5 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Suppose he owns a fraction αd of the firm on the receiving ("destination") side of a transferOverføring. A payment or shift of resources between parties that does not affect total surplus because gains and losses cancel out. and a smaller fraction αs of the firm on the paying ("source") side. Shifting value X from the source to the destination — by mispricing a contract between them — yields him a private gain of roughly B≈X(αd−αs). He loses αsX as a shareholderAksjonær. An owner of shares in a corporation who bears residual risk and has voting rights. of the source firm but gains αdX as a shareholderAksjonær. An owner of shares in a corporation who bears residual risk and has voting rights. of the destination firm; the net, X(αd−αs), is positive precisely b

      use real numbers rather than X aplha B etc. make the example concrete

  2. Mar 2026
    1. or each i∈{1,2}, there exists a data-ge

      I think this formulation is awkward. any more elegant way of stating it formally without the i and j stuff?

    2. which is the type channel.

      this could depend on settings. maybe for some settings the evidence mapping is very easy, but not a simple mapping from types. so make this less strong statements

    Annotators