25 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2025
    1. This article should serve as a comprehensive picture of howsocial media and the internet impacts children and exposes themto financial exploitation and labor abuse by those they trust themost.

      restates thesis and claims mentioned throughout article

    2. s and pays herself fifteen to twenty percentout of Sparkle’s earnings for her role as a manager.111 Luckily forSparkle, her mother distributes the rest of her earnings to anexternal manager, charity, bus

      reasoning backing up claim

    3. Ryan’s parents want him to have as normal a childhood aspossible and prioritize his education over any of his work.106

      Shows another POV, how not all of these channels are/have to be "bad"

    4. legislatures refuse to recognize the work kidfluencers are doingwhen creating content for social media platforms.

      Shows how people overlook kids and the hard work they put into these videos, and how just because they are kids they should not be treated like that

    5. Without theseprotections, kidfluencers do not have any legal rights to theirearnings and are subject to exploitation by their parents andemployers without any legal recourse.7

      Reveals how harsh reality is for some of these influencers, brings a new POV to the readers

    6. e blocked trust account, however, a court mayorder more to be set aside.26 Additionally, all earnings of anunemancipated minor related to a contract defined in Section6750 of California’s Family Code “shall remain the sole legalproperty of the minor child,” not just the fifteen percent depositedin Coogan Trust Accounts.27

      Whole section explains exactly how laws work with money kids earn and how it works to give reader background information to refer to as they read on

    7. Thus,kidfluencers need to be protected from their parents and theindustry the same way child actors are.

      Main Claim: "Kidfluencers" and kids in family vlogs need to be protected from labor abuse and exploitation.

    8. Some argue that just because the children areearning money does not necessarily mean creating contentshould be considered work

      Counterargument already, followed by a concession

    1. Smith would ask questions about his body and his transition that "hinted at being ... sexual, a little inappropriate," he said in Bad Influence.

      Topic I can mention as bad side effects of channels

    2. In Bad Influence: The Dark Side of Kidfluencing, Netflix sheds light on what many described as Tiffany Smith's abuse of underage content creators, who once collaborated with the single mom and her daughter, Piper Rockelle.

      Briefly shows what author will be talking about through the rest of her article/main claim?? (Don't think it would be considered as a claim but..)

    1. The Stauffer Life is a YouTube channel created in 2013,

      Their form of evidence/reasoning to prove their claims (Which is a popular family YouTube channel with positive outcomes)

    2. Vlogging allows audience from all around the world to witness the Stauffer family’s life journey, the audience may feel as if they know the family personally by following up their new uploads, and become part of their journey through online interactions.

      Restating claims

    3. Not only vlogging provides families an easily accessible way for life narrating, it also allows the family to gain recognition by interacting with enormously large number of audience.

      Another claim: Vlogging can be helpful in providing a communicable space for not only the families creating the videos, but also viewers.

    4. The Stauffer couple make part of their household income from vlogging.

      Another reason Vlogging can be important because it can provide another source of income to families.

    5. it has become a new form of life narrative that allows families to quickly engage with audience from all around the world, and invite the “viewers” to witness meaningful moments and significant events in their lives.

      Main claim: Saying how society can benefit from family YouTube channels because the viewers can experience new cultures and engage with people from around the world