens.
Answers what is Immigration?