3 Matching Annotations
  1. Jun 2024
    1. Now, some peeps gone say this illustrate how Fish be rite, why we need to beteachin mo standard grammar and stuff. If you look at it from Fish view, yeah itmean that. But if you look at it from my view, it most certainly dont mean that.Instead, it mean that the one set of rules that people be applyin to everybody’sdialects leads to perceptions that writers need “remedial training” or that speakersof dialects are dumb.

      Young argues that using one set of rules for everyone unfairly judges non-standard speakers as less capable. He suggests language should be taught in a way that respects different styles.

    2. This explain why so many bloggers on Fish’s NYT comment page was tryin toschool him on why teachin one correct way lend a hand to choppin off folks’tongues.But, let me be fair to my man Stan. He prolly unware that he be supportin languagediscrimination, cuz he appeal to its acceptable form–standard language ideology alsocalled “dominant language ideology” (Lippi-Green).

      Teaching one correct way to speak/write harms people. Standard language ideology claims there is only one correct way to use language. Young argues that this belief discriminates against those who use different dialects.

    3. It’s ATTITUDES

      The capitalization of "ATTITUDES" is used to challenge the idea that standard English is inherently superior or necessary for success.