, not a real resource cost,
remove
, not a real resource cost,
remove
Suppose he owns a fraction αd of the firm on the receiving ("destination") side of a transferOverføring. A payment or shift of resources between parties that does not affect total surplus because gains and losses cancel out. and a smaller fraction αs of the firm on the paying ("source") side. Shifting value X from the source to the destination — by mispricing a contract between them — yields him a private gain of roughly B≈X(αd−αs). He loses αsX as a shareholderAksjonær. An owner of shares in a corporation who bears residual risk and has voting rights. of the source firm but gains αdX as a shareholderAksjonær. An owner of shares in a corporation who bears residual risk and has voting rights. of the destination firm; the net, X(αd−αs), is positive precisely b
use real numbers rather than X aplha B etc. make the example concrete
or each i∈{1,2}, there exists a data-ge
I think this formulation is awkward. any more elegant way of stating it formally without the i and j stuff?
model must learn two mapping
Why must it learn two mappings? maybe this statement is wrong
which is the type channel.
this could depend on settings. maybe for some settings the evidence mapping is very easy, but not a simple mapping from types. so make this less strong statements