3 Matching Annotations
  1. Aug 2025
    1. Let’s face it, very few people read the “terms and conditions,” or the “terms of use” agreements prior to installing an application (app). These agreements are legally binding, and clicking “I agree” may permit apps (the companies that own them) to access your: calendar, camera, contacts, location, microphone, phone, or storage, as well as details and information about your friends.  While some applications require certain device permissions to support functionality—for example, your camera app will most likely need to access your phone’s storage to save the photos and videos you capture—other permissions are questionable. Does a camera app really need access to your microphone? Think about the privacy implications of this decision.

      This section could spark a powerful class discussion on persuasion and critical reading. “Terms and conditions” are often ignored, yet they’re written in legal, complex language that masks significant privacy trade-offs. In English class, I could use real app agreements as nonfiction texts for rhetorical analysis. Who’s the audience? What’s the tone? How is consent being shaped or assumed? This would also build students’ media literacy by helping them question what they’re agreeing to and why.

    2. Content or information on social media that may hurt your chance of being hired includes: Inappropriate or provocative pictures, videos, or comments. Evidence of drinking or using recreational drugs. Discriminatory comments. Negative or overly critical comments about previous employers or co-workers. Evidence of sub-par communication skills.

      This list would make a great discussion starter in a high school English class, especially when we talk about ethos and credibility. It’s a real-world example of how communication (tone, content, even grammar) can affect how others perceive you. I could see using this list to help students evaluate sample social media posts and consider how their own digital presence contributes to or undermines the persona they want to build. It also offers a bridge to teach professionalism and code-switching across contexts.

    3. Poorly thought out, inappropriate, or offensive messages on social media can have serious consequences.

      As a high school English teacher, I see how much students underestimate the permanence and impact of their words, especially online. I think this is a great opportunity to tie digital citizenship into lessons on rhetoric, tone, and audience. We analyze speeches and literature in class, so why not help students apply those same critical thinking skills to their own digital expression? Maybe we could even revise real or hypothetical posts through the lens of rhetorical effectiveness and social impact.