It has nothing to do with correct grammar and syntax, which are of no importance so long as one makes one’s meaning clear
What we've been talking about in class, clarity is the most important.
It has nothing to do with correct grammar and syntax, which are of no importance so long as one makes one’s meaning clear
What we've been talking about in class, clarity is the most important.
political regeneration
I can follow is argument about the degradation of language, but I'm curious as to how this effects politics and the economy.
It becomes ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language
I don't know how established this is, but I find the claimed connection between the preciseness of our language and the quality of our actual thoughts to be very interesting. Does language actually allow one to think better?
It follows that any struggle against the abuse of language is a sentimental archaism, like preferring candles to electric light or hansom cabs to aeroplanes.
This is an interesting point. Is the english language getting worse? When I read something written a long time ago I find it hard to understand, because it's less familiar to me. So is it getting worse or is it just changing? The problem is that anyone would say their language is just fine because it's what they're most comfortable with, so it's hard to compare.
The smallest of the URF's (URFA6L) has been identified as the animal equivalent of the recently discovered yeast H+-ATPase subunit 8 gene.
It's shocking how much easier this is to read
Subject-Verb Separation
This seems like too simple of a fix, I'm curious to see how it changes the paragraph.
If these structural expectations are continually violated, readers are forced to divert energy from understanding the content of a passage to unraveling its structure.
This explanation makes it clear that the goal is to make the reading as effortless as possible for the reader. We don't want them "diverting energy," we want whatever energy they have to be available for understanding.
Improving the quality of writing actually improves the quality of thought.
I think this is a very important point. Not only will better writing convey your thoughts better, it will actually make your thoughts better!
I like to print out the paper and highlight the most relevant information, so on a quick rescan I can be reminded of the major points
This is something I haven't tried, but I would like to. It also might help me feel more organized and follow along better.
I also always look at plots/figures, as they help me get a first impression of a paper
I think I'm still at the stage where even the plots and figures just confuse me.
I go back into the technical details to clarify any questions I might have.
I've heard of people doing similar things. Does anyone ever read the whole thing?
You'd call it a badly written article
Are scientific research papers badly written? Is the appropriate genre to write poorly?
What the hell? Was that abstract supposed to explain something?
This article is so funny cause these are the exact steps I've gone through
Most importantly, if I didn't understand a word in a sentence, I forbade myself from proceeding to the next sentence until I looked it up in a textbook and then reread the sentence until it made sense.
I had a teacher that recommended this, and I think it would be extremely helpful, but its really hard to do. We're all busy (or maybe just a little lazy) and that could turn a 30 minute read into several hours
people do not label a particular story as a joke solely because of formalfeatures but rather because of their perception of the rhetorical actionthat is occurring”
I never thought about something as simple as a joke being a particular genre, but it's true, and something about it that I can't quite pick apart lets everyone around you know what's going on, most of the time.
if each writing problem were to requirea completely new assessment of how to respond, writing would beslowed considerably
Not sure if everyone learned the same thing in American Heritage as me, but this definitely relates to pragmatism.
I should make you aware of my own struggleswith writing in a new genre.
It's very interesting and helpful to see how the writer struggles in deciding how to write in this genre, or how he should address this audience.
I immediately called on my genre knowledge—my past expe-rience with reading and writing similar texts in similar situations—toorient me to the expectations of this genre”
In thinking about where genres come from I was reminded about something I read about how the human brain works. It was something about how it records successes or failures in a certain situation so that it can either correct or act the same the next time it's in that situation. Maybe that led to genres; someone had success in addressing a specific audience in a certain way, so they did the same thing the next time, and the next time until this pattern formed.
so you’ve ignored the potential benefits to your current situation as university students.
I think another relevant thing here is what the student's goal is. We talked a bit about this in class, but some students just want to get the paper/assignment done in the shortest time and with the least effort. They probably won't use this process because it's not a requirement like it was in high school. They may not even consider that it's worth writing the best paper they can and considering strategies to help them do so.
But Lauren wasn’t intimidated by the length; she worked on it a bit at a time when she was able, knowing that it would be done someday.
As a physics major I don't think I've gotten over the fear of long page requirements, but maybe I can learn from the strategies of a seven-year-old.