We don't know if these allegations are against him or his wife- this is the only article that highlights this though.

Saying this couldn't possibily be an attack against Trump

Not much of a narrative in this article because there is not much information to be had.

New Orleans connection

The first time that I've seen anyone else involved in the article that is not the police, FBI, or Musk

Terrorist attack narrative, not the troubled soldier narrative.

connection between New Orleans and LV

Terrorist attack narrative.

This article investigates the connections, where every other article said that they have nothing to do with one another.

First article that I've come across that mentions this.

Connection between this incident and the New Orleans incident narrative continues. Have yet to say that there is no correlation.

PTSD narrative

No shot mentioned

Blames the Cybertruck

Relating to New Orleans right away.

Another instance that blames the Tesla for exploding and killing someone right away. The article should say later that it was not actually the truck that did it, and that the man committed suicide, but this headline does not make that clear at all.

Saying the Cybertruck is great narrative. Giving free advertising for the prices as well.

Contributes to the terrorist attack narrative, highlighting the fact that this was a Tesla in front of a Trump hotel, where the two work together, and the article shows that.

Still leaves room for the possibility that there is a link. Other sources close this completely.

Continues the narrative of the troubled soldier and mental illness is the highlight.

Comes later, why did they elude to the fact that the explosion killed him in the first sentence?

Saying that the person died from the explosion, other sources say that this person died from suicide.

Continued narrative of praising Musk and his products.

Shifting the blame to the rental car company.

Praise of Elon Musk, who can be controversial.

Narrative of praising the Cybertruck, that it is something that can protect yourself and others around you.

Reason why the person is not highlighted as being an army man, is because they have yet to determine who this person was. This could mean that the earlier the article was released, the more likely that they believe this was a terrorist attack based on the location and use of the Tesla.

Something all of the articles can agree upon.

Something that comes up quicker than other articles that I've read.

Talking about the truck itself exploding, no mention of who the driver actually was. This is different from the previous articles that I've read, where the fact that he was an Army man was the first thing mentioned. This is shifting the blame to more of the truck.

In this article, the authors talk about how this doesn't have a connection upon bringing up the New Orleans incident, where other articles have let the reader read about the incident first, possibly eluding to the fact that it's up to the reader's interpretation on whether or not the two are connected.

Highlighting that this is something that happened legally, which could have been assumed, even if they didn't say legally.

This talks about the event having a suspect, meaning that there was a crime involved.

This took until some of the last things that are highlighted in the article, where for others, it is the first. This article makes it seem like the others are insignificant to the story.

This seems to be debunked as quickly as this narrative arose, that they could have something to do with each other, much different than what other articles have said.

Struggling with mental health narrative.

Showing that this man was a good person, the article in no way talks about how this may have been a criminal act, much different than other articles.

Not a criminal in this narrative

This word makes it seem that the explosion was impressive

Already shows the significance of who he was, contributing to the narrative of a victim of PTSD. The headline seems to elude to the fact that the soldier was the victim in the scenario, to suicide, nothing of the people that were injured from explosion is mentioned in the headline.

Speculation, crafting the narrative.

Crafting the narrative as to how this may be related to a terrorisim attack and how the Tesla connects to the Trump hotel.

What's interesting is that the reader gets the facts about what actually happened after we hear what the FBI said about the investigation.

This is something that is speculation from people involved in the case, and can invoke emotion in the readers, like fear.

Right away, I was thinking about the news values, and why this might be something that is worth learning about The fact that this says that this is national news, lets me know that this is something that is involving people that are relevant to the United States, and is something that is out of the ordinary.

A play on the show itself and also the metaphor of overlooking flaws in someone else.

War/violence metaphor

War metaphor

The second time that the author has used this word. Many people likely consider blowout meaning different things. In my opinion, I don't think that the Packers won in a blowout, since they only won by ten points. However, other people have a different concept of this word in terms of a football game.

Informed opinion- "perfect" is subjective.

Opinion included from Kraft that one, believes that Rodgers left a legacy, but also that Jordan is fulfilling that legacy.

Every quote and opinion that is showed in this article is from the side that believes that Love is a great player. Everyone that is attributed thinks that Love did all the right things, but there are definitely people and players out there that think the opposite, but this is not shown in this article.

First sentence is an informed opinion or speculation because Love didn't come out and say these things, but there was evidence of this from last night's game.

Opinion- not necessarily the author's opinion, but their colleagues, who are people who are working for the New York Times, who extremely likely to be people who are not experts in art museum robberies.

This news is not something that is near to us or NYC at all, but is something that has been all over my news feed and social media feeds. Why this was in the news is likely largely due to the unusualness of the matter, that one of the most famous art museums in the art capital of the world was broken into, and is a place that is known to have lots of security in general. That leads to the next point of the prominence of the story, and how whether you are interested in art or not, almost everyone in America has heard of The Louvre, or at least some of the art that is in the museum, like the Mona Lisa.

This article may have come from a public relations statement about the robbery in general, but not necessarily as a way to promote the museum in general, since hearing about a robbery may make people feel that they are unsafe while being at the museum, and that there isn't enough security.

This wording sounds similar to an opinion rather than fact, where they are assuming what the reader is thinking.

This is interesting to say because how does this author know this? The thieves didn't say that they were specifically not looking for oil art pieces, but just that they went after the jewels first.