3 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2021
    1. Leadership has been described “in essence, a process: a series of actions and interactions among leaders and followers which lead to the attainment of group goals”

      This reminds me of a quote by a late mentor of mine: "Success is the attainment of goals you create for yourself." - Howard Terry

      Wren's definition of leadership is the actions and interactions of success. This is similar to my working definition thus far. I haven't thought about Mr. Terry in many years, but can see through my working definition of leadership that his influence played a role in how I view success and leadership in my own life.

    2. In the United States, many researchers favored the notion that leaders were born and not made.

      This sounds like nationalism and classism disguised as leadership research. The divide in leadership almost directly reflects other systemic issues of class, gender, sexual orientation, race, etc. I love courses like this one for open dialogue for these issues. Dr. Hedrick, thank you for making intentional effort to allow these conversations to happen.

    3. William James asserted that great men needed assistance with talents necessary to meet the needs of the situation. “Personal-situation leadership to be understood demands attention be paid to (1) the traits and motives of the leader as a man (2) images that selected publics hold of him and their motives for following him (3) the features of the role that he plays as a leader, and (4) the institutional context in which he and his followers may be involved”

      This is some heavily male-centered language. I think of this story often, but there is a teacher that started using her "default" pronouns as she/her within examples, stories, etc. and found that the young women in her class perked up immediately. Perhaps, leadership has been male-centric because the language for years has conditioned us to believe that is the default.