As the article begins to conclude, it summarizes some findings and gives ways to limit adverse technological affects wrapping up the level of stasis to policy.

So far it seems as though children can have technology, however, it must be heavily monitored.

This is interesting as many young boys now play war games, could there be some sort of tie in with technology companies wanting to desensitize children for future plans of theirs?

Overall this pieces reported summarized findings of how screens affect the lives of children throughout all the different aspects: to sleep, and to eating.

This portion defines usage of screens and it's affects.

Average teen today currents between 5-9 hours

Speaks over the studies of exercise and screen usage. Level of Stasis: Definition

I feel like there's a pretty huge difference in physical and mental health

Introduction gives an over view of the researched based statistics of different aspect of children using technology.

This is interesting, I feel as there the social level aspect of this has often been ignored at least in my opinion.

Again, the convivence factor plays in.

It does seem as though the level of stasis is past definition, everyone knows and are aware that giving infants screens is not healthy, however it is convenient.

Opens with immediate discussion over technology negatively affecting childhood.

Abstract opens with known knowledge that technology has been growing and there's been more usage, this pushes past the first two steps of stasis, fact and definition. It then says how the review will expand over the effect of screen time showing that this article speaks mostly over quality and policy.