website can also host a reflection of what I learned, etc

how can conventions of children's literature AND critical making practices serve as a site for adult self-reflection

take out, mention studies instead.

why am i calling it this?

I imply that hearing is a privilege without explicitly acknowledging why or mentioning hearing and accessibility differences/disabilities.

This visual interpretation is an additional method, but does not provide enough detail for its purpose and is underdeveloped data. What did this exercise reveal about sound mapping and how does it change the perspective or approach of this assignment?

Evidence of my approach and process.

Indicates how my approach shaped my perspective, reflecting on how this methodology influences environmental interpretation.

Reflects on my methodology.

Here I recognize a personal limitation that shaped my data collection.

Descriptive evidence of my approach using active listening, but could have included timestamps for the viewer's own reference.

Interpretive assumption that the soundscape was both lively and relaxed, being a subjective experience.

Could have referenced back to Kit Dobson's work or how this strengthened my approach and ecperience.

Mentions a limitation of my method, with technology filtering the raw soundscape.

Descriptive data that provides evidence and details of my process.

A part of my method; explains my practice and works as solid evidence of my project. design process However, the "why" aspect could be further explained to strengthen the method.

Here I make a claim without any supporting material or references.

Describes my methodology and connects Dobson's theory to my own practice.

This is an overgeneralized statement that follows a limited critique. It is a strong paraphrase, but gives little information to whether or not this is a direct definition or an interpretation of Dobson's work.

Here I made a claim without any citation to where Dobson confirms or states this in his work. This would be stronger with specific quotations and references to back up my analysis.

Is this subjective? Here I assume that sound universally "evokes memories and history." This is an implied understanding and does not speak for everyone.

Here I identify my methodology and approach, clearly stating my guiding framework for this project.

This is my own interpretation of soundwalks, and could have been reinforced with supporting material or references to why soundwalks are significant and what they do for us (for example, back to Kit Dobson's work).

Here I discuss my assumptions and the benefits of this experience. This could have been connected back to how these hesitations shaped my approach and how they could have limited the depth of data collected.

Social meaning is made by my own assumption.

More of an assumption and interpretation than a truth; are they truly united by the environment or just happen to be in the same place at the same time? If this is true, I could have provided evidence of specific moments of communication through timestamps (however, this would question privacy of individuals).

Demonstrates my method and approach of attentive and active listening, but could be strengthened with evidence such as timestamps, like used in the previous recording.

Using possessive pronouns (you, your) assumes that the listener experiences the exact same sounds I connect to. While this provides relatability and reflection, it does not speak for the whole audience.

Detailed and strong descriptions contribute to the metadata of this project; the information that contextualizes the primary data, which is the raw recordings collected first-hand.

Assumption that other listeners would be able to detect this description the way it is described.

What did this do for the overall project? Would this analysis work with a different approach?

This demonstrates an assumption and limitation to my method, hoping that my phone could accurately record the sounds of my environment.

Definition that should have been cited to better support this definition with evidence, rather than coming off like a personal interpretation, especially as an introduction.

Would benefit from specifying which method's of Dobson's work were used, instead of being broad. To reinforce this critique, I could have reflected on the impact of his methodology for my outcomes, and the difference it would have made had I not referenced his work.

How do they do so? These are key takeaways that are not referenced, and doing so would strengthen the academic groundings of each point.

Would have benefited from defining what active listening is, as well as citing where this information of its importance is stemming from.